Extended inheritance from an organizational point of view
- 159 Downloads
In this paper, I argue that the increasing data about non-genetic inheritance requires the construction of a new conceptual framework that should complement the inclusive approaches already discussed in the literature. More precisely, I hold that this framework should be epistemologically relevant for evolutionary biologists in capturing the limits of extended inheritance and in reassessing the boundaries of biological systems that transmit traits to their offspring. I outline the first elements of an organizational account of extended inheritance. In this account, the category of inherited factors is neither restricted to genes nor extended to stable resources related to trans-generational similarities. Instead, it includes persisting constitutive elements appearing as difference makers for heterogeneous organizational constraints, namely for heterogeneous constitutive parts whose specific role is to harness flows of matter and energy across generations of clearly delimited extended organized systems. This both inclusive and restrictive framework opens an additional way to apprehend how extended inheritance may affect evolutionary trajectories.
KeywordsExtended inheritance Stable resources Extended organization Persisting organizational constraints
I wish to thank Jean Gayon, Michel Morange, Matteo Mossio, Andrew Mac Farland, James Di Frisco and two anonymous reviewers, whose comments enabled to greatly improve earlier versions of the manuscript. I also thank IHPST and Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne.
- Aizawa, K., & Adams, F. (2009). Why the mind is still in the head. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 78–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bossdorf, O., Richards, C., & Pigliucci, M. (2008). Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecology Letters, 11(2), 106–115.Google Scholar
- Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1882). Rôle des vers de terre dans la formation de la terre végétale, Paris. Hachette Livre, BnF. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56267394.
- Gayon, J. (2000). From measurement to organization: A philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity. In P. Beurton, R. Falk, & H. J. Rheinberger (Eds.), Concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gould, S. J. (1980). Sociobiology and the theory of natural selection. In G. W. Barlow & J. Silverberg (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? (pp. 257–269). Boulder: Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Griesemer, J. (2000). Development, culture, and the units of inheritance. In Philosophy of science, supplement: Proceedings of the 1998 biennial meetings of the philosophy of science association (pp. S348–S368).Google Scholar
- Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 91(6), 277–304 (Cited in Hull, D., & Ruse, M. (Eds.). 1998. The Philosophy of Biology. 117–145).Google Scholar
- Griffiths, P., & Gray, R. (2004). The developmental systems perspective: Organism-environment systems as units of evolution. In K. Preston & M. Pigliucci (Eds.), Phenotypic integration: Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes (pp. 409–431). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, A. A., & Turelli, M. (1997). Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. In S. L. O’Neill, A. A. Hoffmann, & J. H. Werren (Eds.), Influential passengers (pp. 42–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jacob, F. (1970). La logique du vivant, une histoire de l’hérédité (p. 9). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
- Kamra, D. N. (2005). Rumen microbial ecosystem. Current Science, 89(1), 124–135.Google Scholar
- Kant, E. (1993). , Critique de la faculté de juger (pp. 294–303). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
- Lewontin, R. (1983). Gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2001). The beast with five genomes. Natural History, 110(5), 38–41.Google Scholar
- Moreno A. (2014). On the origin of autonomy: from chemical to biological organization. In Oral presentation at the workshop boundaries and levels of biological systems.Google Scholar
- Mossio, M., & Moreno, A. (2010). Organisational closure in biological organisms. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2–3), 269–288.Google Scholar
- Odling-Smee, J., Laland, K., & Feldman, M. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Pocheville, A. (2010). La niche ecologique, concepts, modèles, applications. PhD Thesis, Paris. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00715471/.
- Rosenberg, E., & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. (2008). From bacterial bleaching to the hologenome theory of evolution. In Proceedings of the 11th international coral reef symposium (pp. 273–278). Ft Lauderale, Florida.Google Scholar
- Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Chigaco: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Sterelny, K. (2001). Niche construction, developmental systems and the extended replicator. In S. Oyama, P. Griffiths, & R. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 333–349). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar