Advertisement

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

, Volume 42, Issue 11, pp 1299–1305 | Cite as

Measurement of urinary free cortisol by LC–MS–MS: adoption of a literature reference range and comparison with our current immunometric method

  • L. Bianchi
  • B. Campi
  • M. R. Sessa
  • G. De Marco
  • E. Ferrarini
  • R. Zucchi
  • C. Marcocci
  • P. Vitti
  • L. Manetti
  • A. Saba
  • P. AgrettiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

One of the best indicators of adrenal gland dysfunction is the level of free cortisol measured in the 24-h urine (UFC) which faithfully reflects the level of biologically active serum cortisol not subjected to circadian variations. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS) is a sensitive, accurate and precise method recently available in routine laboratories that could remedy interference problems of immunoassays.

Methods

In this study, a literature reference range for UFC measured by LC–MS–MS was verified, and UFC values measured by LC–MS–MS and immunoassay were compared. Immunometric UFC measurement was performed by ACCESS CORTISOL assay without preliminary extraction, using Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 600 highly automated platform. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry UFC measurement was performed by a home-made validated method using cortisol-D4 as internal standard with preliminary deproteinization of urinary samples by centrifugal filter and injection on reverse-phase column. Cortisol was analyzed in positive ion mode with an ESI interface.

Results

The reference interval from literature (11–70 μg/day) was confirmed by results obtained for healthy study group. Comparison study of the two methods highlighted a constant and proportional systematic error with a general tendency to overestimate results for the in-use method.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the direct immunometric method overestimates UFC results with respect to liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry which represents the reference method. The literature reference range 11–70 μg/day was confirmed and can be adopted by our lab that will shift all UFC tests performed in routine to the mass spectrometry-based method, satisfying clinicians’ request.

Keywords

Urinary free cortisol LC–MS–MS Immunometric assay Interference from steroid similar molecules Antibody cross-reactivity Reference range 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lindholm J (2000) Cushing’s syndrome: historical aspects. Pituitary 3:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Remer T, Maser-Gluth C, Wudy SA (2008) Glucocorticoid measurements in health and disease-metabolic implications and the potential of 24-h urine analyses. Mini Rev Med Chem 8:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schöneshöfer M, Fenner A, Dulce HJ (1980) Interferences in the radioimmunological determination of urinary free cortisol. Clin Chim Acta 101:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wood L, Ducroq DH, Fraser HL, Gillingwater S, Evans C, Pickett AJ, Rees DW, John R, Turkes A (2008) Measurement of urinary free cortisol by tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with results obtained by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and two commercial immunoassays. Ann Clin Biochem 45:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Persichilli S, Gervasoni J, Iavarone F, Zuppi C (2010) A simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for urinary free cortisol analysis: suitable for routine purpose. Clin Chem Lab Med 48:1433–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siekmann L (1979) Determination of steroid hormones by the use of isotope dilution-mass spectrometry: a definitive method in clinical chemistry. J Steroid Biochem 11:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siekmann L, Breuer H (1982) Determination of cortisol in human plasma by isotope dilution-mass spectrometry. Definitive methods in clinical chemistry. I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20:883–892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raffaelli A, Saba A, Vignali E, Marcocci C, Salvadori P (2006) Direct determination of the ratio of tetrahydrocortisol + allo-tetrahydrocortisol to tetrahydrocortisone in urine by LC–MS–MS. J Chromatogr B 830:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saba A, Raffaelli A, Cupisti A, Petri A, Marcocci C, Salvadori P (2009) Recent advances in the assessment of the ratios of cortisol to cortisone and of some of their metabolites in urine by LC–MS–MS. J Mass Spectrom 44:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saba A, Frascarelli S, Campi B (2018) The role of tandem mass spectrometry in clinical chemistry: quantification of steroid hormones and vitamin D. Compr Anal Chem 79:297–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Medicines Agency (2015) Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/08/WC500109686.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2011
  12. 12.
    Passing H, Bablok W (1983) A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:709–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Passing H, Bablok W (1984) Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part II. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22:431–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henny J, Vassault A, Boursier G, Vukasovic I, Mesko Brguljan P, Lohmander M, Ghita I, Andreu FA, Kroupis C, Sprongl L, Thelen MH, Vanstapel FJ, Vodnik T, Huisman W, Vaubourdolle M, Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) of the EFLM (2016) Recommendation for the review of biological reference intervals in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 54:1893–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Tabarin A, Endocrine Society (2015) Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:2807–2831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boscaro M, Arnaldi G (2009) Approach to the patient with possible Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3121–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mészáros K, Karvaly G, Márta Z, Magda B, Tőke J, Szücs N, Tóth M, Rácz K, Patócs A (2018) Diagnostic performance of a newly developed salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement using an LC–MS/MS method with simple and rapid sample preparation. J Endocrinol Investig 41:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ceccato F, Antonelli G, Frigo AC, Regazzo D, Plebani M, Boscaro M, Scaroni C (2017) First-line screening tests for Cushing’s syndrome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: the role of urinary free cortisol measured by LC–MS/MS. J Endocrinol Investig 40:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ceccato F, Marcelli G, Martino M, Concettoni C, Brugia M, Trementino L, Michetti G, Arnaldi G (2018) The diagnostic accuracy of increased late night salivary cortisol for Cushing’s syndrome: a real-life prospective study. J Endocrinol Investig 42:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horie H, Kidowaki T, Koyama Y, Endo T, Homma K, Kambegawa A, Aoki N (2007) Specificity assessment of immunoassay kits for determination of urinary free cortisol concentrations. Clin Chim Acta 378:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vogeser M, Seger C (2012) LC–MS/MS in clinical chemistry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 883–884:1–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCann SJ, Gillingwater S, Keevil BG (2005) Measurement of urinary free cortisol using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: comparison with the urine adapted ACS:180 serum cortisol chemiluminescent immunoassay and development of a new reference range. Ann Clin Biochem 42:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kushnir MM, Rockwood AL, Nelson GJ, Terry AH, Meikle AW (2003) Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urinary free cortisol. Clin Chem 49:965–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy BE, Okouneff LM, Klein GP, Ngo SC (1981) Lack of specificity of cortisol determinations in human urine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee C (1996) 6 beta-hydroxycortisol interferes with immunoassay of urinary free cortisol. Clin Chem 42:1290–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee C, Goeger DE (1998) Interference of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol in the quantitation of urinary free cortisol by immunoassay and its elimination by solid phase extraction. Clin Biochem 31:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Radó JP (1973) Falsely high fluorescence in cortisol determinations due to the carbamazepine. Horm Metab Res 5:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turpeinen U, Markkanen H, Välimäki M, Stenman UH (1997) Determination of urinary free cortisol by HPLC. Clin Chem 43:1386–1391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor RL, Machacek D, Singh RJ (2002) Validation of a high-throughput liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for urinary cortisol and cortisone. Clin Chem 48:1511–1519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Antonelli G, Artusi C, Marinova M, Brugnolo L, Zaninotto M, Scaroni C, Gatti R, Mantero F, Plebani M (2014) Cortisol and cortisone ratio in urine: LC–MS/MS method validation and preliminary clinical application. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Antonelli G, Marinova M, Artusi C, Plebani M (2017) Mass spectrometry or immunoassay: est modus in rebus. Clin Chem Lab Med 55:1243–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoofnagle AN, Wener MH (2009) The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry. J Immunol Methods 347:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carvalho VM (2012) The coming of age of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in the endocrinology laboratory. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 883–884:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Travers S, Martinerie L, Bouvattier C, Boileau P, Lombès M, Pussard E (2017) Multiplexed steroid profiling of gluco- and mineralocorticoids pathways using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 165:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van den Ouweland JM, Kema IP (2012) The role of liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 883–884:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Plebani M (2013) Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:741–751PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bianchi
    • 1
  • B. Campi
    • 2
  • M. R. Sessa
    • 1
  • G. De Marco
    • 3
  • E. Ferrarini
    • 3
  • R. Zucchi
    • 4
  • C. Marcocci
    • 3
    • 5
  • P. Vitti
    • 3
    • 5
  • L. Manetti
    • 5
  • A. Saba
    • 4
    • 6
  • P. Agretti
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Chemistry and EndocrinologyUniversity Hospital of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical PhysiologyNational Research CouncilPisaItaly
  3. 3.Section of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  5. 5.Endocrinology UnitsUniversity Hospital of PisaPisaItaly
  6. 6.Laboratory of Clinical PathologyUniversity Hospital of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations