Exploring Medical Students’ and Faculty’s Perspectives on Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experience
In terms of curriculum development, it is important for faculties to set up a learning environment that supports activities that facilitate the achievement of the intended learning outcomes. This study explores perspectives from medical students and faculty on the benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Thematic analyses of interview data from 18 students and 11 faculty members indicated that transferable skills (e.g., active learning and critical appraisal) were commonly perceived as benefits of undergraduate research (UR) by students (28.6%) and faculty members (35.5%). On the other hand, the most commonly identified benefit of UR among students was research-specific skills (e.g., conducting rigorous experiments and designing a study) (39.7%) and knowledge (22.2%). Faculty members intended to enhance students’ attitudes toward research during UR (e.g., having an inquisitive mind and being research-minded) (50.9%). This study demonstrates that this perception gap is caused by the students’ perceptions of research and faculty members’ difficulties in engaging students during research through mentorship. Therefore, students and faculty members need to thoroughly discuss how they engage mutually, negotiate common purposes, and develop resources for UR. It should be noted that institutional support for mentoring relationships such as offering more opportunities where the faculty members can discuss the best pedagogical approach in UR with others across departments and institutions is key to aligning teaching for constructive learning.
KeywordsUndergraduate research Student perceptions of learning Faculty intended learning outcome Curriculum development
This paper was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Number 17K15741.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
This work was granted by the Institutional Review Board at Gifu University (25-360).
- 1.Wenzel TJ. What is undergraduate research? Counc Undergrad Res Q. 1997;17:163.Google Scholar
- 2.Kuh GD. High-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities; 2008.Google Scholar
- 9.Imafuku R, Saiki T, Kawakami C, Suzuki Y. How do students’ perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:47–55.Google Scholar
- 15.Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university – what the student does. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
- 16.Biggs J. Aligning teaching for constructing learning. York: Higher Education Academy; 2003. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/aligning-teaching-constructing-learning. Accessed 12 Jun 2018Google Scholar
- 18.Kharraz R, Hamadah R, Alfawaz D, Attasi J, Obeidat AS, Alkattan W, et al. Perceived barriers towards participation in undergraduate research activities among medical students at Alfaisal University—College of Medicine: a Saudi Arabian perspective. Med Teach. 2016;38(sup1):S12–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lopatto D. The essential features of undergraduate research. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2003;24:139–42.Google Scholar
- 26.Imafuku R, Saiki T, Suzuki Y. Developing undergraduate research in Japanese medical education. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2016;37(1):34–40.Google Scholar
- 28.Healey M, Jenkins A. Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: The Higher Education Academy; 2009. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry. Accessed 21 Mar 2018Google Scholar