Advertisement

Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 277–282 | Cite as

Bullying as an Expression of Intolerant Schemas

  • Alan K. GoodboyEmail author
  • Matthew M. Martin
  • Christine E. Rittenour
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess students’ (N = 186) retrospective accounts of their bullying behaviors (in middle and high school), alongside their current, self-admitted intolerant schemas. Amidst intolerant schemas of sexism, ageism, classism, racism, religious intolerance, and sexual prejudice, all were correlated positively with the victimization of others in school (i.e., relational-verbal bullying, cyberbullying, physical bullying, culture-based bullying). Sexism yielded the strongest associations with bullying, and classism yielded the weakest. Men were more likely to report intolerant schemas and bullying. These findings add to existent theories connecting the cognitive and communicative manifestations of prejudice.

Keywords

Bullying Sexism Ageism Classism Racism Religious intolerance Sexual prejudice 

References

  1. Aboud, F. E., & Joong, A. (2008). Intergroup name-calling and conditions for creating assertive bystanders. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 249–260). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aosved, A. C., & Long, P. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481–492. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aosved, A. C., Long, P. J., & Voller, E. K. (2009). Measuring sexism, racism, sexual prejudice, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance: the intolerant schema measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2321–2354. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00528.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, J. R. (1998). Tolerance/intolerance: A multidisciplinary view of prejudice. In M. L. Hecht (Ed.), Communicating prejudice (pp. 57–86). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 201–216. doi: 10.1177/0829573512450567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowie, H. (2013). The immediate and long term effects of bullying. In I. Rivers & N. Duncan (Eds.), Bullying: Experiences and discourses of sexuality and gender (pp. 10–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, R. D. (2004). The impact of family relationships on school bullies and victims. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161–183). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Farrell, L. C. (2012). The role of cyber and face-to-face verbal bullying on adolescent victims. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 25, 25–36.Google Scholar
  11. Foels, R., & Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: gender and social dominance orientation. Sex Roles, 11, 743–757. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000029094.25107.d6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gini, G. (2007). Who is blameworthy? Social identity and inter-group bullying. School Psychology International, 28, 77–89. doi: 10.1177/0143034307075682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger, M. E., & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements. In National Center for Injury Prevention and Control & C. f. D. C. a. P. a. t. U. S. D. o. Education. (Eds.). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia United States Department of Education Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Ho, A. Y. (2011). Race and ethnicity in peer relations research. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 394–413). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. E. (2002). Peer victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 59–68. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3101_08.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanish, L. D. (2000). The roles of ethnicity and school context in predicting children’s victimization by peers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 201–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1005187201519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hecht, M. L. (1998). Communicating prejudice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, C., Peters, L., & Rapee, R. M. (2012). Development of a measure of the experience of being bullied in youth. Psychological Assessment, 24, 156–165. doi: 10.1037/a0025178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, S. E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Livingstone, A. (2009). Birds of a feather bully together: group processes and children’s responses to bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 853–873. doi: 10.1348/026151008X390267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jordan, K., & Austin, J. (2012). A review of the literature on bullying in U.S. schools and how a parent-educator partnership can be an effective way to handle bullying. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21, 440–458. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2012.675420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kam, J. A., & Bamaca-Colbert, M. Y. (2012). Supportive parenting as a moderator of perceived ethnic/racial discrimination’s associations with psychological and academic adjustment: a comparison between Mexican-origin females in early and middle adolescence. Communication Research, 40, 645–668. doi: 10.1177/0093650212441362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55, 282–288.Google Scholar
  24. Matsunaga, M. (2009). Parents don’t (always) know their children have been bullied: child-parent discrepancy on bullying and family-level profile of communication standards. Human Communication Research, 35, 221–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958-2009.01345.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, J. F., Pitts, M. J., Huber, F. N., Krieger, J. L. R., & Ohs, J. E. (2005). Ageism and ageist language across the life span: intimate relationships and non-intimate interactions. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 287–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00406.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oakes, P. (2003). The root of all evil in intergroup relations? Unearthing the categorization process. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 3-21). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Pörhölä, M., Karhunen, S., & Rainivaara, S. (2006). Bullying at school and in the workplace: A challenge for communication research. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 30, pp. 249–301). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Poteat, V. P., Mereish, E. H., DiGiovanni, C. D., & Scheer, J. R. (2013). Homophobic bullying. In I. Rivers & N. Duncan (Eds.), Bullying: Experiences and discourses of sexuality and gender (pp. 75–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Priest, N., Perry, R., Ferdinand, A., Paradies, Y., & Kelaher, M. (2014). Experiences of racism, racial/ethnic attitudes, motivated fairness and mental health outcomes among primary and secondary school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1672–1687. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0140-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Qureshi, S. (2013). Bullying and racist bullying in schools: What are we missing? Lexington: Xlibris.Google Scholar
  32. Rivers, I. (2001). Retrospective reports of school bullying: stability of recall and its implications for research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 129–142. doi: 10.1348/026151001166001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothon, C., Head, J., Klineberg, E., & Stansfeld, S. (2011). Can social support protect bullied adolescents froma dverse outcomes?: A prospective study on the effects of bullying on educational achievement and mental health of adolescents and secondary schools in East London. Journal of Adolescence. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.007.
  34. Scherr, T. G., & Larson, J. (2010). Bullying dynamics associated with race, ethnicity, and immigration status. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 223–234). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Schuster, B. (1999). Outsiders at school: the prevalence of bullying and its relation to social status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 175–190. doi: 10.1177/1368430299022005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schütz, H., & Six, B. (1996). How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 441–462. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00028-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173–211). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, P. K. (2012). Bullying in primary and secondary schools: Psychological and organizational comparisons. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 137–150). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, P. K., & Slonje, R. (2012). Cyberbullying: The nature and extent of a new kind of bullying, in and out of school. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 249–262). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Swearer, S. M., Collins, A., Radliff, K. H., & Wang, C. (2011). Internalizing problems in students involved in bullying and victimization. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American schools (pp. 45–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Thomae, M., & Viki, G. T. (2013). Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humor on men’s rape proclivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7, 250–269. doi: 10.1037/h0099198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2011). Why does being bullied hurt so much? Insights from neuroscience. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American schools (pp. 23–33). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Willer, E. K., & Soliz, J. (2010). Face needs, intragroup status, and women’s reactions to socially aggressive face threats. Personal Relationships, 17, 557–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01297.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan K. Goodboy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew M. Martin
    • 1
  • Christine E. Rittenour
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations