Advertisement

Teaching Anatomy to Neuroscientific Health-Care Professionals: Are They Receiving the Best Anatomical Education?

  • Francesco LatiniEmail author
  • Mats Ryttlefors
Open Access
Short Communication
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

University neuroanatomical courses seldom teach the anatomical-functional connectivity of the brain. White matter dissection improves understanding of brain connectivity, but until now has been restricted to neurosurgeons and in some cases to medical students, never to health-care non-medical professionals. Our aim was to teach white matter anatomy to medical and non-medical students to evaluate this technique in groups with different education. A standardized lab demonstration of white matter anatomy was performed with high appreciation rate in both groups, suggesting a suboptimal neuroanatomical education provided by basic course. We encourage to include this technique of teaching brain anatomy into basic neuroanatomical courses to improve the level of comprehension and competence in all health-care staff within the field of neuroscience.

Keywords

Medical education Lab demonstration Brain anatomy White matter Teaching anatomy Neurosurgical training 

Introduction

Knowledge of superficial and deep brain anatomy provides a better comprehension of clinical symptoms and surgical or medical treatment of brain pathologies. Basic courses on brain anatomy seldom include modern theories on white matter organization and correlated brain functions [1, 2, 3]. Advances in medical imaging, including the use of digital devices and virtual reality, provide new opportunities for learning brain anatomy, but lab demonstration and dissection is still fundamental to a solid learning experience during the basic courses [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

In most university programs worldwide where lab demonstrations of brain anatomy are performed, the classical approach for studying deep cerebral architecture is based on cadaver dissection and two-dimensional (2D) projections/slices of brain specimens [4, 8]. This method is problematic in identifying 3D anatomy, especially origins and terminations of all white matter bundles [8, 10].

Better learning results can be achieved with white matter fiber dissection, a technique based on blunt dissection of white matter pathways removing the cortex of formalin-fixed brains [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. White matter dissection has substantially contributed to our knowledge on brain connectivity [8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. All the neuroscientific health-care professionals are interested in learning these aspects of brain anatomy and functions, but until now, white matter dissection has mostly been utilized by neurosurgeons and in some cases in teaching medical students.

Nurses, nurse assistants, physiotherapists, and other health-care professionals are significantly involved during their professional life in taking care of patients with complex brain lesions at the onset, perioperatively, or during the rehabilitative process. All these categories are not systematically included in advanced courses for learning brain anatomy which resulted in lack of comprehension of anatomical-functional-clinical implications of brain lesions. A more detailed education on brain anatomy and functional connectivity can facilitate comprehension of the neurological/neurosurgical disease and even the rationale for a specific treatment (i.e., awake surgery for tumors harbored in eloquent areas) or the potential mechanism of neuroplasticity and rehabilitation.

Few articles in the literature clearly encourage the use of this technique in teaching white matter anatomy to undergraduate students [8, 9, 13], while no previous article suggests the use of this technique for teaching purposes to non-medical students (in this context, non-medical refers to undergraduate students in nursing, physiotherapy, and other professionals in health care and students in basic neuroscience).

In this study, we report the application of a standardized white matter dissection demonstration to undergraduate medical and non-medical students to improve their understanding of brain anatomy and 3D orientation of brain architecture and its clinical/surgical implications.

Activity

A total number of 40–60 medical students (20–30 per group every semester) received lectures and lab session on deep brain anatomy per year. The same standardized demonstration was also performed for nurse students (40 per year), physiotherapists (10–20 per year), and non-medical staff of neurosurgical and neurological department at Uppsala University Hospital (30 per year).

A standardized stepwise dissection of the white matter architecture was demonstrated through 10 previously dissected specimens (Figs. 1 and 2) to emphasize the surgical-anatomical point of view for students with no previous understanding of neurosurgical brain anatomy. The specimens were used for education as a part of a larger research project on white matter dissection as previously described in other articles [16, 17, 18, 19].
Fig. 1

The picture illustrates the first two exemplary steps of white matter dissection. In a, the initial specimen is utilized to show superficial/gyral dissection and the major lobes. In the upper part of the specimen, the arachnoid layer and the cortical vessels have been removed to better illustrate the anatomical/surgical relationship between cortex and deep meningeal layer. Colored pins are used during the dissection to facilitate orientation from the cortical level to the midline structures (in this case the Broca’s area, precentral and postcentral gyrus and Wernicke’s area are marked). b A second step of the dissection when most of the cortex within the sulci has been removed and the first layer of subcortical connectivity including short U-fibers is exposed

Fig. 2

Exemplary specimens used during the demonstration. a The central sulcus region has been removed revealing the whole course of the arcuate fasciculus (green pins). On the temporo-occipital region, the whole course of the two major longitudinal fibers systems (inferior longitudinal fasciculus, blue pins; and middle longitudinal fasciculus, yellow pins) has been exposed. Functional interaction between the systems as well as information provided by direct cortical/subcortical brain mapping are described to facilitate comprehension of the anatomy. Relationships with the insular lobe are illustrated, introducing the uncinate fasciculus (red pin) and the aslant tract (white pins). b A deeper layer of white matter is illustrated retracting the middle longitudinal fasciculus (yellow pin) and revealing the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (black pins) within the sagittal stratum of Sachs. Anteriorly in fronto-temporal region, the course of the uncinate fasciculus is now exposed from the lateral view (red pins). Only the posterior portion of the insula (long gyri) has been saved to illustrate the anatomy of the extreme capsule (white pin) and the external capsule (dark blue pin). Three-dimensional orientation as well as function supported by these structures are provided during the demonstration

The students were divided in groups of 4–8 persons. The instructor presented an oral introductory overview about the theory of white matter organization, functional connectivity of brain functions, and neuroplasticity in the initial part of the lab demonstration. The whole demonstration took 45 to 60 min depending on the subsequent discussion and questions.

An anonymous evaluation questionnaire was administered to all the students at the end of each course and filled out after the demonstration. The medical students were asked to evaluate the learning activity (lab demonstration) on a scale from 1 to 5 (in progressive order of appreciation), where 1 stands for useless/insufficient and 5 stands for excellent. Non-medical students were asked to evaluate the learning activity on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 stands for useless/insufficient experience and 10 stands for very important/positive experience. All the students were also asked to comment in free text their thoughts and experiences of the learning activity and/or suggest improvements. The differences in the scales reflected the same appreciation scoring methods that each group was familiar with during the other educational courses.

Results and Discussion

A total number of 201 students attended the white matter dissection demonstrations during the last 2.5 years and 97% of them returned the questionnaire. The general reception of the demonstration was very positive for all the groups. The evaluation rates for medical students (103 questionnaires; IQ1 4.0, median 5.0, mean 4.5, IQ3 5.0) and non-medical students (92 questionnaires; IQ1 7.0, median 10.0, mean 9.4, IQ3 10.0) are displayed in Fig. 3. Most of the comments from medical students described the experience as an important and illustrative/didactic complement to their previous knowledge of 2-dimensional anatomy. For para-medical participants, the comments described how interesting and stimulating it was for them to see the 3D anatomy, instead of studying anatomy in a book and/or computer-based programs. The common suggested improvement was the need to include the white matter anatomy learning activity into the basic course for anatomy and brain functions.
Fig. 3

The bar graphs show the quantitative results from the questionnaire analysis. In the upper part is the frequency histogram for medical students showing the distribution of the appreciation scores. In the lower part is the frequency histogram for non-medical students showing the distribution of the appreciation scores. The quantitative score from the questionnaires was analyzed using RStudio (Version 1.1.456–© 2009-2018 RStudio, Inc.)

Our experience in teaching brain anatomy with the support of white matter dissection demonstrated assuring results in terms of feedback and usefulness by the participants.

The aim of the demonstration was to give the students a visual 3D experience on deep white matter architecture. The possibility to handle the specimens with exposed trajectories and cortical terminations was considered as very helpful in understanding the real anatomy underneath the cortex. Ninety-two percent of the medical students considered the lab demonstration an excellent or very important experience in learning brain anatomy (Fig. 3). This is in accordance with many articles supporting the importance of physical demonstration rather than computer-based anatomy for learning improvement [4, 8, 9]. According to their knowledge based on standard anatomical lectures and lab demonstrations on brain anatomy, they could not name more than two structures involving white matter, i.e., corpus callosum and internal capsule. Moreover, when asked, the real orientation of these two structures was poorly understood. The lack of anatomical knowledge for a medical doctor is a potential problem in understanding the clinical implications of a brain damage and its related treatment.

This is a very important and well-established method in neurosurgical training [11, 13]. Contributing to a better understanding of the structural connectivity of the brain [11, 13, 20] and due to the good consistency with modern techniques of neuroimaging [20, 21], the use of white matter dissection in neurosurgical and neuroradiological training has been widely encouraged [11, 22]. However, we believe that not only neurosurgeons should be able to understand deep brain anatomy but also any medical student should receive a comprehensive education on three-dimensional brain anatomy during their basic medical education. Future general practitioners, neurologists, psychiatrist, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists play key roles within the neuroscientific field. A better understanding of brain anatomy can positively influence their skills and understanding of brain diseases.

Our results demonstrated another important implication of this teaching process and modality. Nurses, nurse assistants, physiotherapists, and other professionals are very interested in learning brain anatomy at an advanced level. Ninety-two percent of the non-medical students judged this experience as excellent or very important for anatomy learning (Fig. 3).

Our results support two critical considerations. First, despite the differences in general level of education, both medical students and other health-care professionals are receiving an incomplete neuroanatomical education. Second, other categories of health professionals, previously excluded from advanced neuroanatomical courses, are interested in learning and understanding more about brain anatomy and its functional connectivity.

Hence, we strongly suggest to systematically include this technique into basic neuroanatomical courses to medical students, non-medical students, and other health-care professionals. This would improve the level of comprehension and competence in all health-care staff within the field of neuroscience. Future studies with quantitative and qualitative comparisons between teaching techniques will be necessary to confirm how the clinical and rehabilitative aspects could be improved by a better anatomical knowledge.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The specimens were used for education as a part of a larger research project on white matter dissection as already published by our group. The study protocol was filed with the application for ethical vetting of research involving humans to the Regional Ethical Vetting Board in Uppsala, Sweden (Dnr 2014/468).

Informed Consent

The cerebral hemispheres were obtained from human cadavers donated in the Department of Medical Cell Biology, Section for Anatomy Studies at Uppsala University, Sweden. All individuals who donated had given written consent for the use of the whole cadaver for biomedical research and education in a testimonial donation letter.

References

  1. 1.
    Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MFS. Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silasi G, Murphy TH. Stroke and the connectome: how connectivity guides therapeutic intervention. Neuron. 2014;83:1354–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeh F-C, Panesar S, Fernandes D, Meola A, Yoshino M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. NeuroImage. 2018;178:57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wainman B, Wolak L, Pukas G, Zheng E, Norman GR. The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med Educ. 2018;52:1138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat Anat Anz Off Organ Anat Ges. 2016;208:151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papa V, Vaccarezza M. Teaching anatomy in the XXI century: new aspects and pitfalls. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:310348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnts H, Kleinnijenhuis M, Kooloos JGM, Schepens-Franke AN, van Cappellen van Walsum A-M. Combining fiber dissection, plastination, and tractography for neuroanatomical education: revealing the cerebellar nuclei and their white matter connections. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41:15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zemmoura I, Vons J, Velut S, Destrieux C. From Vesalius to tractography. J Neurosurg Sci. 2015;59:309–25.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agrawal A, Kapfhammer JP, Kress A, Wichers H, Deep A, Feindel W, et al. Josef Klingler’s models of white matter tracts: influences on neuroanatomy, neurosurgery, and neuroimaging. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:238–52 discussion 252-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LE Klingler J. Noyaux et faisceaux du cerveau humain. Nancy: George Thomas; 1938.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva SM, Andrade JP. Neuroanatomy: the added value of the Klingler method. Ann Anat Anat Anz Off Organ Anat Ges. 2016;208:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zemmoura I, Blanchard E, Raynal P-I, Rousselot-Denis C, Destrieux C, Velut S. How Klingler’s dissection permits exploration of brain structural connectivity? An electron microscopy study of human white matter. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221:2477–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dejerine J, Dejerine A. Anatomie des centres nerveux. Paris: Rueff; 1895.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latini F, Hjortberg M, Aldskogius H, Ryttlefors M. The use of a cerebral perfusion and immersion-fixation process for subsequent white matter dissection. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;253:161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Latini F, Mårtensson J, Larsson E-M, Fredrikson M, Åhs F, Hjortberg M, et al. Segmentation of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain: a white matter dissection and diffusion tensor tractography study. Brain Res. 1675;2017:102–15.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Latini F, Hjortberg M, Aldskogius H, Ryttlefors M. The classical pathways of occipital lobe epileptic propagation revised in the light of white matter dissection. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:872645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Latini F, Ryttlefors M. Rethinking the standard trans-cortical approaches in the light of superficial white matter anatomy. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10:1906–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fernández-Miranda JC, Rhoton AL, Alvarez-Linera J, Kakizawa Y, Choi C, de Oliveira EP. Three-dimensional microsurgical and tractographic anatomy of the white matter of the human brain. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:989–1026 discussion 1026-1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zemmoura I, Serres B, Andersson F, Barantin L, Tauber C, Filipiak I, et al. FIBRASCAN: a novel method for 3D white matter tract reconstruction in MR space from cadaveric dissection. NeuroImage. 2014;103:106–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liakos F, Koutsarnakis C. The role of white matter dissection technique in modern neuroimaging: can neuroradiologists benefit from its use? Surg Radiol Anat SRA. 2016;38:275–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, NeurosurgeryUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations