Advertisement

DECISION

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 301–319 | Cite as

Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism

  • Ritu SinghEmail author
  • Parikshit Charan
  • Manojit Chattopadhyay
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Resource-based view suggests that dynamic capability is a very powerful resource to improve the firm’s responsiveness in the fast-changing environment. Additionally, organization structures may decrease or increase the effect of dynamic capabilities by providing greater or lesser opportunities. Consequently, this study examines the direct impact of dynamic capabilities on the firm’s responsiveness as well as the moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism on the dynamic capabilities–responsiveness relationship. Using the moderated hierarchical regression method, we analyzed 217 data points collected from Indian service companies to test our hypotheses. The findings suggest that dimensions of dynamic capability: sensing, learning, integration, and reconfiguration capability have significant positive impact on the firm’s responsiveness. The statistical results also suggest that the dynamic capabilities–responsiveness relationship is moderated by the organization structures and environmental dynamism. Moderation results explain that the firm responsiveness is expected to improve if (1) they have strong sensing capability and adopt a less formalized organization structure; (2) they have strong learning capability and a more centralized organization structure; (3) they have a high level of reconfiguration capability and adopt a less specialized organization structure; and (4) they deal with a highly dynamic environment and have a strong sensing capability. The originality of the study lies in exploring the internal alignment with organization structures and external fit with environmental dynamism on the relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm’s responsiveness.

Keywords

Dynamic capabilities Responsiveness Environmental dynamism Organization structures 

Notes

References

  1. Agarwal R, Selen W (2009) Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. Decis Sci 40(3):431–475Google Scholar
  2. Albright KS (2004) Environmental scanning: radar for success. Inf Manag J 38(3):38–45Google Scholar
  3. Ambrosini V, Bowman C (2009) What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int J Manag Rev 11(1):29–49Google Scholar
  4. Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14(1):33–46Google Scholar
  5. Andrews R (2010) Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Hum Relat 63(5):583–608Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402Google Scholar
  7. Asree S, Zain M, Rizal Razalli M (2010) Influence of leadership competency and organizational culture on responsiveness and performance of firms. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 22(4):500–516Google Scholar
  8. Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: an archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad Manag J 43(5):837–853Google Scholar
  9. Augier M, Teece DJ (2008) Strategy as evolution with design: the foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organ Stud 29(8–9):1187–1208Google Scholar
  10. Augier M, Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ Sci 20(2):410–421Google Scholar
  11. Babelytė-Labanauskė K, Nedzinskas Š (2017) Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance. J Model Manag 12(4):603–630Google Scholar
  12. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94Google Scholar
  13. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  14. Beltrán-Martín I, Roca-Puig V, Escrig-Tena A, Bou-Llusar JC (2008) Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. J Manag 34(5):1009–1044Google Scholar
  15. Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FE, De Sanctis I (2017) Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: an Italian study. Int J Prod Res 55(3):769–794Google Scholar
  16. Blome C, Schoenherr T, Rexhausen D (2013) Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Int J Prod Res 51(4):1295–1318Google Scholar
  17. Boyer KK, Lewis MW (2002) Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Prod Oper Manag 11(1):9–20Google Scholar
  18. Bush PD (1987) The theory of institutional change. J Econ Issues 21(3):1075–1116Google Scholar
  19. Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: how capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ Sci 20(2):294–312Google Scholar
  20. Chang L-C, Ho W-L, Tsai S-B, Chen Q, Wu C-C (2017) Dynamic organizational learning: a narrative inquiry into the story of Huawei in China. Asia Pac Bus Rev 23(4):541–558Google Scholar
  21. Choi TY, Krause DR (2006) The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. J Oper Manag 24(5):637–652Google Scholar
  22. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (1983) Applied multiple regression. Correl Anal Behav Sci 2:255–300Google Scholar
  23. Daft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strateg Manag J 9(2):123–139Google Scholar
  24. Dalton DR, Todor WD, Spendolini MJ, Fielding GJ, Porter LW (1980) Organization structure and performance: a critical review. Acad Manag Rev 5(1):49–64Google Scholar
  25. Day GS (1994) The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J Mark 58:37–52Google Scholar
  26. Dean JW Jr, Snell SA (1991) Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia. Acad Manag J 34(4):776–804Google Scholar
  27. Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Adm Sci Q 29(1):52–73Google Scholar
  28. Dwayne Whitten G, Green KW Jr, Zelbst PJ (2012) Triple-A supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32(1):28–48Google Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74Google Scholar
  30. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21:1105–1121Google Scholar
  31. Elenkov DS (1997) Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: the case for institutional influences on scanning behavior. Strateg Manag J 18(4):287–302Google Scholar
  32. Eriksson T (2014) Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scand J Manag 30(1):65–82Google Scholar
  33. Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strateg Manag J 19(12):1193–1201Google Scholar
  34. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122Google Scholar
  35. Gunasekaran A, Lai K, Cheng TCE (2008) Responsive supply chain: a competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 36(4):549–564Google Scholar
  36. Gutierrez-Gutierrez LJ, Barrales-Molina V, Kaynak H (2018) The role of human resource-related quality management practices in new product development: a dynamic capability perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(1):43–66Google Scholar
  37. Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  38. Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strateg Manag J 3(2):159–174Google Scholar
  39. Hazen BT, Bradley RV, Bell JE, In J, Byrd TA (2017) Enterprise architecture: a competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 193:566–577Google Scholar
  40. Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J 24(10):997–1010Google Scholar
  41. Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (N) ever-changing world. Strateg Manag J 32(11):1243–1250Google Scholar
  42. Homburg C, Grozdanovic M, Klarmann M (2007) Responsiveness to customers and competitors: the role of affective and cognitive organizational systems. J Mark 71(3):18–38Google Scholar
  43. Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1993) Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strateg Manag J14(3):215–235Google Scholar
  44. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52(11):1661–1674Google Scholar
  45. Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kyläheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3(3):223–243Google Scholar
  46. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360Google Scholar
  47. Ju K-J, Park B, Kim T (2016) Causal relationship between supply chain dynamic capabilities, technological innovation, and operational performance. Manag Prod Eng Rev 7(4):6–15Google Scholar
  48. Kim G, Shin B, Kim KK, Lee HG (2011) IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. J Assoc Inf Syst 12(7):487Google Scholar
  49. Kirchhoff BA (1994) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism: the economics of business firm formation and growth. ABC-CLIO, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  50. Kwon SJ, Ryu D, Park E (2018) The influence of entrepreneurs’strategic agility and dynamic capability on the opportunity pursuit process of new ventures: evidence from South Korea. Acad Strateg Manag J 17(1):1–17Google Scholar
  51. Lee HL (2004) The triple-A supply chain. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):102–113Google Scholar
  52. Lee KL, Low GT (2016) Leadership styles and organisational citizenship behaviour: role ambiguity as a mediating construct. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 24(4):1557–1577Google Scholar
  53. Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall ML (2011) Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 21(3):243–255Google Scholar
  54. Liao J, Welsch H, Stoica M (2003) Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: an empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs. Entrep Theory Pract 28(1):63–86Google Scholar
  55. Lin Y, Wu L-Y (2014) Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. J Bus Res 67(3):407–413Google Scholar
  56. Makkonen H, Pohjola M, Olkkonen R, Koponen A (2014) Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. J Bus Res 67(1):2707–2719Google Scholar
  57. Martínez Sánchez A, Pérez Pérez M (2005) Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: a conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(7):681–700Google Scholar
  58. Miller GJ, Smith RW (1993) Managerial dilemmas: the political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Newbert SL, Gopalakrishnan S, Kirchhoff BA (2008) Looking beyond resources: exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries. Technovation 28(1–2):6–19Google Scholar
  60. Nieves J, Quintana A, Osorio J (2016) Organizational knowledge, dynamic capabilities and innovation in the hotel industry. Tour Hosp Res 16(2):158–171Google Scholar
  61. Nolsøe Grünbaum N, Stenger M (2013) Dynamic capabilities: Do they lead to innovation performance and profitability? IUP J Bus Strategy 10(4):68–85Google Scholar
  62. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory (McGraw-Hill series in psychology). McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Pan G, Pan S-L, Lim C-Y (2015) Examining how firms leverage IT to achieve firm productivity: RBV and dynamic capabilities perspectives. Inf Manag 52(4):401–412Google Scholar
  64. Patel PC, Terjesen S, Li D (2012) Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity. J Oper Manag 30(3):201–220Google Scholar
  65. Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2011) Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decis Sci 42(1):239–273Google Scholar
  66. Payne RL, Mansfield R (1973) Relationships of perceptions of organizational climate to organizational structure, context, and hierarchical position. Adm Sci Q 18(4):515–526Google Scholar
  67. Pehrsson T, Ghannad N, Pehrsson A, Abt T, Chen S, Erath F, Hammarstig T (2015) Dynamic capabilities and performance in foreign markets: developments within international new ventures. J Int Entrep 13(1):28–48Google Scholar
  68. Peteraf MA, Barney JB (2003) Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Manag Decis Econ 24(4):309–323Google Scholar
  69. Pinho JC, Prange C (2016) The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. J World Bus 51(3):391–403Google Scholar
  70. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544Google Scholar
  71. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879Google Scholar
  72. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569Google Scholar
  73. Porter ME (1985) Creating and sustaining superior performance. Compet Advant 167:33–59Google Scholar
  74. Prajogo DI (2016) The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. Int J Prod Econ 171:241–249Google Scholar
  75. Pratt JW, Zeckhauser R, Arrow KJ (1985) Principals and agents: the structure of business. Harvard Business Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  76. Ravichandran T (2000) Swiftness and intensity of administrative innovation adoption: an empirical study of TQM in information systems. Decis Sci 31(3):691–724Google Scholar
  77. Ray S, Cardozo R (1996) Sensitivity and creativity in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: a framework for empirical investigation. In: Sixth global entrepreneurship research conference, Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Richard H, Tolbert P (2005) Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Rizzo JR, House RJ, Lirtzman SI (1970) Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Adm Sci Q 15(2):150–163Google Scholar
  80. Sappington DEM (1991) Incentives in principal-agent relationships. J Econ Perspect 5(2):45–66Google Scholar
  81. Sarkar S, Coelho DM, Maroco J (2016) Strategic orientations, dynamic capabilities, and firm performance: an analysis for knowledge intensive business services. J Knowl Econ 7(4):1000–1020Google Scholar
  82. Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strateg Manag J 35(2):179–203Google Scholar
  83. Schilke O, Hu S, Helfat CE (2018) Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Acad Manag Ann 12(1):390–439Google Scholar
  84. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):273–292Google Scholar
  85. Stalk G (1988) Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Bus Rev 66:41–51Google Scholar
  86. Su H, Linderman K (2016) An empirical investigation in sustaining high-quality performance. Decis Sci 47:787–819Google Scholar
  87. Swink M, Narasimhan R, Kim SW (2005) Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance. Decis Sci 36(3):427–457Google Scholar
  88. Tallott M, Hilliard R (2016) Developing dynamic capabilities for learning and internationalization: a case study of diversification in an SME. Baltic J Manag 11(3):328–347Google Scholar
  89. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350Google Scholar
  90. Teece DJ (2014) The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Acad Manag Perspect 28(4):328–352Google Scholar
  91. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533Google Scholar
  92. Tsang N, Qu H (2000) Service quality in China’s hotel industry: a perspective from tourists and hotel managers. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 12(5):316–326Google Scholar
  93. Verona G, Ravasi D (2003) Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Ind Corp Change 12(3):577–606Google Scholar
  94. Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):31–51Google Scholar
  95. Wanous JP, Hudy MJ (2001) Single-item reliability: a replication and extension. Organ Res Methods 4(4):361–375Google Scholar
  96. Webb D, Pettigrew A (1999) The temporal development of strategy: Patterns in the UK insurance industry. Organ Sci 10(5):601–621Google Scholar
  97. Wei YS, Wang Q (2011) Making sense of a market information system for superior performance: the roles of organizational responsiveness and innovation strategy. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):267–277Google Scholar
  98. Will M (2019) Organizational structures for Tech Firms.  In: Mellor R (ed) Management for Scientists. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 49–64 Google Scholar
  99. Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995Google Scholar
  100. Wu SJ, Melnyk SA, Flynn BB (2010) Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient. Decis Sci 41(4):721–754Google Scholar
  101. Yu TF (2001) Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. Int J Manag Rev 3(3):185–197Google Scholar
  102. Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar
  103. Zheng S, Zhang W, Du J (2011) Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1035–1051Google Scholar
  104. Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strateg Manag J 31(5):547–561Google Scholar
  105. Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag 22(3):265–289Google Scholar
  106. Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Management Calcutta 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Operations Management AreaIndian Institute of Management (IIM) RaipurRaipurIndia
  2. 2.Decision Science and Systems AreaIndian Institute of Management (IIM) RaipurRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations