Clerkship Curriculum Design and USMLE Step 2 Performance: Exploring the Impact of Self-Regulated Exam Preparation
- 17 Downloads
This study examined medical students’ stress and certification exam preparation practices in a reformed clerkship curriculum that excluded high-stakes knowledge testing from end-of-rotation performance evaluation.
Stress and exam preparation practices were assessed via a survey comprising locally developed questions, three subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, and two subscales of the Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire. The association between stress, learning self-regulation, and certification exam scores was evaluated retrospectively using non-parametric tests of association (Spearman’s rho).
Forty students responded to the survey and consented to use of academic performance data (57% participation rate). Mean certification exam scores were indistinguishable from historical controls. Exam preparation practices resembled those of pre-clinical students: exam-related worrying and time devoted to studying were high, increasing as the exam drew near; preferred study resources were directly analogous to exam questions; and study involved relatively few generative strategies (e.g., concept mapping). Sustaining effort and creating time and space to study were associated with better exam performance, as was participation in this study.
On the surface, the absence of regularly spaced, high-stakes testing from clerkship performance evaluation appears to “do no harm” to students’ certification exam scores. Students already performing better academically may excel due in part to effective learning self-regulation strategies. However, a clerkship curriculum that does not scaffold self-regulation via cumulative knowledge assessment could further disadvantage students already earning lower scores. Evaluating the impact of curriculum reforms should continuously examine changes to learners’ experience in context.
KeywordsClerkship curriculum Cumulative assessment Step 2 CK Self-regulated learning
We gratefully acknowledge the research support of Dominic Antonacci, MD, who aided with participant recruitment and survey design.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the institutional Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (protocol #17-148).
Participants in this study gave informed consent separately to participate in the survey and to allow researchers access to personally identifiable academic performance data. The consent process and forms were approved by the institutional Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (protocol #17-148).
- 1.National Board of Medical Examiners. Characteristics of clinical clerkships. 2016. http://www.nbme.org/PDF/SubjectExams/Clerkship_Survey_Summary.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2018.
- 9.Klamen DL. Getting real: embracing the conditions of the third-year clerkship and reimagining the curriculum to enable deliberate practice. Acad Med 2015;90(10):1314–7.Google Scholar
- 17.Klamen DL, Williams RG, Hingle S. Getting real: aligning the learning needs of clerkship students with the current clinical learning environment. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):53–8.Google Scholar
- 19.Pintrich PR, et al. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 1991.Google Scholar
- 20.Artino Jr AR. Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Online Submission. 2005. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499083 Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
- 21.Yusoff MSB, Rahim AFA, Yaacob MJ. The development and validity of the Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire (MSSQ). ASEAN J Psychiatry. 2010;11(1):231–5.Google Scholar
- 23.Seetha MU, Zaidi NLB, Gruppen L, Gelb DJ, Grum C, Morgan HK, Daniel M, Mangrulkar R, Santen SA. Does reducing clerkship lengths by 25% affect medical student performance and perceptions? Acad Med;e-pub ahead of print.Google Scholar