Identifying High-Performing Students in Inpatient Clerkships: A Qualitative Study
Examine fundamental behaviors and characteristics that attending physicians in inpatient settings utilize to identify high-performing clerkship students.
We employed written comment data from a cross-sectional survey of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics attending physicians at a single academic medical center in the southern USA. Free-text responses regarding factors that faculty consider when assigning honors grades were analyzed by four trained researchers (interrater agreement 0.87) using conventional content analysis to identify themes.
Seventy-nine of 141 (56%) attending physicians who were surveyed provided 90 comments.
Four major theme areas for recognizing higher performing clerkship students were identified: Taking Ownership of Patient Care (35%), Medical Knowledge and Clinical Reasoning (20%), Team Orientation (15%), and Awareness of Opportunities for Growth and Progress (13%).
Internal Medicine and Pediatric attending physicians identified characteristics that contributed to four themes in the determination of a high-performing medical student. These findings are particularly salient, as they highlight that commitment to patients, application of clinical knowledge and skills, teamwork, and awareness of growth and progress are valued by attending physicians for identifying top performing students in inpatient settings.
KeywordsMedical student assessment Performance-based assessment Clinical clerkship evaluations Clinical clerkship grading Qualitative research
Medical Education Research Interest Group, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Medicine. Dr. Chang Wu, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Drs. Khodadadi and Herrera were medical students was conducted, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Medicine, in Birmingham, AL, USA
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed and approved this study involving human participants and assigned Exempt Status.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 10.Colbert-Getz J. Is there an “Honors” level of competency or is it time to retire the “H” grade in clerkships? In: Learn serve lead. Boston: AAMC; 2017. p. 2017.Google Scholar
- 13.Lee KB, Vaishnavi SN, Lau SK, Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. “Making the grade:” noncognitive predictors of medical students’ clinical clerkship grades. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(10):1138–50.Google Scholar
- 19.Roman BJB, Trevino J. An approach to address grade inflation in a psychiatry clerkship. 2006;30(2):110–5.Google Scholar
- 23.National Resident Matching Program DRaRC. Results of the 2016 NRMP Program Director Survey. Washington, DC: Title -- A to Z; 2016.Google Scholar
- 25.Sobowale K, Ham SA, Curlin FA, Yoon JD. Personality traits are associated with academic achievement in medical school: a nationally representative study. Acad Psychiatry. 2017.Google Scholar
- 28.Herrera LS, Khodadadi, et al. What defines an honors student? Ward attending physicians’ perspective. Washington, DC: SGIM Annual Meeting; 2018.Google Scholar
- 29.Holmboe E, Edgar L, Hamstra S. The milestones guidebook, 2016.Google Scholar
- 30.Schmit E, Wu C, Herrera N, Khodadadi R, Williams W, Estrada C. What defines an honors student? Pediatric and internal medicine values. Nashville: Pediatric Hospital Medicine; 2017.Google Scholar
- 31.Williams W, Herrera N, Khodadadi R, et al. What sets honors students apart? A ward attending perspective. San Antonio: Academic Internal Medicine Week; 2018.Google Scholar