Advertisement

Medical Science Educator

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 409–415 | Cite as

Flipping Pathology: Our Experience at an Australian Medical School

  • Rajasekaran KoteeswaranEmail author
  • Peter Simpson
  • Emma Bartle
  • Deborah Smith
  • Ekta Bhutada
  • Julie Ayre
  • Sunil R. Lakhani
Monograph

Abstract

Flipped classroom and active learning pedagogies are gaining popularity in institutions across the world. There are very few studies about their use in Australian medical schools, in particular the pre-clinical sciences. In this paper, we share our experience of adopting the flipped classroom approach in teaching pathology to second year medical students at the University of Queensland, School of Medicine. The overall response from our students was positive but we are also aware of the limitations and shortcomings. Our findings, particularly student perceptions, can guide other investigators in flipping their course.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Pathology Active learning Student engagement E-lectures Small group learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following members who were a valuable part of pathology teaching team and their contribution to this project.

Neville Zell (Integrated Pathology Learning Center, UQ SOM) for designing teaching space to facilitate team work.

Kelly Matthews (Senior Lecturer, Curriculum Development) at Teaching and Educational Development Institute, The University of Queensland for assistance in drafting a lesson plan for the tutorial sessions.

Shari Bowker (Pathology student coordinator, UQ SOM) for survey deployment and data collection in semester 1.

Amy Wong (Evaluations officer, UQ SOM) for survey deployment and data collection in semester 2.

Pathology Registrars & Consultants—Pathology Queensland, the Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, and Specialist pathologists from ENVOI and AQUESTA, Brisbane, Australia for assisting with the teaching delivery.

The University of Queensland medical students for participating in the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by Behaviour and Social Sciences Ethical Review Committee, The University of Queensland (approval no: 2014000798).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutherford S (2014) Flipping the classroom. Enhancing learning and teaching through technology. Case Studies: Showcase. Higher Education Funding Council for Wales. http://www.hefcw.ac.uk/documents/policy_areas/learning_and_teaching/ELTT%20-%20showcase%20case%20studies.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2015
  2. 2.
    Boucher B, Robertson E, Wainner R, Sanders B. Flipping Texas State University’s physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: implementation of a hybrid learning model. J Phys Ther Educ. 2013;27(3):72–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chi J, Verghese A. Clinical education and the electronic health record: the flipped patient. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2331–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. 1st ed. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1657–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1202451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1407–10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a368bd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236–43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bishop JL, Verleger MA (2013) The flipped classroom: a survey of the research paper presented at 2013 ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) Annual conference & exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6219/download. Accessed 23 July 2015.
  9. 9.
    Day JA, Foley JD. Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course. IEEE Trans Educ. 2006;49(4):420–31. doi: 10.1109/TE.2006.879792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goss P, Hunter J, Romanes D, Parsonage H (2015) Targeted teaching: how better use of data can improve student learning. Grattan Institute. http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/827-Targeted-Teaching.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2015.
  12. 12.
    Butt A. Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation. 2014;6(1):33–44.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sams A, Bergmann J. Flip your students' learning. Educ Leadersh. 2013;70(6):16–20.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    White C, Bradley E, Martindale J, Roy P, Patel K, Yoon M, Worden MK. Why are medical students 'checking out' of active learning in a new curriculum? Med Educ. 2014;48(3):315–24. doi: 10.1111/medu.12356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, School of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Microbiology & Molecular Cell BiologyEastern Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolkUSA
  3. 3.UQ Centre for Clinical ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.School of DentistryThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  5. 5.Pathology QueenslandThe Royal Brisbane & Women’s HospitalBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations