Advertisement

Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 315–329 | Cite as

Ethnography and the Internet: Taking Account of Emerging Technological Landscapes

  • Christine Hine
Original Paper
  • 687 Downloads

Abstract

This article explores the strengths of ethnography as a methodology for exploring the complex social landscape of the contemporary Internet. The article outlines the historical development of the Internet, from Web 1.0 to a participatory Web 2.0 embedded within everyday life and ultimately to the prospect of an autonomous Internet of Things. The benefits of an ethnographic approach for understanding such developments in depth and examining taken-for-granted assumptions are outlined alongside an account of some of the challenges that digital technologies pose for an ethnographic methodology. Amongst these challenges are the difficulties inherent in mapping out a field site that effectively captures the complexity of online/offline connections and of developing a sufficient degree of immersion and co-presence for a rich understanding to be attained. Finally, the challenges offered by the emergence of mobile Internet, algorithmic filtering of information and unpredictable flows of data are explored. It is suggested that the ethnographer of the Internet can usefully position their task as being to explore a socially constructed yet technologically mediated landscape, immersing themselves in it, interrogating how others experience it and mapping the ways in which it becomes meaningful to those who navigate its complexities.

Keywords

Internet Ethnography Social media Participant observation Methodology Community Internet of Things Field site Landscape Algorithm 

References

  1. Baym, N. 1995. The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In Cybersociety, ed. S. Jones, 138–163. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Baym, N.K. 2000. Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Baym, N.K. 2007. The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday 12 (8). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1978/1853.
  4. Beaulieu, A. and E. Simakova 2006. Textured connectivity: an ethnographic approach to understanding the timescape of hyperlinks. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics 10. http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v10i1p5.html.
  5. Bengtsson, S. 2014. Faraway, so close! Proximity and distance in ethnography online. Media, Culture and Society 36 (6): 862–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatt, I., and R. de Roock. 2014. Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology 21 (4): 21281.Google Scholar
  7. Blank, G., and B.C. Reisdorf. 2012. The participatory web. Information, Communication & Society 15 (4): 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boellstorff, T. 2008. Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boellstorff, T. 2010. A typology of ethnographic scales for virtual worlds. In Online Worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual, ed. W.S. Bainbridge, 123–133. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burrell, J. 2009. The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods 21 (2): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, E. G. 2010. Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology 39(1): 487–505. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945.
  12. Cooper, G., C. Hine, J. Rachel, and S. Woolgar. 1995. Ethnography and human-computer interaction. In The social and interactional dimensions of human–computer interfaces, ed. P.J. Thomas, 11–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dirksen, V., A. Huizing, and B. Smit. 2010. ‘Piling on layers of understanding’: the use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices. New Media & Society 12 (7): 1045–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebeling, M.F.E. 2016. Healthcare and big data: Digital specters and phantom objects. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farnsworth, J., and T. Austrin. 2010. The ethnography of new media worlds? Following the case of global poker. New Media & Society 12 (7): 1120–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia, A.C., A.I. Standlee, J. Bechkoff, and Y. Cui. 2009. Ethnographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (1): 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geiger, R.S., and D. Ribes 2011. Trace ethnography: following coordination through documentary practices. In: Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society: 1–10.Google Scholar
  18. Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hine, C. 2000. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hine, C. 2007. Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/hine.html.
  21. Hine, C. 2008. How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In Internet inquiry: Conversations about method, ed. A.N. Markham, and N. Baym, 1–20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Hine, C. 2011. Towards ethnography of television on the internet: A mobile strategy for exploring mundane interpretive activities. Media, Culture and Society 33 (4): 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hine, C. 2015. Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Horst, H.A., and D. Miller. 2013. Digital anthropology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Howard, P.N. 2002. Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society 4 (4): 550–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lahlou, S. 2011. How can we capture the subject’s perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information 50 (3–4): 607–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leander, K.M., and K.K. Mckim. 2003. Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information 3 (2): 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lievrouw, L.A. 2012. The next decade in Internet time: Ways ahead for new media studies. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 616–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcus, G. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marcus, G.E. 2012. Multi-sited ethnography. Five or six things I know about it now. In Multi-sited ethnography: problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods, ed. S. Coleman, and P. von Hellermann, 16–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Markham, A.N. 1998. Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mason, J. 2011. Facet methodology: The case for an inventive research orientation. Methodological Innovations Online 6(3): 75–92. http://www.pbs.plym.ac.uk/mi/pdf/8-02-12/MIO63Paper31.pdf.
  34. Miller, D. 2011. Tales from facebook. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, D., and D. Slater. 2000. The internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  36. O’Reilly, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Retrieved 10 Feb 2011
  37. Paccagnella, L. 1997. Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.
  38. Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi. 2015. Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Postill, J. and S. Pink 2012. Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy: quarterly journal of media research and resources(145): 123–134.Google Scholar
  40. Star, S.L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stefik, M. 1997. Internet dreams: Archetypes, myths, and metaphors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations