Follow-up of patients with adrenal incidentaloma, in accordance with the European society of endocrinology guidelines: Could we be safe?
- 670 Downloads
Recently, the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) published new guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas. At the same time Lopez and coworkers published on the Annals of Internal Medicine an important study showing that even patients with non-functioning adrenal tumors have an increased risk of incident diabetes. In consideration of previous data and of the results of the study of Lopez and coworkers, some points emerge from the ESE Guidelines that deserve attention. Firstly, it must be observed that the term “autonomous cortisol secretion,” introduced by the ESE Panel in the place of the commonly used “subclinical hypercortisolism,” seems questionable, since the guidelines do not suggest determining the adrenocorticotroph hormone levels that could give the certain proof of a truly autonomous cortisol secretion. Secondly, the ESE Guidelines suggest against repeated hormonal workup in AI patients with a normal hormonal secretion at initial evaluation, but also in those with a “possible autonomous cortisol secretion,” if in the absence of comorbidities potentially related to hypercortisolism. Thirdly, the ESE Guidelines suggest against further imaging during follow-up in patients with an adrenal mass below 4 cm in size with clear benign features on imaging studies. Considering the available literature data that are briefly summarized in this comment, we believe that no sufficient evidence is available to date for giving sharp-cutting recommendations about the uselessness of a biochemical and morphological follow-up in AI patients, even in those with initially benign and not hypersecreting adrenal adenomas. However, if a recommendation has to be given on the basis of the present evidences, we should suggest to biochemically and morphologically follow-up AI patients for at least 5 years.
KeywordsSubclinical hypercortisolism Adrenal incidentalomas ESE Guidelines
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study informed consent is not required.
- 1.Chiodini I, Albani A, Ambrogio AG, Campo M, De Martino MC, Marcelli G et al (2016) Six controversial issues on subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrine epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1017-3
- 6.Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, Dralle H, Newell-Price J, Sahdev A et al (2016) Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 175:G1–G34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lopez D, Luque-Fernandez MA, Steele A, Adler GK, Turchin A, Vaidya A (2016) “Nonfunctional” adrenal tumors and the risk for incident diabetes and cardiovascular outcomes: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med epub ahead of print. doi: 10.7326/M16-0547
- 13.Di Dalmazi G et al (2014) Cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with adrenal incidentalomas that are either non-secreting or associated with intermediate phenotype or subclinical Cushing’s syndrome: a 15-year retrospective study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2:396–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar