Advertisement

DECISION

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 313–323 | Cite as

Informational efficiency of sovereign bond markets of India and China: evidence from Toda and Yamamoto Granger causality (1995)

  • Shariq Ahmad BhatEmail author
Research Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The study analyzes the causal relationship between macroeconomic indicators and sovereign bond indices of India and China. The main purpose of this research study is to answer the question how sovereign yields of bond indices in India and China reflects economic conditions and if sovereign bond market of India and China are informationally efficient. Toda and Yamamoto (J Econom 66:225–250, 1995) approach is used for testing Granger causality. Bivariate analysis is performed on monthly data from January 2000 to December 2016, and four macroeconomic indicators are examined such as interest rate, exchange rate, gross domestic product and fiscal deficit. Analysis applies unit root test to check maximal order of integration, VAR lag order selection criteria to check maximum lag order and Wald test for linear restrictions to examine Granger causality.

Keywords

Sovereign bond markets Informational efficiency Toda and Yamamoto 1995 Macroeconomic variables India and China 

References

  1. Bachelier L (1900) Théorie de la spéculation. Gauthier-Villars. Annales Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normale Superieure Ser 3(17):21–86Google Scholar
  2. Bajaj M, Vijh A (1990) Dividend clienteles and the information content of dividend changes. J Financial Econ 26:193–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard V, Thomas J (1989) Post-earnings-announcement drift: delayed price response or risk premium? J Account Res 27:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black F, Scholes M (1974) The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. J Financial Econ 1(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SJ, Goetzmann WN (1995) Performance persistence. J Finance 50(2):679–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell JY, Shiller RJ (1988) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Rev Financial Stud 1(3):195–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cargill TF (1975) The term structure of interest rates: a test of the expectations hypothesis. J Finance 30(3):761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopra N, Lakonishok J, Ritter JR (1992) Measuring abnormal performance: Do stocks overreact? J Financial Econ 31(2):235–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copeland T (1979) Liquidity changes following stock splits. J Finance 34:115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowles A, Jone HE (1937) Some posterior probabilities in stock market action. Econometrica 5(3):280–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dicle MF, Beyhan A, Yao LJ (2010) Market efficiency and international diversification: evidence from India. Int Rev Econ Finance 19(2):313–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dogan TT, Aksoy E (2014) Is equity market efficient? Evidence from a small open economy. Int Bus Res 7(10):88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Das S, Hlavka M (1993) Efficiency with costly information: a reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios. Rev Financ Stud 6(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25:383–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fama E (1991) Efficient capital markets II. J Finance 46:1575–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama EF, Fisher L, Jensen MC, Roll R (1969) The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Int Econ Rev 10(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goetzmannn W, Ibbotson R (1994) Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance. J Portf Manag 9–18Google Scholar
  18. Hamburger MJ, Platt EN (1975) The expectations hypothesis and the efficiency of the treasury bill market. Rev Econ Stat 57:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holthausen R, Leftwich R, Mayers D (1987) The effect of large block transactions on security prices: a cross-sectional analysis. J Financ Econ 19:237–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ikoku AE (2010) Is the stock market a leading indicator of economic activity in Nigeria? CBN J Appl Stat 1(1):17–38Google Scholar
  21. Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J Finance 48(1):65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joyeux R, Milunovich G (2010) Testing market efficiency in the EU carbon futures market. Appl Financ Econ 20(10):803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraus A, Stoll HR (1972) Price impacts of block trading on the New York stock exchange. J Finance 27(3):569–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakonishok J, Vermaelen T (1990) Anomalous price behavior around repurchase tender offers. J Finance 45(2):455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahajan S, Luthra M (2013) Efficient market hypothesis in China stock markets. Clear Int J Res Commer Manag 4(9):47–50Google Scholar
  26. Malkiel BG (1995) Returns from investing in equity mutual funds from 1971 to 1991. J Finance 50(2):549–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mehrara M (2006) The relationship between stock market and macroeconomic variables: a case study for Iran. Iran Econ Rev 11(17):138–148Google Scholar
  28. Oxelheim L, Rafferty M (2005) On the static efficiency of secondary bond markets. J Multinatl Financ Manag 15(2):117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pesando JE (1978) On the efficiency of the bond market: some Canadian evidence. J Polit Econ 86(6):1057–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roll R (1970) The behavior of interest rates: an application of the efficient market model to US treasury bills, vol 1. Basic Books (AZ), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Roy R, Santhakumar S (2014) Time-varying global financial market inefficiency: an instance of pre-, during, and post-subprime crisis. The Decision 41(4):449–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sargent TJ (1968) Interest rates in the nineteen-fifties. Rev Economics and Stat 50:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stock JH, Watson MW (1988) Testing for common trends. J Am Stat Assoc 83(404):1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toda HY, Yamamoto H (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 66:225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zunino L, Bariviera AF, Guercio MB, Martinez LB, Rosso OA (2012) On the efficiency of sovereign bond markets. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 391(18):4342–4349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Institute of Management Calcutta 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommercePondicherry UniversityPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations