Conceptual heterogeneity and the legacy of organicism: thoughts on the life organic

Essay review of Erik Peterson, The life organic: the theoretical biology club and the roots of epigenetics, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016, 328 pp., $45.00
  • Daniel S. BrooksEmail author
Review Essay

In Erik Peterson’s The Life Organic: The Theoretical Biology Club and the Roots of Epigenetics (TLO, hereafter), we are treated to the most comprehensive engagement of organicist thought from one source in the almost half century since Donna Haraway’s (1976) touchstone Crystals Fabrics, and Fields. The book is certainly a timely one. Indeed, organicism has experienced something of a minor renaissance in the first two decades of this millennium, with preceding works like Maurizio Esposito’s Romantic Biology (2015), and Daniel J. Nicholson’s and Richard Gawne’s collaborations (2014, 2015) spearheading a more thorough investigation of this nigh-forgotten but prescient and fecund period of biology’s history.

Peterson’s contribution to this literature stands out as a book-length documentary of the goings-on of the core members of the Cambridge University-based Theoretical Biology Club (TBC), whose numbers included, among others, such radical and colorful characters as Dorothy and Joseph...



  1. Abir-Am, P. G. (1987). The biotheoretical gathering, transdisciplinary authority and the incipient legitimation of molecular biology in the 1930’s: New perspective on the historical sociology of science. History of Science, 25, 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time and deity: The Gifford lectures at Glasgow, 1916–1918 (2nd ed.). London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Baedke, J. (2013). The epigenetic landscape in the course of time: Conrad Hal Waddington’s methodological impact on the life sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 756–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baedke, J. (2018). Above the gene, beyond biology; toward a philosophy of epigenetics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution: Qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonner, J. T. (Ed.). (1982). Evolution and development: Report of the Dahlem workshop on evolution and development Berlin 1981, May 10–15. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Broad, C. D. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. London: Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  8. Callebaut, W. (1993). Taking the naturalistic turn, or, how real philosophy of science is done. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crowe, N., Dietrich, M. R., Alomepe, B. S., Antrim, A. F., ByrneSim, B. L., & He, Yi. (2015). The diversification of developmental biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 53, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esposito, M. (2015). Romantic biology, 1890–1945. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert, S. F., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Embracing complexity: Organicism for the twenty-first century. Developmental Dynamics, 219(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golley, F. (1996). A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: More than the sum of the parts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, S. J. (1973). Order and Life by Joseph Needham. Leonardo, 6(3), 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall, B. K., Pearson, R. D., & Müller, G. B. (2004). Environment, development, and evolution: Toward a synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (1976). Crystals, fabrics, and fields: Metaphors of organicism in twentieth century developmental biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kwa, C. (1987). Representations of nature mediating between ecology and science policy: The case of the international biology program. Social Studies of Science, 17, 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laubichler, M., & Maienschein, J. (Eds.). (2007). From embryology to Evo-Devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. McLaughlin, B. P. (1992). The rise and fall of British emergentism. In H. F. Beckermann & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? (pp. 49–93). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Needham, J. (1936). Order and life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Needham, J. (1942). Berkeleian biology. Nature, 129(3258), 524–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicholson, D. J., & Gawne, R. (2014). Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 47(2), 243–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicholson, D. J., & Gawne, R. (2015). Neither logical empiricism nor vitalism, but organicism: What the philosophy of biology was. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 37(4), 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Odum, E. P. (1977). The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195(4284), 1289–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution—the extended synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Senechal, M. (2013). I died for beauty: Dorothy Wrinch and the cultures of science. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sölch, D. (2016). Wheeler and Whitehead: Process biology and process philosophy in the early twentieth century. Journal of the History of Ideas, 77(3), 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waddington, C. H. (1952). The epigenetics of birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Waddington, C. H. (1975). The origin. In E. Worthington (Ed.), The evolution of the IBP (pp. 4–7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wheeler, M. (1926). Emergent evolution and the social. Science, 64(1662), 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations