Advertisement

Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 323–339 | Cite as

Is There Such Thing as ‘Populist Constitutionalism’? The Case of Hungary

  • Gábor Halmai
Original Paper
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

The paper deals with recent deviations from the shared values of constitutionalism towards a kind of ‘populist, illiberal constitutionalism’ introduced by Hungary’s new constitution in 2011. The populism of FIDESZ was directed against all elites, including the ones that designed the 1989 constitutional system (in which FIDESZ also participated), claiming that it was time for a new revolution. This is why PM Viktor Orbán characterized the results of the 2010 elections as a ‘revolution of the ballot boxes’. His intention with this revolution was to eliminate all checks and balances, and even the parliamentary rotation of governing parties. His vision for a new constitutional order—one in which his political party occupies the centre stage of Hungarian political life and puts an end to debates over values—has now been entrenched in the new constitution. The paper argues that this current Hungarian constitutional system was made possible by FIDESZ’ anti-pluralist nationalist populism, but is not necessarily based on a true commitment to expressing the will of the people via ‘illiberal constitutionalism’. The populist government rather misuses the country’s lack of constitutional culture. Adherence to constitutional patriotism would mean that FIDESZ would have to endorse what John Rawls once called ‘constitutional essentials’. The core of this kind of constitutional patriotism is a constitutional culture centred on universalist liberal democratic norms and values. Instead, the current Hungarian constitutional system is confronted with unconstitutional patriotism, a kind of nationalism that violates constitutional essentials in the name of ‘national constitutional identity’.

Keywords

Populism Constitutionalism Illiberal democracy Hungary East-Central Europe 

References

  1. Ackerman, Bruce. 2007. The Failure of the Founding Fathers. Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akkerman, Tjistke. 2017. “Authoritarian Nationalism, Not Populism Is Real Threat to Democracy.” Social Euope. 9 August.Google Scholar
  3. Albert, Richard. 2008. “Counterconstitutionalism’, l, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008, p. 4.” Dalhousie Law Journa 31(1).Google Scholar
  4. Altemeyer, Bob. 1998. The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30: 47–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avineri, Shlomo. 2009. Two Decades After the Fall: Between Utopian Hopes and the Burdens of History. Dissent, 30 September.Google Scholar
  6. Bergsson, Baldvin Thor. 2018. The Constitution As a Political Tool in Iceland: From the Periphery to the Center in the Political Debate. In Constitutional Acceleration Within the European Union and Beyond, ed. Paul Blokker. Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Blokker, Paul. 2013. New Democracies in Crises? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Blokker, Paul. Forthcoming. Populist Constitutionalism. In Routledge Handbook on Global Populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Blokker, Paul. 2017. Populism as a Constitutional Project. ‘Public law and New Populism’ Workshop. NYU School of Law.Google Scholar
  10. Bohle, Dorothee, and Béla Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  11. Brettschneider, Corry. 2015. Popular Constitutionalism contra populism. Constitutional Commentary. Google Scholar
  12. Bugaric, Bojan. 2017. The Populist at the Gates: Constitutional Democracy Under Siege? Public Law and the New Populism. New York University School of Law, Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law and Justice.Google Scholar
  13. Corrias, Luigi. 2016. Populism in Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity. European Constitutional Law Review 12: 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corso, Lucia. 2014. What Does Populism have to Do with Constitutional Law? Discussing Populist Constitutionalism and Its Assumptions.” Rivista di filosofia del Diritto 443–469.Google Scholar
  15. Dawson, James, and Seán Hanley. 2016. What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? The Fading Mirage of the Liberal Consensus. Journal of Democracy 7: 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Eramo, Marco. 2017. They, The People. New Left Review 103: 129–138.Google Scholar
  17. Fusaro, Carlo, and Dawn Oliver. 2011. Towards a Theory of Constitutional Change. In How Constitutions Change—A Comparative Study, ed. Carlo Fusaro and Dawn Oliver. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Gardbaum, Stephen. 2013. The Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gavison, Ruth. 2017. What Is the State of Democracy? How to Defend It? ICONnectblog. 26 August.Google Scholar
  20. Ginsburg, Tom, and Alberto Simpser. 2014. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Halmai, Gábor. 2017. From a Pariah to a Model? Hungary’s Rise to an Illiberal Member State of the EU. European Yearbook of Human Rights 35–45.Google Scholar
  22. Halmai, Gábor. 2018. The Abuse of Constitutional Identity The Hungarian Constitutional Court on the Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law. Review of Central and East European Law 43: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harel, Alon. 2017. The Triumph of Israeli Populism. ICONnectblog. 22 August.Google Scholar
  24. Hiebert, Janet. 2006. Parliamentary Bill of Rights. An Alternative Model? Modern Law Review 69: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes, Stephen. 2012. Constitutions and Constitutionalism. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó, 189–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2010. Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, August.Google Scholar
  28. Kavanagh, Aileen. 2016. The Lure and the Limits of Dialogue. University of Toronto Law Journal 84.Google Scholar
  29. Krastev, Ivan. 2007. Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus. Journal of Democracy 18: 56–63.Google Scholar
  30. Kumm, Mattias. 2017. Demokratie als verfassungsfeindlicher Topos. Verfassungsblog on Matters Constitutional. 6 September.Google Scholar
  31. Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Landau, David. 2013. Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review 47: 189–260.Google Scholar
  33. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucian A. Way. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2010. Competetive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. CUP: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lilla, Mark. 2016. The End of Identity Liberalism. The New York Times, November 18, 2016.Google Scholar
  36. Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser Cristóbal. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mudde, Cass, and Christóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48: 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2014. The People Must be Extracted from Within the People: Reflections on Populism. Constellations 21: 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016a. The Problem with ‘Illiberal Democracy’. Project Syndicate. 21 January.Google Scholar
  40. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016b. The Problem With “Illiberal Democracy”. Project Syndicate, 21 January.Google Scholar
  41. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016c. What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2017. Taking “Illiberal Democracy” Seriously. Public Seminar, 21 July.Google Scholar
  43. Müller, Ja-Werner. 2007. Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Offe, Claus. 1994. Designing Institutions for East European Transitions. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Parker, Richard D. 1993. ‘Here, the People Rule’: A Constitutional Populist Manifesto. Valparaiso University Law Review 27(3): 531–584.Google Scholar
  46. Pinelli, Cesare. 2016. The Populist Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. European Constitutional Law Review 7(01): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Preuss, Ulrich K. 1993. Constitutional Revolution. The Link Between Constitutionalism and Progress. London: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  48. Roach, Kent. 2004. Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics, 23 Supreme Court Law Review, second series, 49.Google Scholar
  49. Remnick, David. 2017. A Conversation with Mark Lilla on His Critique of Identity Politics. The New Yorker, 25 August.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, Michel. 2001. The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy. Southern California Law Review 74: 1307–1352.Google Scholar
  51. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2005. Transitional Constitutionalism: Simplistic and Fancy Theories. In Rethinking the Rule of Law After Communism, ed. Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier, and Wojciech Sadurski, 9–24. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schiefer, D., J. van der Noll, J. Delhey and K. Boehnke. 2013. Cohesion Radar: Measuring Cohesiveness, Bertelsmann Foundation. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/en/media/xcms_bst_dms_36378__2.pdf.
  53. Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Constitutional Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sierakowski, Slawomir. 2016. The Illiberal International. Social Europe, 13 September.Google Scholar
  55. Stopler, Gila. 2017. Constitutional Capture in Israel. ICONnect. 21 August.Google Scholar
  56. Suiter, Jane, David M. Farrell, and Clodagh Harris. 2018. Ireland’s Evolving Constitution. In Constitutional Acceleration Within the European Union and Beyond, ed. Paul Blokker, 142–154. Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Taub, Amanda. 2016. “The Rise of American Authoritarianism.” Vox, 1 March.Google Scholar
  58. Thio, Li-ann. 2012. Constitutionalism in Illiberal Polities. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tushnet, Mark. 2003. Alternative Forms of Judicial Review. Michigan law Review 101: 2781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tushnet, Mark. 2013. Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Harvard Public Law Working Paper no. 13-47. Google Scholar
  61. Tushnet, Mark. 2016. Varieties of Constitutionalism. ICON 14: 1–5.Google Scholar
  62. Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. Yale Law Journal 115: 1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Welzel, Christian. 2013. Freedom Rising. Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilkinson, Michael. 2013. The Specter of Authoritarian Liberalism: Reflections on the Constitutional Crisis of the European Union. German Law Review 14: 527.Google Scholar
  65. Young, Alison L. 2009. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European University InstituteFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations