History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 138–150

Ernst Mayr’s interactions with J. B. S. Haldane

Notes and Comments

Abstract

Ernst Mayr and J. B. S. Haldane, major contributors to the ‘modern synthesis’ in evolutionary theory, set an example of how scientific disagreements need not come in the way of friendship. After getting acquainted, they kept discussing issues related to evolution until just before Haldane’s death in 1964. Their dissimilar backgrounds meant that they adopted different approaches. A major disagreement emerged regarding the right way to look at the role of genes in evolution. Mayr felt that the elementary models of population genetics were oversimplifications and therefore inadequate for representing evolutionary processes, though he was not consistent in his attitude. Haldane, on the other hand, maintained that the mathematical treatment of simple models had an important role to play. The Mayr-Haldane interactions illustrate divergent viewpoints concerning the utility of mathematics in biology.

Keywords

Population genetics Beanbag dispute Evolution Mathematical models 

References

  1. Buzzati-Traverso, A. A. (ed.) 1954. Symposium on genetics of population structure, Pavia, Italy, August 20–23, 1953. (Sécrétariat général de I’U.I.S.B., International Union of Biological Sciences. Series B.; Colloquia.).Google Scholar
  2. Cain, J. & Mayr, E. 2004. Exploring the Borderlands: Documents of the committee on common problems of genetics, paleontology, and systematics. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (New Series) 94 (2): i, iii–v, vii, ix–xlii, 1–17, 19–39, 41–107, 109–123, 125–133, 135–137, 139–151, 153–160.Google Scholar
  3. Crow, J. F. (1999). Hardy, Weinberg and Language Impediments. Genetics, 152(3), 821–825.Google Scholar
  4. Dobzhansky, T. 1955. A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics. In Population genetics: The nature and causes of genetic variability in populations (Vol. 20, pp. 1–15). Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, R. A. 1930/1958/1999. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1930); Dover, New York (2nd ed., 1958); and Variorum Edition, edited with foreword and notes by J. H. Bennett, Oxford University Press (1999).Google Scholar
  6. Futuyma, D. (2013). Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Haldane, J. B. S. 1932/1990. The causes of evolution, London/Princeton: Longmans Green and Co Ltd/Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Haldane, J. B. S. 1953. “Foreword”, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology (Vol. 7, pp. IX–XIX). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haldane, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 55, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haldane, J. B. S. (1964). A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 7, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jepsen, G. L., Mayr, E., & Simpson, G. G. (Eds.). (1949). Genetics, palaeontology, and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Li, C. C. (1955). Population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mayr, E. (1955). “Integration of Genotypes: Synthesis”, Population Genetics: The nature and causes of genetic variability in populations. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 20, 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayr, E. (1959). “Where are We?”. Genetics and the twentieth century Darwinism. Cold Spring Harbour Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 24, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayr, E. (1980). How I became a Darwinian. In E. Mayr & W. B. Provine (Eds.), The evolutionary synthesis, perspectives on the unification of biology (pp. 413–423). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayr, E. (1992). Haldane’s causes of evolution after 60 years. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67(2), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nanjundiah, V. (2005). Mathematics and biology. Current Science, 88, 388–393.Google Scholar
  19. Provine, W. B. 1971/2001. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Provine, W. B. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis. In Mayr, E. & Provine, W. B. (eds) 1980/1998, the evolutionary synthesis, perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Provine, W. B. (2004). Ernst Mayr: Genetics and speciation. Genetics, 167, 1041–1046.Google Scholar
  22. Rao, V. & Nanjundiah, V., 2010/2011. J. B. S. Haldane, Ernst Mayr and the Beanbag Genetics Dispute. Journal of the History of Biology 44, 233–281. doi:10.1007/s10739-010-9229-5.
  23. Sarkar, S. (2005). In memoriam: Ernst Mayr (1904–2005). Journal of Biosciences, 30, 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarkar S., 2007. Haldane and the emergence of the modern evolutionary theory. In Matthen, M. & Stephen, C. (eds), Handbook of the philosophy of science (Vol. 3). Philosophy of Biology, 7, 186–199.Google Scholar
  25. Sarkar, S. (2013). Mayr’s recollections of Haldane: A document with brief commentary. Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 35(2), 265–275.Google Scholar
  26. Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Wilkins, A. S. (2002). Interview with Ernst Mayr. BioEssays, 24(10), 960–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright, S. (1960). Genetics and Twentieth Century Darwinism—A review and discussion. American Journal of Human Genetics, 12(3), 365–372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS)Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre for Human GeneticsBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations