Medical Science Educator

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 489–495 | Cite as

The Impact of a Structured Research Scholarship Course on Evidence-Based Medicine Skills among Undergraduate Medical Students

  • Carla S. LupiEmail author
  • Melissa Ward-Peterson
  • Juan M. Lozano
Original Research


While the inclusion of mandatory research or scholarly projects in undergraduate medical education is growing, research on learning outcomes has derived almost entirely from surveys of student perception rather than direct assessments of knowledge and skills. We investigate the impact of participation in a structured research course on skills in evidence-based medicine (EBM). We compared performance on a test of EBM knowledge and skills among students who had participated in a summer research course and completed a mandatory EBM/epidemiology curriculum to those that experienced only the mandatory curriculum. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After adjusting for measures of academic standing and performance in epidemiology and EBM courses, we found that students completing the summer research course had approximately three times the odds of demonstrating competence in PICO question construction (OR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.5–7.7) and acquiring information (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.4–7.0), as compared to students who did not participate. The mean Fresno test score for those participating in the summer research course was 157.8 (SD = 21.3) compared to 149.9 (SD = 21.6) for those who did not (mean difference 7.9; 95% CI 1.8–14.0; p = 0.011). Our findings support an educationally significant effect of participation in a structured research course intercalated into a mandatory EBM curriculum on two essential EBM skills: clinical question formulation and acquiring information. Additional work to increase the precision of these results and investigate the impact of participation on skills demonstrated in the context of authentic clinical care is necessary.


Evidence-based medicine Medical students Undergraduate medical education Curricular research Scholarly concentration Fresno test 


Funding information

Melissa Ward-Peterson is supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities grant (1U54MD012393-01) for FIU-RCMI.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Liasion Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School. 2016. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  2. 2.
    Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, Adler SR, Nothnagle M, Parsonnet J, et al. Encouraging scholarship: medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Curriculum inventory and reports: medical student research requirement, curriculum years. (n.d.). Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  4. 4.
    Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85:220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsonnet J, Gruppuso PA, Kanter SL, Boninger M. Required vs. elective research and in-depth scholarship programs in the medical student curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:405–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Angus SV, Vu TR, Willett LL, Call S, Halvorsen AJ, Chaudhry S. Internal medicine residency program directors’ views of the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: an opportunity to enhance communication of competency along the continuum. Acad Med. 2017;92:785–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maggio LA, ten Cate O, Chen HC, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Challenges to learning evidence-based medicine and educational approaches to meet these challenges: a qualitative study of selected EBM curricula in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2016;91:101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers’ guide. 2014. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  10. 10.
    Bierer SB, Chen HC. How to measure success: the impact of scholarly concentrations on students--a literature review. Acad Med. 2010;85:438–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amgad M, Tsui MMK, Liptrott SJ, Shash E. Medical student research: an integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Acuña JM, Ward-Peterson M, Zevallos JC, Castro G, Rodríguez de la Vega P, Guzzone F, et al. Development of a mandatory research scholarship course at a new medical school in Miami, Florida. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:155–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    JAMA evidence. Users’ guides to the medical literature: an approach to evidence-based medicine. (n.d.). Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  14. 14.
    Duke Teaching and Leading EBM: A workshop for educators and champions of evidence-based medicine. (n.d.). Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  15. 15.
    Maggio LA, ten Cate O, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Designing evidence-based medicine training to optimize the transfer of skills from the classroom to clinical practice: applying the four component instructional design model. Acad Med. 2015;90:1457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramos KD, Schafer S, Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2003;326:319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lupi CS, Lefevre F, Ward-Peterson, M, et al. Progress toward assessment of a longitudinal curriculum for EPA 7: form clinical questions and retrieve evidence to advance patient care. Poster presented at the 2016 AAMC Learn Serve Lead Annual Meeting. Accessed 15 Jul 2017.

Copyright information

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla S. Lupi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melissa Ward-Peterson
    • 2
  • Juan M. Lozano
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herbert Wertheim College of MedicineFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social WorkFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Medical and Population Health Sciences Research, Herbert Wertheim College of MedicineFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations