Responding to Climate-Related Security Risks: Reviewing Regional Organizations in Asia and Africa
Purpose of Review
This paper presents new insight on the approaches and ability to respond to climate-related security risks in four regional intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) in Asia and Africa—ASEAN (South East Asia), SAARC (South Asia), ECOWAS (West Africa), and IGAD (East Africa).
IGOs are becoming increasingly important in responding to climate-related security risks, given the transnational character of these risks. Previous research has primarily focused on Western-based IGOs, whereas more attention is needed on IGOs in fragile and developing regions to increase our understanding of the emerging challenges and to take adequate measurements to mitigate climate-related security risks.
We show that the regional security context and vulnerability to climate change affects the framing of climate-related security risks, and that the risks identified often relate to livelihood conditions and development, rather than state security. Measurements are taken, but the key challenge remains the implementation of these policies.
KeywordsClimate-related security risks Intergovernmental organizations Climate change Security
Compliance of ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.•• Dellmuth LM, Gustafsson M-T, Bremberg N, Mobjörk M. Intergovernmental organizations and climate security: advancing the research agenda. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang. 2018:e496 This is the first comprehensive review of the literature on IGOs responses to climate-related security risks. Google Scholar
- 4.Bremberg N. European regional organizations and climate-related security risks: EU, OSCE and NATO. sipri.org. Solna; 2018.
- 5.Mobjörk M, Gustafsson M-T, Sonnsjö H, van Baalen S, Dellmuth LM, Bremberg N. Climate-related security risks. Solna: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute; 2016.Google Scholar
- 9.•• Conca K, Thwaites J, Lee G. Climate change and the UN Security Council: bully pulpit or bull in a China shop? Global Environ Polit. 2017;17:1–20 This article presents and discusses six proposals derived from academic and policy literature on what actions the UN Security Council could take on climate-related security risks. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hall N. Moving beyond its mandate? UNHCR and climate change displacement. J Int Org Stud. 2013;4:91–108.Google Scholar
- 12.Adger WN, Barnett J, Hovelsrud GK, Levy MA, Spring ÚO, Vogel CH. 12 human security. Climate change impacts, Adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: ipcc.ch; 2014. p. 755–91.Google Scholar
- 15.Dalby S. Security and environmental change. Cambridge: Polity; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.Ruttinger L, Smith D, Stang G, Tänzler D, Vivekananda J. A new climate for peace. adelphi, International Alert, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, European Union Institute for Security Studies; 2015 pp. 1–172.Google Scholar
- 17.German Advisory Council on Global Change. Climate change as a security risk. London and Sterling: Earthscan; 2007.Google Scholar
- 18.Barnett J. Security and climate change. Global environmental change. Pergamon. 2003;13:7–17.Google Scholar
- 21.Gilmore EA. Introduction to special issue: disciplinary perspectives on climate change and conflict. Curr Clim Change Rep [Internet]. 2017;3:193–9. Available from: https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.its.uu.se/article/10.1007/s40641-017-0081-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.McDonald M. Climate change and security: towards ecological security? International Theory. Cambridge University Press. 2018;10:153–80.Google Scholar
- 24.Steinbruner JD, Stern PC, Husbands JL. Climate and social stress: implications for security analysis. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 27.• Floyd R. Global climate security governance: a case of institutional and ideational fragmentation. Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 15. Abingdon: Routledge; 2015. p. 119–46. This article critically scrutinizes the institutional fragmentation of global security governance. Google Scholar
- 29.Displacement HN. Development, and Climate Change. London: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
- 30.Kelman I. Climate Change and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2nd ed. Beijing Normal University Press; 2015;6:117–27.Google Scholar
- 31.Magnan AK, Schipper ELF, Burkett M, Bharwani S, Burton I, Eriksen S, et al. Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 2016;7:646–65.Google Scholar
- 32.Swatuk LA, Wirkus L, Krampe F, Thomas BK, da Silva LPB. Introduction: theorizing the boomerang effect, Larry Swatuk, Lars Wirkus, Florian Krampe, Bejoy K. Thomas, Luis Paulo Batista da Silva. Water, Climate Change and the Boomerang Effect: Unintentional Consequences for Resource Insecurity. Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar
- 34.George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 35.Haas PM. Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. Int. Org. Cambridge University Press. 1989;43:377–403.Google Scholar
- 39.Krampe F, Scassa R, Mitrotta G. Responses to climate-related security risks: regional organizations in Asia and Africa. SIPRI Insights in Peace and Security [Internet]. Solna: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute; 2018. Available from: https://www.sipri.org/publications/2018/sipri-insights-peace-and-security/responses-climate-related-security-risks-regional-organizations-asia-and-africa
- 42.van Baalen S, Mobjörk M. Climate Change and Violent Conflict in East Africa: integrating qualitative and quantitative research to probe the mechanisms. Int Stud Rev [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/isr/vix043/4616607?redirectedFrom=fulltext
- 43.Krampe F, Swain A. Human development and minority empowerment. In: Richmond OP, Pogodda S, Ramovic J, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace. Basingstoke; 2016.Google Scholar