Advertisement

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 865–874 | Cite as

Impaired immune phenotype of circulating endothelial-derived microparticles in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus

  • A. E. Berezin
  • A. A. Kremzer
  • T. A. Samura
  • T. A. Berezina
  • P. Kruzliak
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains a leading contributor to cardiovascular mortality worldwide. This study was conducted to investigate the pattern of circulating EMPs in T2DM patients in comparison with MetS subjects.

Methods

The study retrospectively included 101 patients (54 subjects with T2DM and 47 patients with MetS) and 35 healthy volunteers. All the patients gave written informed consent for participation in the study. Biomarkers were measured at baseline of the study.

Results

There is a significant difference between healthy subjects and patients regarding CD31+/annexin V+ EMPs to CD62E+ EMPs ratio, which reflects impaired phenotype of EMPs. Therefore, CD31+/annexin V+ EMPs to CD62E+ EMPs ratio was found to be higher in the T2DM patients compared to MetS patients. Using multivariate linear regression analyses, independent impact of T2DM (r = 0.40, P = 0.003), OPG (r = 0.37, P = 0.001), hs-CRP (r = 0.347, P = 0.001), and adiponectin (r = 0.33, P = 0.001) on increased CD31+/annexin V+ to CD62E+ ratio of EMPs was determined. Using C-statistics, we found that inflammatory biomarkers (hs-C-reactive protein, osteoprotegerin and adiponectin) added to the base model (T2DM) improved the relative IDI by 12.6 % for increased CD31+/annexin V+ EMPs to CD62E+ EMPs ratio.

Conclusion

We found that patients with T2DM and MetS may be distinguished by predominantly appearing phenotypes of circulating EMPs associated with pro-inflammatory cytokine overproduction. Elevated CD31+/annexin V+ EMPs to CD62E+ EMPs ratio is an indicator of impaired immune phenotype of EMPs, which allows determining the pattern of EMPs in dysmetabolic disorder patients.

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus Metabolic syndrome Circulating endothelial-derived microparticles Cardiovascular risk factors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients for their participation in the investigation, staff of the Regional Zaporozhye Hospital (Ukraine), and the doctors, nurses, and administrative staff of the Regional Center of Cardiovascular Diseases (Zaporozhye, Ukraine) and City Hospital #6 (Zaporozhye, Ukraine), general practices, and site-managed organizations that assisted with the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of State Medical University, Zaporozhye, Ukraine and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Nichols GA, Schroeder EB, Karter AJ, Gregg EW, Desai J, Lawrence JM, O’Connor PJ, Xu S, Newton KM, Raebel MA, Pathak RD, Waitzfelder B, Segal J, Lafata JE, Butler MG, Kirchner HL, Thomas A, Steiner JF, SUPREME-DM Study Group (2015) Trends in diabetes incidence among 7 million insured adults, 2006–2011: the SUPREME-DM project. Am J Epidemiol 181(1):32–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szczerbińska K, Topinková E, Brzyski P, van der Roest HG, Richter T, Finne-Soveri H, Denkinger MD, Gindin J, Onder G, Bernabei R (2014) The characteristics of diabetic residents in European nursing homes: results from the SHELTER study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.11.009 (epub ahead of print)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eliasson B, Gudbjörnsdottir S (2014) Diabetes care—improvement through measurement. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 106(2):S291–S294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eschwege E, Basdevant A, Crine A, Moisan C, Charles M (2014) Type 2 diabetes mellitus in France in 2012: results from the ObEpi survey. Diabetes Metab. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.007 (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pickup JC (2004) Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:813–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huber CA, Diem P, Schwenkglenks M, Rapold R, Reich O (2014) Estimating the prevalence of comorbid conditions and their effect on health care costs in patients with diabetes mellitus in Switzerland. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 7:455–465PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McMurray SD (2014) The fight against diabetes: how the kidney care community is taking action. Nephrol News Issues 28(10):30–32Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno PR, Fuster V (2004) New aspects in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherothrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(12):2293–2300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong ND, Patao C, Malik S, Iloeje U (2014) Preventable coronary heart disease events from control of cardiovascular risk factors in US adults with diabetes (projections from utilizing the UKPDS risk engine). Am J Cardiol 113(8):1356–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Sloten TT, Henry RM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Unger T, Schram MT, Stehouwer CD (2014) Endothelial dysfunction plays a key role in increasing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Hypertension 64(6):1299–1305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jia G, Sowers JR (2014) Endothelial dysfunction potentially interacts with impaired glucose metabolism to increase cardiovascular risk. Hypertension 64(6):1192–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zaghloul A, Al-Bukhari TA, Al-Pakistani HA, Shalaby M, Halawani SH, Bajuaifer N, Teama SH (2014) Soluble endothelial protein C receptor and high sensitivity C reactive protein levels as markers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: their role in the prediction of vascular complications. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 106(3):597–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Markiewicz M, Richard E, Marks N, Ludwicka-Bradley A (2013) Impact of endothelial microparticles on coagulation, inflammation, and angiogenesis in age-related vascular diseases. J Aging Res 2013:734509PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barteneva NS, Fasler-Kan E, Bernimoulin M, Stern JN, Ponomarev ED, Duckett L, Vorobjev IA (2013) Circulating microparticles: square the circle. BMC Cell Biol 14:23PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guay C, Regazzi R (2015) Role of islet microRNAs in diabetes: which model for which question? Diabetologia 58(3):456–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu ZH, Ji CL, Li H, Qiu GX, Gao CJ, Weng XS (2013) Membrane microparticles and diseases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17(18):2420–2427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tetta C, Bruno S, Fonsato V, Deregibus MC, Camussi G (2011) The role of microvesicles in tissue repair. Organogenesis 7(2):105–115PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martinez MC, Andriantsitohaina R (2011) Microparticles in angiogenesis: therapeutic potential. Circ Res 109:110–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rautou PE, Vion AC, Amabile N, Chironi G, Simon A, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM (2011) Microparticles, vascular function, and atherothrombosis. Circ Res 109(5):593–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurtzman N, Zhang L, French B, Jonas R, Bantly A, Rogers WT, Moore JS, Rickels MR, Mohler ER 3rd (2013) Personalized cytomic assessment of vascular health: evaluation of the vascular health profile in diabetes mellitus. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 84(4):255–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    (2013) Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care 36(1):S4–S10Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) (2002) Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation 106(25):3143–3421Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, Hundley WG, Manning WJ, Printz BF, Stuber M, Woodard PK (2008) Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 118:586–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, for the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150(9):604–612PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tam CS, Xie W, Johnson WD, Cefalu WT, Redman LM, Ravussin E (2012) Defining insulin resistance from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. Diabetes Care 35(7):1605–1610PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berezin AE, Kremzer AA (2014) Relationship between circulating endothelial progenitor cells and insulin resistance in none-diabetic patients with ischemic chronic heart failure. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 8:138–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18(6):499–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Orozco AF, Lewis DE (2010) Flow cytometric analysis of circulating microparticles in plasma. Cytometry A 77(6):502–514PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lacroix R, Judicone C, Mooberry M, Boucekine M, Key NS, Dignat-George F (2013) The ISTH SSC workshop. standardization of pre-analytical variables in plasma microparticle determination: results of the international society on thrombosis and haemostasis SSC collaborative workshop. J Thromb Haemost. doi: 10.1111/jth.12207 (epub ahead of print)PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leroyer AS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM (2008) Microparticles and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 34(1):S27–S32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Amabile N, Cheng S, Renard JM, Larson MG, Ghorbani A, McCabe E, Griffin G, Guerin C, Ho JE, Shaw SY, Cohen KS, Vasan RS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM, Wang TJ (2014) Association of circulating endothelial microparticles with cardiometabolic risk factors in the Framingham heart study. Eur Heart J 35(42):2972–2979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nomura S (2009) Dynamic role of microparticles in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diabetes Rev 5(4):245–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Puddu P, Puddu GM, Cravero E, Muscari S, Muscari A (2010) The involvement of circulating microparticles in inflammation, coagulation and cardiovascular diseases. Can J Cardiol 26(4):140–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jimenez JJ, Jy W, Mauro LM, Soderland C, Horstman LL, Ahn YS (2003) Endothelial cells release phenotypically and quantitatively distinct microparticles in activation and apoptosis. Thromb Res 109(4):175–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arteaga RB, Chirinos JA, Soriano AO, Jy W, Horstman L, Jimenez JJ, Mendez A, Ferreira A, de Marchena E, Ahn YS (2006) Endothelial microparticles and platelet and leukocyte activation in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiology 98(1):70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eaton S (2006) Release and trafficking of lipid-linked morphogens. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16:17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chironi GN, Boulanger CM, Simon A, Dignat-George F, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A (2009) Endothelial microparticles in diseases. Cell Tissue Res 335(1):143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shantsila E (2009) Endothelial microparticles: a universal marker of vascular health? J Hum Hypertens 23:359–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Camussi G, Deregibus MC, Bruno S, Grange C, Fonsato V, Tetta C (2011) Exosome/microvesiclemediated epigenetic reprogramming of cells. Am J Cancer Res 1:98–110PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E (2009) Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 9:581–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Poulsen MK, Nybo M, Dahl J, Hosbond S, Poulsen TS, Johansen A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Beck-Nielsen H, Rasmussen LM, Henriksen JE (2011) Plasma osteoprotegerin is related to carotid and peripheral arterial disease, but not to myocardial ischemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 10:76–84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Müller G, Schneider M, Biemer-Daub G, Wied S (2011) Microvesicles released from rat adipocytes and harboring glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins transfer RNA stimulating lipid synthesis. Cell Signal 23(7):1207–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang Y, Chen LM, Liu ML (2014) Microvesicles and diabetic complications—novel mediators, potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Acta Pharmacol Sin 35(4):433–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jansen F, Yang X, Hoelscher M, Cattelan A, Schmitz T, Proebsting S, Wenzel D, Vosen S, Franklin BS, Fleischmann BK, Nickenig G, Werner N (2013) Endothelial microparticle-mediated transfer of MicroRNA-126 promotes vascular endothelial cell repair via SPRED1 and is abrogated in glucose-damaged endothelial microparticles. Circulation 128(18):2026–2038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sinning JM, Losch J, Walenta K, Böhm M, Nickenig G, Werner N (2011) Circulating CD31+/Annexin V+ microparticles correlate with cardiovascular outcomes. Eur Heart J 32(16):2034–2041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mause SF, Weber C (2010) Microparticles: protagonists of a novel communication network for intercellular information exchange. Circ Res 107(9):1047–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Montoro-García S, Shantsila E, Marín F, Blann A, Lip GY (2011) Circulating microparticles: new insights into the biochemical basis of microparticle release and activity. Basic Res Cardiol 106(6):911–923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Berezin AE (2014) Circulating endothelial-derived apoptotic microparticles as novel perspective biomarker for diabetes. Diabetes Res Treat Open Access 1(4):117–120. doi: 10.14437/DRTOA-1-117 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Martovitskaya YV, Samura TA, Berezina TA (2015) The predictive role of circulating microparticles in patients with chronic heart failure. BBA Clin 3:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Martovitskaya YV, Samura TA, Berezina TA (2014) The biomarker risk prediction score in chronic heart failure. J Dis Mark 1(1):8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Berezin
    • 1
  • A. A. Kremzer
    • 2
  • T. A. Samura
    • 2
  • T. A. Berezina
    • 3
  • P. Kruzliak
    • 4
  1. 1.Internal Medicine DepartmentState Medical UniversityZaporozhyeUkraine
  2. 2.Clinical Pharmacology DepartmentState Medical UniversityZaporozhyeUkraine
  3. 3.Private Center “Vita-Center”ZaporozhyeUkraine
  4. 4.Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, International Clinical Research CenterSt. Anneʼs University Hospital and Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations