Advertisement

Matrix Training for Expanding the Communication of Toddlers and Preschoolers With Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Corina Jimenez-GomezEmail author
  • Sandhya Rajagopal
  • Regina Nastri
  • Ivy M. Chong
Research Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) typically exhibit a range of social communication deficits. Presequenced stimulus arrangements, such as matrix training, can be used to facilitate generative responding. Accordingly, training procedures can lead to the acquisition of a greater number of targets that are not taught explicitly, with fewer learning trials. Matrix training provides a useful framework for selecting teaching targets to promote the emergence of untaught skills. Participants were 3 young boys diagnosed with ASD, who were taught noun-verb combinations of play actions as tact and listener responses. All participants learned the taught noun-verb targets and showed varying degrees of recombinative generalization to untaught targets. Across subsequent matrices, the rate of acquisition of new targets and the number acquired without direct teaching increased (i.e., recombinative generalization). This suggests matrix training stimulus arrangements can facilitate the acquisition of novel targets by teaching young children with ASD to recombine language components appropriately.

Keywords

Tacting Listener responding Verbal behavior Matrix training Recombinative generalization Language Autism 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Alessi, G. (1987). Generative strategies and teaching for generalization. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axe, J. B., & Sainato, D. M. (2010). Matrix training of preliteracy skills with preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 635–652.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes-Holmes, D., Finn, M., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2018). Derived stimulus relations and their role in a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. Perspectives on Behavioral Science, 41, 155–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0124-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conallen, K., & Reed, P. (2016). A teaching procedure to help children with autistic spectrum disorder to label emotions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curiel, E. S., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2016). Matrix training of receptive language skills with a toddler with autism spectrum disorder: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 95–109.Google Scholar
  8. Curiel, E. S. L., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2018). Matrix training for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder and other language delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 40, 268–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118788060.
  9. Dauphin, M., Kinney, E. M., & Stromer, R. (2004). Using video-enhanced activity schedules and matrix training to teach sociodramatic play to a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 238–250.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060040501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esler, A. N., Hus Bal, V., Guthrie, W., Wetherby, A., Weismer, S. E., & Lord, C. (2015). The autism diagnostic observation schedule, toddler module: Standardized severity scores. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2704–2720.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2432-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frampton, S. E., Wymer, S. C., Hansen, B., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2016). The use of matrix training to promote generative language with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 869–883.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, H. (1983). Recombinative generalization: Relationships between environmental conditions and the linguistic repertoires of language learners. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 279–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-4684(83)90002-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein, H., Angelo, D., & Mousetis, L. (1987). Acquisition and extension of syntactic repertoires by severely mentally retarded youth. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 549–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(87)90054-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein, H., & Mousetis, L. (1989). Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: Effects of peers’ expressive modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 245–259.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1989.22-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung, S., & Sainato, D. M. (2013). Teaching play skills to young children with autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38, 74–90.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.732220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kinney, E. M., Vedora, J., & Stromer, R. (2003). Computer-presented video models to teach generative spelling to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007030050010301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  22. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37–50). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  24. Mackay, H. A., & Fields, L. (2009). Syntax, grammatical transformation, and productivity: A synthesis of stimulus sequences, equivalence classes, and contextual control. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 125–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  29. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP (2nd ed.). Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, E. R., Wine, B., & Fitterer, K. (2017). An investigation of the matrix training approach to teach social play skills. Behavioral Interventions, 32, 278–284.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Scott Center for Autism Treatment and Florida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA
  2. 2.May InstituteRandolphUSA

Personalised recommendations