Considering the Yin and Yang of Teaching and Learning: a Resource for the Novice Educator
This paper introduces four key teaching and learning concepts that may be useful for novice educators new to the teaching and learning process. We have organized these concepts into the Chinese symbol of a yin–yang where one side captures what is needed for student learning to occur and, the other, what teachers need to do to prepare for teaching. This two-sided symbol brings together several practical ideas, such as cognitive load theory, co-construction of knowledge, and instructional design principles that may be useful for faculty new to teaching and learning.
KeywordsLearning theory Faculty development Cognitive load Instructional design Undergraduate medical education Teaching
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval was not sought for this paper due to the nature of its contents.
There are no participants, so no informed consent was needed.
- 3.Jones K, Jones J, Vermette P. Six common lesson planning pitfalls—recommendations for novice educators. Education. 2011;131(4):845–64.Google Scholar
- 4.Bartell C. The challenges facing beginning teachers. Cultivating high-quality teaching through induction and mentoring. Northridge: Corwin; 2004. p. 1–19.Google Scholar
- 5.Jensen GM, Mostrom E. Handbook of teaching and learning for physical therapists. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013.Google Scholar
- 7.Tharp RG, Estrada P, Dalton S, Yamauchi L. Teaching transformed: achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder: Westview Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 8.Andre T. Selected microinstructional methods to facilitate knowledge construction: implications for instructional design. In: Tennyson RD, Schott F, Seel N, Dijkstra S, editors. Instructional design: international perspective: theory, research, and models. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997. p. 243–67.Google Scholar
- 15.Atkinson R, Shiffrin R. Human memory: a proposed system and its control mechanisms. The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 549–97.Google Scholar
- 24.Wiggins G, McTighe J. Understanding by design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2005.Google Scholar
- 28.Ferris H, O'Flynn D. Assessment in medical education; what are we trying to achieve? Int J Higher Educ. 2015;4(2):139–44.Google Scholar
- 32.Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):133–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar