Advertisement

DECISION

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 321–333 | Cite as

Human–wildlife conflicts in the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve and the politics of forest conservation

  • Amrita SenEmail author
Research Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify the politics of forest conservation—processes through which formal stewardship methods are legally enforced circumventing customary community rights to the forests. Drawing on an ethnographic fieldwork conducted in the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve of West Bengal, this paper discusses the ways in which such bureaucratic provisions of forest conservation shapes ideologies about human–wildlife conflicts in India. The paper draws on empirical lessons and provides observations on the different kinds of forest notifications and their impacts on the customary rights of the forest-dependent communities in the Sundarbans. Although it has been widely established that forest conservation adversely impacts local livelihoods and results in dispossession from subsistence resources, it is indeed imperative to understand that in legitimising forested landscapes as ‘protected’ and inviolate, survival of different communities is also at stake.

Keywords

Forest notifications Human–wildlife conflicts Neoliberalism Politics Sundarbans 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges funding from the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Banerjee A (1998) Environment, population and human settlements of Sundarban Delta. Concept Publishing, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett C (2005) The consolations of’neoliberalism’. Geoforum 36(1):7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhargava M (2002) Forests, people and state: continuities and changes. Econ Polit Wkly 37(43):4440–4446Google Scholar
  4. Brockington D, Igoe J (2007) Neoliberal conservation: a brief introduction. Conserv Soc 5(4):432–449Google Scholar
  5. Büscher B (2013) Nature on the move: the value and circulation of liquid nature and the emergence of fictitious conservation. New Propos: J Marxism Interdiscip Inquiry 6(1/2):20–36Google Scholar
  6. Chacraverti S (2014) The Sundarbans fishers: coping in an overly stressed mangrove estuary. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF), ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakrabarti R (2010) Local people and the global tiger: an environmental history of the Sundarbans. Glob Environ 3:72–95Google Scholar
  8. Danda AA, Sriskanthan G (2011) Indian Sundarban delta: a vision. World Wide Fund for Nature, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson J (2010) The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode 41(S1):166–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fletcher R (2010) Neoliberal environmentality: towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conserv Soc 8(3):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher R (2012) Using the master’s tools? Neoliberal conservation and the evasion of inequality. Dev Change 43(1):295–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fletcher R, Dressler WH, Anderson ZR, Buscher B (2019) Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal politics. J Peasant Stud 46(5):1068–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh A, Boyd E (2018) Unlocking knowledge-policy action gaps in disaster-recovery-risk governance cycle: a governmentality approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 39:101236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosh A, Schmidt S, Fickert T, Nusser M (2015) The Indian Sundarban mangrove forests: history, utilization, conservation strategies and local perception. Diversity 7(2):149–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guha R (1989) The unquiet woods: ecological change and peasant resistance in the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunter WW (1875) A statistical account of Bengal: district of the 24 Parganas and Sundarbans. Trubner & co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Jalais A (2010) Forest of tigers: people, politics and environment in the Sundarbans. Routledge, New Delhi and AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  18. Johari R (2007) Of paper tigers and invisible people: the cultural politics of natural resource in Sariska. In: Shahabuddin G, Rangarajan M (eds) Making conservation work: securing biodiversity in this new century. Permanent Black, Uttaranchal, pp 48–77Google Scholar
  19. Mallick N (2014) Control of human tiger conflict in Sundarban tiger reserve. Available at www.teriuniversity.ac.in/mct/pdf/assignment/NILANJAN-MALLICK.pdf. Accessed on 03 Feb 2017
  20. Naskar KY, Mukherjee S, Ghosh A (2012) Sundarbans tiger reserve in West Bengal: the facts and figures. In: Mukherjee SK, Maity GG (eds) Proceedings of the International seminar on multidisciplinary approaches in angiosperm systematics, pp 541–553Google Scholar
  21. Peluso NL (1993) Coercing conservation: the politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Change 3(2):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Randeria S (2003) Between cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: dilemmas of social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources. Eur J Sociol 43(1):27–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rangarajan M, Shahabuddin G (2006) Displacement and relocation from protected areas: towards a biological and historical synthesis. Conserv Soc 4(3):359–378Google Scholar
  24. Richards JF, Flint EP (1990) Long term transformations in the Sundarbans wetland forests of Bengal. Agric Hum Values 7(2):17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seidensticker J, Lahiri RK, Das KC, Wright A (1976) Problem tiger in the Sundarbans. J Fauna Preserv Soc 8(3):267–273Google Scholar
  26. Sen A, Pattanaik S (2015) Alienation, conflict and conservation in the protected areas of urban metropolis: a case study of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. Sociol Bull 64(3):375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen A, Pattanaik S (2019) The political agenda of implementing Forest Rights Act 2006: evidences from Indian Sundarban. Environ Dev Sustain 21(5):2355–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shahabuddin G (2019) The tiger’s last stand: challenges for protected area management in Sariska. Econ Polit Wkly 54(30):15–18Google Scholar
  29. Sivaramakrishnan K (2000) Crafting the public sphere in the forests of West Bengal: democracy, development and political action. Am Ethnol 27(2):431–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. STR (Sundarban Tiger Reserve) (2014) Annual report 2013–2014. Retrieved from www.sundarbantigerreserve.org/news/Annual%20Report%202013-14.pdf
  31. Tucker RP (1991) Resident people and wildlife reserves in India: the pre history of a strategy. In: West PC, Brechin SR (eds) Resident peoples and national parks: social dilemmas and strategies in international conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tuscan, pp 40–50Google Scholar
  32. Vasan S (2018) Consuming the tiger: experiencing neoliberal nature. Conserv Soc 16(4):481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Management Calcutta 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations