Parathyroid scintigraphy in primary hyperparathyroidism: comparison between double-phase and subtraction techniques and possible affecting factors
Parathyroid scintigraphy is superior to other imaging techniques in detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands. It is mainly performed using double-phase or dual-tracer subtraction methods. Neither of the techniques is perfect and different protocols are being used. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of double-phase and subtraction methods in detecting abnormal gland as well as the potential effects of coexisting thyroid disease and clinical-laboratory data.
We considered patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroid surgery, after a parathyroid scintigraphy between April 2015 and February 2017. Sixty-eight patients were included; in 45 cases (66.2%), a thyroid disease was coexistent. Diagnostic performances of the two techniques were compared. The effect of thyroid disease and clinical-pathological data on examination interpretation was considered.
Double-phase scintigraphy showed higher sensitivity and accuracy in detecting the exact abnormal gland compared to the digital subtraction (90% and 75% vs. 76% and 66%, respectively). For double-phase technique, sensitivity and accuracy were higher in cases with no thyroid disease when compared to those with thyroid disease (92% and 86% vs. 88% and 69%, respectively). Similarly, for digital subtraction, sensitivity and accuracy were higher in the absence of thyroid disease compared to their presence (84% and 79% vs. 70% and 58%, respectively). There was no significant variation in the performance of both techniques, considering clinical-laboratory data.
Double-phase scintigraphy has been more accurate than digital subtraction. The presence of thyroid disease could be a possible limit, affecting the subtraction more than the double-phase technique. Clinical data did not influence the scintigraphic outcome.
KeywordsHyperparathyroidism Scintigraphy Double phase Subtraction Thyroid disease Gland size
The authors are grateful to Dr. Paolo Campanella (Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome) who collaborated on earlier drafts and prematurely left us in 2017.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 8.Kluijfhout WP, Vorselaars WM, van den Berk SA, Vriens MR, Borel Rinkes IH, Valk GD, van Dalen T, de Klerk JM, de Keizer B (2016) Fluorine-18 fluorocholine PET-CT localizes hyperparathyroidism in patients with inconclusive conventional imaging: a multicenter study from the Netherlands. Nucl Med Commun 37:1246–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bossert I, Chytiris S, Hodolic M, Croce L, Mansi L, Chiovato L, Mariani G, Trifirò G (2018) PETC/CT with 18F-Choline localizes hyperfunctioning parathyroid adenomas equally well in normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism as in overt hyperparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0931-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kobylecka MI, Bajera A, Fronczewska-Wieniawska K, Mączewska J, Płazińska MT, Królicki L (2016) Computer program for analysis of parathyroid scintigraphy examinations: combination of dual-tracer (subtraction) and double phase single-tracer washout techniques. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 19:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wilhelm SM, Wang TS, Ruan DT, Lee JA, Asa SL, Duh QY, Doherty GM, Herrera MF, Pasieka JL, Perrier ND, Silverberg SJ, Solórzano CC, Sturgeon C, Tublin ME, Udelsman R, Carty SE (2016) The American association of endocrine surgeons guidelines for definitive management of primary hyperparathyroidism. JAMA Surg 151:959–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Peeler BB, Martin WH, Sandler MP, Goldstein RE (1997) Sestamibi parathyroid scanning and preoperative localization studies for patients with recurrent/persistent hyperparathyroidism or significant comorbid conditions: development of an optimal localization strategy. Am Surg 63:37–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Krakauer M, Wieslander B, Myschetzky PS, Lundstrøm A, Bacher T, Sørensen CH, Trolle W, Nygaard B, Bennedbæk FN (2016) A prospective comparative study of parathyroid dual-phase scintigraphy, dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy, 4D-CT, and ultrasonography in primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Nucl Med 41:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Gotthardt M, Lohmann B, Behr TM, Bauhofer A, Franzius C, Schipper ML, Wagner M, Höffken H, Sitter H, Rothmund M, Joseph K, Nies C (2004) Clinical value of parathyroid scintigraphy with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: discrepancies in clinical data and a systematic metaanalysis of the literature. World J Surg 28:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar