Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Modeling Training of Child’s Echoic Conversational Response for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: To Be a Good Listener

  • Natsumi Ishikawa
  • Mikimasa OmoriEmail author
  • Jun-ichi Yamamoto
Research Article

Abstract

Students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have difficulties in responding to conversation with verbal language. These students often repeat what they hear, and their echoic behavior has a potentially communicative function. We define the echoic behavior when an individual repeats a peer’s topic word with appropriate prosody within 3 s as the child’s echoic conversational response. In this study, we examined the acquisition of the child’s echoic conversational response skills and whether these skills could provide and generalize natural conversation for 4 students with ASD. During the training, students were instructed to imitate the topic word that the experimenter had used in the latest conversation. Students learned the child’s echoic conversational response skills and improved their conversation skills. They even showed a slight generalization for nontraining materials through trainings and improvements in responding with new verbal responses. These findings suggested that expanding speakers’ repertoires for students with ASD might facilitate improvement of natural conversation skills.

Keywords

Students with autism spectrum disorder Child’s echoic conversational response Conversation skills Echoic Intraverbal 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship (Grant No. 26-3116) and the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 26285213).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All three authors report no conflicts of interest.

Human Subjects

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Keio University Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Letters and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study and their parents.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2010). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Bondy, A., Tincani, M., & Frost, L. (2004). Multiply controlled verbal operants: An analysis and extension to the picture exchange communication system. Behavior Analyst, 27, 247–261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393184.
  4. Capps, L., Kehres, J., & Sigman, M. (1998). Conversational abilities among children with autism and children with developmental delays. Autism, 2, 325–344.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361398024002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casenhiser, D. M., Binns, A., McGill, F., Morderer, O., & Shanker, S. G. (2015). Measuring and supporting language function for children with autism: Evidence from a randomized control trial of a social-interaction-based therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 846–857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2242-3.
  6. Charlop, M. H., & Milstein, J. P. (1989). Teaching autistic children conversational speech using video modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 275–285.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1989.22-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlop-Christy, M. H., Le, L., & Freeman, K. A. (2000). A comparison of video modeling with in vivo modeling for teaching children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 537–552.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005635326276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provisions for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256.
  9. Eikeseth, S., & Smith, D. P. (2013). An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: Implications for practice and applied research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 125–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393130.
  10. Gena, A., Couloura, S., & Kymissis, E. (2005). Modifying the affective behavior of preschoolers with autism using in-vivo or video modeling and reinforcement contingencies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 545–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0014-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
  12. Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Hood, S. A., Luczynski, K. C., & Mitteer, D. R. (2017). Toward meaningful outcomes in teaching conversation and greeting skills with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 459–486.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: Teaching children with autism to mand for questions to answers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-1.
  15. Ishizuka, Y., & Yamamoto, J. (2016). Contingent imitation increases verbal interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 20, 1011–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315622856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, C. D., & Schwartz, I. S. (2009). When asking questions is not enough: an observational study of social communication differences in high functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 432–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0642-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1994). Joint attention, developmental level, and symptom presentation in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mundy, P., & Stella, J. (2000). Joint attention, orienting, and nonverbal communication in autism. In A. M. Wetherby & B. M. Prizant (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders: A transactional developmental perspective (pp. 55–77). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  20. Nadig, A., Lee, I., Singh, L., Bosshart, K., & Ozonoff, S. (2010). How does the topic of conversation affect verbal exchange and eye gaze? A comparison between typical development and high-functioning autism. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2730–2739.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters, L. C., & Thompson, R. H. (2015). Teaching children with autism to respond to conversation partners’ interest. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 544–562.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1986). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS): For diagnostic screening and classification of autism. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sterponi, L., & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as interactional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41, 275–304.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000682.
  25. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tager-Flusberg, H., Calkins, S., Nolin, T., Baumberger, T., Anderson, M., & Chadwick-Dias, A. (1990). A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and down syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02206853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Ueno, K., Nagoshi, N., & Konuki, S. (2008). PVT-R Kaiga goi hattatsu kensa [Picture vocabulary test-revised manual]. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha.Google Scholar
  29. Vedora, J., Meunier, L., & Mackay, H. (2009). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism: A comparison of textual and echoic prompts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 79–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393072.
  30. Wechsler, D. (1998). Wechsler intelligence scales for students (3rd ed.). trans: Azuma, H., Ueno, K., Fujita, K., Maekawa, H., Ishikuma, T., Sato, H.. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. (Original work published 1991).Google Scholar
  31. Wechsler, D. (2010). Wechsler intelligence scales for children (4th ed.). trans: Ueno, K., Fujita, K., Maekawa, H., Ishikuma, T., Dairoku, K., Matsuda, O.. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation. (Original work published 2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natsumi Ishikawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mikimasa Omori
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Jun-ichi Yamamoto
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Human RelationsKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Child PsychiatryThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-kuTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human and Social SciencesShowa Women’s UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Chiyoda-kuTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Psychology, Faculty of LettersKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations