Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 44–51 | Cite as

Use of a Level System with Flexible Shaping to Improve Synchronous Engagement

  • Joseph H. CihonEmail author
  • Julia L. Ferguson
  • Justin B. Leaf
  • Ronald Leaf
  • John McEachin
  • Mitchell Taubman
Research Article

Abstract

Level systems have been described as a framework which can be used to shape behavior through the systematic application of behavioral principles. Within level systems, an individual moves up and down through various levels contingent upon specific behaviors. Although level systems are commonly used within schools and other settings, they have a limited empirical literature base, and there is debate over the efficacy and overall acceptance of level systems. More especially, there is scant empirical literature on the use level systems to improve socially significant behaviors (e.g., synchronous engagement) with individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a level system with a structured, yet flexible approach to movement on improving synchronous engagement with two dyads of children diagnosed with ASD. The results of an ABAB reversal design indicated that the level system was effective at improving synchronous engagement for both dyads. The results are discussed in relation to potential future research difficulties and clinical implications.

Keywords

Level system Flexible Shaping Feedback Autism Engagement 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, A. M., Shea, T. M., & Keppler, R. (1986). Levels systems: a framework for the individualization of behavior management. Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Contingency contracting, token economy, and group contingencies. In Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.pp. 550–574). Upper Saddle: Pearson.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, D. T., Smith, S. W., & Brownell, M. T. (1998). Teacher perceptions of level system effectiveness on the behavior of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalez, M. L., Taylor, T., Borrero, C. S. W., & Sangkavasi, E. (2013). An individualized levels system to increase independent mealtime behavior in children with food refusal. Behavioral Interventions, 28(2), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagopian, L. P., Rush, K. S., Richman, D. M., Kurtz, P. F., Contrucci, S. A., & Crosland, K. (2002). The development and application of individualized levels systems for the treatment of severe problem behavior. Behavior Therapy, 33(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kazdin, A. E., & Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The token economy: an evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(3), 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Leaf, J. A., Alcalay, A., Ravid, D., Dale, S., … & Oppenheim-Leaf, M. (2016a). Comparing paired-stimulus preference assessments with in-the-moment reinforcer analysis on skill acquisition: a preliminary investigation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Taubman, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Ross, R. K., … & Weiss, M. J. (2016b). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 720–731.Google Scholar
  11. Leaf, J. B., Leaf, J. A., Milne, C., Taubman, M., Oppenheim-Leaf, M., Torres, N., … & Yoder, P. (2017). An evaluation of a behaviorally based social skills group for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 243–259.Google Scholar
  12. Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Taubman, M., McEachin, J., & Delmolino, L. (2014). Comparison of flexible prompt fading to error correction for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohr, W. K., Martin, A., Olson, J. N., Pumariega, A. J., & Branca, N. (2009). Beyond point and level systems: moving toward child-centered programming. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(1), 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Powell, J., Martindale, A., & Kulp, S. (1975). An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(4), 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, S. W., & Farrell, D. T. (1993). Level system use in special education: classroom intervention with prima facie appeal. Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vernon, T. W., Koegel, R. L., Dauterman, H., & Stolen, K. (2012). An early engagement intervention for young children with autism and their parents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(12), 2702–2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weinkauf, S., Zeug, N., Anderson, C., & Ala’i-Rosales, S. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive staff training package for behavioral interventions for children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 864–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Autism Partnership FoundationSeal BeachUSA
  2. 2.Endicott CollegeBeverlyUSA

Personalised recommendations