Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes of Medical Residents Towards Nanomedicine: Defining the Gap
Even though the general public opinion towards nanotechnology applications to health has been studied, medical residents’ opinions remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perception, knowledge, and attitude of medical residents towards nanomedicine using a 35-item questionnaire. Correlations between intrinsic factors, heuristics, and attitude towards nanomedicine were analyzed using the χ2 test. Seventy medical residents participated. Nanomedicine was perceived as a developing field in its clinical trial stages. Responsibility for nanomedicine was attributed to scientists, whereas its ethical responsibility to physicians. The majority reported not having adequate access to information. A positive attitude towards nanomedicine was correlated with higher willingness to use nanomedicine to diagnose and treat patients (p < 0.05). Medical residents had a positive attitude towards nanomedicine. However, they lacked accurate knowledge in the field. Participants might have relied on availability heuristics to form their opinion. Formal education for the “handlers” of nanomedicine seems to be needed.
KeywordsNanomedicine Nanotechnology Heuristics
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.[ESF] European Science Foundation. Nanomedicine – an ESF–European Medical Research Councils (EMRC) forward look report. Strasbourg cedex: France ESF; 2004.Google Scholar
- 10.Einsiedel E (2005). In the public eye: the early landscape of nanotechnology among Canadian and US publics. First Impressions: understanding public views on emerging technologies, 99-117.Google Scholar
- 12.Fujita Y, Yokoyama H, Abe S. Perception of nanotechnology among the general public in Japan—of the NRI Nanotechnology and Society Survey Project. Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly. 2006;4(1–2).Google Scholar
- 17.Friedman A, Nasir A. Nanotechnology and dermatology education in the United States: data from a pilot survey. J Drugs Dermatol: JDD. 2011;10(9):1037–41.Google Scholar
- 18.Scheufele DA, & Turney J (2006). Messages and heuristics: how audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. Engaging science: thoughts, deeds, analysis and action.Google Scholar
- 24.Hudson K, Lifton R, & Patrick-Lake B (2015). The precision medicine initiative cohort program—building a research foundation for 21st century medicine. Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group Report to the Advisory Committee to the Director, ed. Accessed on 4/7/18Google Scholar
- 25.Quirola N, Marquez V, Tecpan, S, & Baltazar SE (2018). Didactic proposal to include nanoscience and nanotechnology at high school curriculum linking physics, chemistry and biology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1043, No. 1, p. 012050). IOP Publishing.Google Scholar