Validity of DIBELS Early Literacy Measures with Korean English Learners
- 154 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of two Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) early literacy measures with first-grade Korean speaking English Learners (ELs). A total of 30 first-grade Korean ELs were screened three times during the year using early literacy measures from DIBELS. A sample of students was provided an empirically supported phonological awareness (PA) intervention to determine whether DIBELS measures were sensitive to growth caused by an intervention. Results suggest screening measures of phoneme segmentation fluency (phoneme segmentation fluency, PSF) were not predictive of reading performance at the middle and end of first grade. Measures of alphabetics (nonsense word fluency, NWF) were predictive of reading skills for this sample of first-grade Korean ELs. PSF and NWF were sensitive to change caused by an intervention, and appear to be able to be used to monitor the impact of a PA intervention. Implications and recommendations for the use of DIBELS with Korean speaking ELs are provided.
KeywordsEarly literacy English learners DIBELS Phonological awareness
- APA, AERA, & NCME. (1999). Testing individuals of diverse linguistic backgrounds. In AERA/APA/NCME (Ed.), Standards for educational and psychological testing (pp. 91–97). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Baker, S. K., & Good, R. H. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: a validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561–578.Google Scholar
- Edformation. (2007). AIMSweb growth tables. Retrieved July 13, 2007, from http://www.aimsweb.com/
- Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. L., Kame’enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to predict reading proficiency in kindergarten through second grade for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37, 391–408.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: a review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.Google Scholar
- Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., & Scarcella, R. (2007). Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: a practice guide. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Good, R. H., & Kaminski, M. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.Google Scholar
- Hopstock, P. J., & Stephenson, T. G. (2003). Special Topic Report #1: Native languages of LEP students. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/resabout/ research/descriptivestudyfiles/native_languages1.pdf
- Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215–227.Google Scholar
- Kindler, A. L. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 2000-2001 summary report. Retrieved from National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition website: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/rcd/BE021853/Survey_of_the_States.pdf
- Korean American Coalition-Census Information Center. (2003). Korean population in the United States, 2000. Retrieved from California State University, Center for Korean American and Korean Studies website: http://www.calstatela.edu/centers/ ckaks/census/ 7203_tables.pdf
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Reading 2009. National assessment of educational progress at grades 4 and 8. Retrieved from National Assessment for Educational Progress website: http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_ 2009 /nat_g4.asp.
- National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2007). The growing numbers of LEP students: 2005-2006 poster. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from http://www.ncela.gwu edu/stats/2_nation.htm.
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/Publications.
- Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: administration and scoring of reading maze for use in general outcome measurement. Retrieved February 10, 2007 from http://www.aimsweb.com
- Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: a confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Vanderwood, M. L. (2004). Phonemic Awareness and Vocabulary Intensive Intervention (PAVII) Version 1.0. Unpublished manual, Graduate School of Education, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA.Google Scholar
- Vanderwood, M. L., & Nam, J. (2008). Best practices in using a response to intervention model with English language learners. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Vanderwood, M. L., Linklater, D., & Healy, K. (2008). Predictive accuracy of nonsense word fluency for English language learners. School Psychology Review, 37, 5–17.Google Scholar