Advertisement

Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 423–427 | Cite as

Electromagnetism and plant development: a new unknown in a known world

  • João Paulo Ribeiro-OliveiraEmail author
Article
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

How does the new affect the old but mutable living systems? This is the question that electromagnetism stress has been provoking. There are many evidence that non-ionic radiation can affect animal cells since their plasticity is limited when compared to plants. However, the way plants perceive and process this stressor is still poorly understood. So here are some intriguing facts that lead us to reflect on how and why electromagnetism can become a very common stressor for years to come for plant species.

Keywords

Global change Plant abiotic stress Plant behaviour Non-ionic radiation Silent pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for a scholarship; to the Programa de Pós-Graduacão em Agronomia (UFU) for the support currently given to me as a Post-doctoral (PNPD); to Professor Marli A. Ranal for criticism and support; to Mr. Roger Hutchings for suggestions and the English review of the manuscript; and to the anonymous reviewer for the important observations on the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declare that he has no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Balmori A (2009) Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology 16:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmori A (2015) Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation. Sci Total Environ 518:58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts RA, Alfieri L, Knight JR, Bradshaw C, Caesar J, Feyen L, Friedlingstein P, Gohar L, Koutroulis A, Lewis K, Morfopoulos C, Papadimitrou L, Richardson KJ, Tsanis L, Wyser K (2018) Changes in climate extremes, fresh water availability and vulnerability to food insecurity projected at global warming with a higher-resolution global climate model. Philos Trans R Soc A.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulak P, Lata L, Plak A, Wiącek D, Strobel W, Walkiewicz A, Pietruszewski S, Bieganowski A (2018) Electromagnetic field pretreatment of Sinapis alba seeds improved cadmium phytoextraction. Inter J Phytoremediat 20:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL (2009) Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manage 29:2587–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dannehl D (2018) Effects of electricity on plant responses. Sci Hortic 234:382–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta A, Singh R, Lehana P (2013) Effect of microwaves treated soil on growth of mustard plants. IJSCE 3:2231–2307Google Scholar
  8. Gustavino B, Carboni G, Petrillo R, Paoluzzi G, Santovetti E, Rizzoni M (2015) Exposure to 915 MHz radiation induces micronuclei in Vicia faba root tips. Mutagenesis 31:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halgamuge MN (2017) Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants. Electromagn Biol Med 36:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hänninen O, Huttunen P, Ekman R (2011) Electromagnetic irradiation exposure and its bioindication—an overview. J Environ Sci 23:1409–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kouzmanova M, Dimitrova M, Dragolova D, Atanasova G, Atanasov N (2009) Alterations in enzyme activities in leaves after exposure of Plectranthus sp. plants to 900 MHz electromagnetic field. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 23:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kranner I, Minibayeva FV, Beckett RP, Seal CE (2010) What is stress? Concepts, definitions and applications in seed science. New Phytol 188:655–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mildaziene V, Pauzaite G, Nauciené Z, Malakauskiene A, Zukiene R, Januskaitiene I, Filatova I, Lyushkevich V (2017) Pre-sowing seed treatment with cold plasma and electromagnetic field increases secondary metabolite content in purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea) leaves. Plasma Processes Polym 15:1700059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nguyen D, Rieu I, Mariani C, van Dam NM (2016) How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Mol Biol 91:727–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nyakane NE, Markus ED, Sedibe MM (2019) The effects of magnetic fields on plants growth: a comprehensive review. Int J Food Eng 5:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pall ML (2016) Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. Curr Chem Biol 10:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roda C, Perry S (2014) Mobile phone infrastructure regulation in Europe: scientific challenges and human rights protection. Environ Sci Policy 37:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roux D, Vian A, Girard S, Bonnet P, Paladin F, Davies E, Ledoigt G (2008) High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m − 1) electromagnetic field: a genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta 227:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rusakova A, Nosachev I, Lysenko V, Guo Y, Logvinov A, Kirichenko E, Varduny T, Cherednikov S, Chugueva O (2017) Impact of high strength electromagnetic fields generated by Tesla transformer on plant cell ultrastructure. Inf Process Agric 4:253–258Google Scholar
  21. Selye H (1936) A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature 138(3479):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Selye H (1950) The Physiology and pathology of exposure to stress, a treatise based on the concepts of the general-adaptation-syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. ACTA, Inc., Medical Publishers, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  23. Selye H (1956) The stress of life. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma VP, Singh HP, Kohli RK, Batish DR (2009) Mobile phone radiation inhibits Vigna radiata (mung bean) root growth by inducing oxidative stress. Sci Total Environ 407:5543–5547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soran ML, Stan M, Niinemets Ü, Copolovici L (2014) Influence of microwave frequency electromagnetic radiation on terpene emission and content in aromatic plants. J Plant Physiol 171:1436–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorgucu U, Develi I (2012) Measurement and analysis of electromagnetic pollution generated by GSM-900 mobile phone networks in Erciyes University, Turkey. Electromagn Biol Med 31:404–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stefi AL, Margaritis LH, Christodoulakis NS (2017) The effect of the non-ionizing radiation on exposed, laboratory cultivated maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Flora 233:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinberg CEW (2012) Multiple stressors as environmental realism: synergism or antagonism. In: Steinberg CEW (ed) Stress ecology: environmental stress as ecological driving force and key player in evolution. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutherland WJ, Burchart SHM, Connor B, Culshaw C, Dicks LV, Dinsdale J, Doran H, Entwistle AC, Fleishman E, Gibbons DW, Jiang Z, Keim B, Le Roux X, Lickrish FA, Markillie P, Monk KA, Mortimer D, Pearce-Higgins JW, Peack LS, Pretty J, Seymour CL, Spalding MD, Tonneijch FH, Gleave RA (2018) A 2018 horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation and biological diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 33:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang C, Yang C, Yu H, Tian S, Huang X, Wang W, Cai P (2018) Electromagnetic radiation disturbed the photosynthesis of Microcystis aeruginosa at the proteomics level. Sci Rep 8:479–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trebbi G, Borghini F, Lazzarato L, Torrigiani P, Calzoni GL, Betti L (2007) Extremely low frequency weak magnetic fields enhance resistance of NN tobacco plants to tobacco mosaic virus and elicit stress-related biochemical activities. Bioelectromagnetics 28:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vian A, Davies E, Gendraud M, Bonnet P (2016) Plant responses to high frequency electromagnetic fields. Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1830262 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A (2016) Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations. Sci Total Environ 572:554–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Brazilian Society of Plant Physiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Ciências AgráriasUniversidade Federal de UberlândiaUberlândiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations