Comparison of Traditional and Embedded DTT on Problem Behavior and Responding to Instructional Targets
Embedded discrete trial training (DTT) involves the presentation of instructional targets in an activity-based situation, and serves as an alternative to traditional, table-top instruction (Geiger, Carr, LeBlanc, Hanney, Polick, et al. Behavior Analysis in Practice 5, 49–59, 2012). The current study compared the effects of Traditional and Embedded DTT on responding to instructional targets and problem behavior for one child with autism. Although the results showed similar levels of accuracy for instructional targets across both conditions, there were more target exposures and no problem behavior during Embedded DTT. The results are discussed along with future directions for research and clinical practice.
KeywordsAntecedent interventions Embedded discrete trial training Problem behavior Skill acquisition Traditional discrete trial training
Data were collected while the authors were affiliated with Trumpet Behavioral Health. We thank Amy Williams, Jessica O’Donnell, and Naomi Melendez for their assistance with this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Shaji Haq and Jenna Aranki declare they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from the guardian of the participant in this study.
- Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., Hanney, N. M., Polick, A. S., & Heinicke, M. R. (2012). Teaching receptive discriminations to children with autism: A comparison of traditional and embedded discrete trial teaching. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lerman, D. C., Valentino, A. L., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2016). Discrete trial training. In R. Lang, T. B. Hancock, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 47–83). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). Questions about behavioral function. Baton Rouge, LA: Disability Consultants.Google Scholar
- Mirenda-Linne, F., & Melin, L. (1992). Acquisition, generalization, and spontaneous use of color adjectives: A comparison of incidental teaching and traditional discrete-trial procedures for children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(92)90025-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Ma, C. H., Edrisinha, C., Cannella, H., & Lancioni, G. U. (2006). Effects of embedded instruction versus discrete-trial training on self-injury, correct responding, and mood in a child with autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250600999160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education & Treatment for Children, 8, 67–76.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement Program Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar