Advertisement

Journal of Nephrology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 571–576 | Cite as

Anatomical variations of the left anonymous trunk are associated with central venous catheter dysfunction

  • Antonio Granata
  • Luca Zanoli
  • Matteo Trezzi
  • Francesco Londrino
  • Antonio Basile
  • Fulvio Fiorini
  • Biagio Ricciardi
  • Pierpaolo Di Nicolò
  • On behalf of the Integrated Imaging and Nephrologic Interventions Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology.
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Internal jugular vein cannulation has become increasingly widespread. Compared to the left internal jugular vein (LIJV), the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred choice for the placement of central venous catheter (CVC) for hemodialysis, mostly due to the major technical difficulties and higher rate of complications of the LIJV approach. We aimed to investigate whether variability in the direction of the LIJV/brachiocephalic vein (BV) axis on the frontal plane could be a decisive factor in determining CVC dysfunctions.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study. From our Register, a total of 1489 consecutive patients (age 69 ± 9 years, males 60%) in whom a CVC for hemodialysis was placed from January 2012 to June 2014 were selected.

Results

LIJV cannulation, compared with RIJV, was associated with a higher rate of catheter dysfunction during an observational period of 2 weeks after catheter placement (16 vs.12%; p = 0.005). This complication was strongly correlated with the amplitude of the angle between the LIJV and the ipsilateral BV axis on the frontal plane; an angle ≤ 110° was associated with a higher rate of catheter dysfunction (78 vs.16%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The anatomical clarification presented in our study provides useful data that could explain the dysfunction rate of CVC inserted in the LIJV. Clinicians who insert high-flow catheters (such as hemodialysis catheters) should be aware of LIJV/BV axis variability and of the possible risks of CVC dysfunction when the angle between the LIJV and ipsilateral BV is ≤ 110°.

Keywords

Central venous catheterization Brachiocephalic veins Hemodialysis Complications Anatomical variations Vascular access 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

All of the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose no relationships with industry and no financial associations and declare the absence of conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR (2002) Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access-a systematic review. Crit Care Med 30(2):454–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGee DC, Gould MK (2003) Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348(12):1123–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lomonte C, Forneris G, Gallieni M et al (2016) The vascular access in the elderly: a position statement of the Vascular Access Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol 29(2):175–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trerotola SO (2000) Hemodialysis catheter placement and management. Radiology 215:651–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vascular Access 2006 Work Group (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S176–S247.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.029 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Townley SA (2003) Central venous catheter malposition in an anomalous pulmonary vein. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20(12):985–986CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Granata A, Figuera M, Basile A (2008) Right internal thoracic cannulation by CVC for hemodialysis therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 51(5):A42–A44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray H (1918) Anatomy of the human body. Lea & Febiger, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muralidhar K (1995) Left internal versus right internal jugular vein access to central venous circulation using the Seldinger technique. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 9:115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R et al (2003) Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta analysis. BMJ 327:361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Twardowski ZJ, Seger RM (2002) Measuring central venous structures in humans: implications for central-vein catheter dimensions. J Vasc Access 3(1):21–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Botha R, van Schoor AN, Boon JM, Becker JH, Meiring JH (2006) Anatomical considerations of the anterior approach for central venous catheter placement. Clin Anat 19:101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Itkin M, Kraus MJ, Trerotola SO (2004) Extrinsic compression of the left innominate vein in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(1 Pt 1):51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hammer F, Becker D, Goffette P, Mathurin P (2000) Crushed stents in benign left brachiocephalic vein stenoses. J Vasc Surg 32(2):392–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salgado OJ, Urdaneta B, Colmenares B, García R, Flores C (2004) Right versus left internal jugular vein catheterization for hemodialysis: complications and impact on ipsilateral access creation. Artif Organs 28(8):728–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dawood MM, Trebbin WM (1991) Complications associated with central venous cannulation. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 26(6):211–214 (218–219) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W (2012) The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 40:2479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Nephrology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Granata
    • 1
  • Luca Zanoli
    • 2
  • Matteo Trezzi
    • 3
  • Francesco Londrino
    • 3
  • Antonio Basile
    • 4
  • Fulvio Fiorini
    • 5
  • Biagio Ricciardi
    • 6
  • Pierpaolo Di Nicolò
    • 7
  • On behalf of the Integrated Imaging and Nephrologic Interventions Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology.
  1. 1.Nephrology and Dialysis Unit“St. Giovanni di Dio” HospitalAgrigentoItaly
  2. 2.Nephrology Section, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Nephrology and Dialysis Unit“St. Andrea” HospitalLa SpeziaItaly
  4. 4.Radiology Unit“Garibaldi” HospitalCataniaItaly
  5. 5.Nephrology and Dialysis Unit“St. Maria della Misericordia” HospitalRovigoItaly
  6. 6.Nephrology and Dialysis Unit“Fogliani” HospitalMilazzoItaly
  7. 7.Nephrology and Dialysis Unit“St. Maria della Scaletta” HospitalImolaItaly

Personalised recommendations