Advertisement

Functional Communication Training for Multiple Reinforcers: an Evaluation of Isolated Control Following a Synthesized Context

  • Megan A. BoyleEmail author
  • Shannie M. Stamper
  • Elizabeth A. Donaldson
  • Kaitlin S. Curtis
  • Kara L. Forck
  • Melissa A. Shrimplin
  • Allie C. Barsness
  • Christina Oller
Research Article

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of teaching 2 functionally and topographically dissimilar communication responses within the same sessions following a functional analysis with a synthesized contingency. We also conducted stimulus-control probes to determine the extent to which communication responses and problem behavior occurred when each contingency was presented in isolation. The child in the current study acquired communicative responses for both reinforcers, and problem behavior decreased during functional communication training (FCT). Further, relevant communication responses occurred in the respective stimulus-control probes. Results are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice regarding methods for conducting FCT following functional analyses with synthesized contingencies.

Keywords

Functional analysis Functional communication training Synthesized contingency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jordy and his family for participating in the study.

Funding

This study did not receive funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falcomata, T. S., Wacker, D. P., Ringdahl, J. E., Vinquist, K., & Dutt, A. (2013). An evaluation of generalization of mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 444–454.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual (2nd ed.). New Castle: Pyramid Educational Consultants.Google Scholar
  7. Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., Jessel, J., & Landa, R. (2018). Shaping complex functional communication responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 502–520.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., Jin, S. C., & Vanselow, N. R. (2016). Affirming control by multiple reinforcers via progressive treatment analysis. Behavioral Interventions, 31, 70–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagopian, L. P., Bruzek, J. L., Bowman, L. G., & Jennett, H. K. (2007). Assessment and treatment of problem behavior occasioned by interruption of free-operant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 89–103.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.63-05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagopian, L. P., Rooker, G. W., Jessel, J., & DeLeon, I. G. (2013). Initial functional analysis outcomes and modifications in pursuit of differentiation: A summary of 176 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 88–100.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanley, G. P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 54–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 16–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howlin, P., Moss, P., Savage, S., & Rutter, M. (2013). Social outcomes in mid- to later adulthood among individuals diagnosed with autism and average nonverbal IQ as children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 572–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2008). Clinical application of functional analysis methodology. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 3–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn, D. E., Hardesty, S. L., & Sweeney, N. M. (2009). Assessment and treatment of excessive straightening and destructive behavior in an adolescent diagnosed with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 355–360.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang, R., Davis, T., O’Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Sigafoos, J., ... Regester, A. (2010). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement across two school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 113–116.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-113.
  19. Lindauer, S. E., Zarcone, J. R., Richman, D. M., & Schroeder, S. R. (2002). A comparison of multiple reinforcer assessments to identify the function of maladaptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 299–303.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rooker, G. W., DeLeon, I. G., Borrero, C. S. W., Frank-Crawford, M. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (2014). Reducing ambiguity in the functional assessment of problem behavior. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rooker, G. W., Iwata, B. A., Harper, J. M., Fahmie, T. A., & Camp, E. M. (2011). False-positive tangible outcomes of functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 737–745.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roscoe, E. M., Schlichenmeyer, K. J., & Dube, W. V. (2015). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A systematic approach for identifying idiosyncratic variables. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 289–314.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santiago, J. L., Hanley, G. P., Moore, K., & Jin, C. S. (2016). The generality of interview-informed functional analyses: Systematic replications in school and home. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2617-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slaton, J. D., Hanley, G. P., & Raftery, K. J. (2017). Interview-informed functional analyses: A comparison of synthesized and isolated components. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 252–277.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strohmeier, C. W., Murphy, A., & O’Connor, J. T. (2017). Parent-informed test-control functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior related to combined established operations. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 20, 247–252.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1133723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, J. L., & Seltzer, M. M. (2011). Employment and post-secondary educational activities for young adults with autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 566–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1070-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitaker, P. (2004). Fostering communication and shared play between mainstream peers and children with autism: Approaches, outcomes, and experiences. British Journal of Special Education, 31, 212–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan A. Boyle
    • 1
    Email author return OK on get
  • Shannie M. Stamper
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Donaldson
    • 1
  • Kaitlin S. Curtis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kara L. Forck
    • 1
    • 3
  • Melissa A. Shrimplin
    • 1
  • Allie C. Barsness
    • 1
  • Christina Oller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Leadership, and Special EducationMissouri State UniversitySpringfieldUSA
  2. 2.Applied Behavioral Services in CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Morning Star Behavioral Associates in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations