Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 70–78 | Cite as

Maintaining Professional Relationships in an Interdisciplinary Setting: Strategies for Navigating Nonbehavioral Treatment Recommendations for Individuals with Autism

  • Matthew T. BrodheadEmail author
Discussion and Review Paper


Due to an increase in research and clinical application of behavior analysis with individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), one setting a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) may work within is an interdisciplinary setting, where multiple disciplines collaborate to improve the outcomes of individuals with ASD. In some cases, nonbehavioral colleagues could recommend nonbehavioral treatments, setting the occasion for the BCBA to offer an alternative treatment to or question the nonbehavioral treatment. However, excessive questioning or critiques of nonbehavioral treatments by the BCBA may unintentionally erode professional relationships between the BCBA and their nonbehavioral colleagues. Because an erosion of professional relationships may occur when a BCBA questions a nonbehavioral treatment, a decision-making model for determining whether or not the proposed nonbehavioral treatment is worth addressing may be useful. The purpose of this paper is to outline such a decision-making model in order to assist the BCBA in assessing nonbehavioral treatments while maintaining an ethical balance between professional relationships and the well-being and safety of the individual with ASD. Such a model could assist the BCBA in becoming familiar with the proposed treatment, understanding the perspective of the nonbehavioral colleague and assessing the negative impacts the treatment could have on the individual with ASD. With this information, the BCBA will be in a better position to decide whether or not addressing the nonbehavioral treatment is worth the possibility of eroding a professional relationship.


Ethics Autism Applied behavior analysis Interdisciplinary 


  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba. 1968.1-91.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB). (2010). Behavior Analyst Certification Board guidelines for responsible conduct for behavior analysts. Accessed July 2014.
  3. Brodhead, M. T., & Higbee, T. S. (2012). Teaching and maintaining ethical behavior in a professional organization. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 82–88.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chok, J. T., Reed, D. D., Kennedy, A., & Bird, F. L. (2010). A single-case experimental analysis of the effects of ambient prism lenses for an adolescent with developmental disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 42–51.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (2010). The state of the art of collaboration on behalf of students with disabilities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/10474410903535398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. New Jersey: Person Education.Google Scholar
  7. Cox, D. J. (2012). From interdisciplinary to integrated care of the child with autism: the essential role for a code of ethics. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 42, 2729–2738. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1530-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dallmer, D. (2004). Collaborative relationships in teacher education: A personal narrative of conflicting roles. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 29–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2004.00279.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2010). Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior: A treatment-selection model for practicing behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 22–32.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69, 315–332. doi: 10.1177/001440290306900304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kane, K. (2006). Death of 5-year-old boy linked to controversial chelation therapy. Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Accessed July 14, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, A., & Tincani, M. (2013). Collaborative training and practice among applied behavior analysts who support individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 120–131.Google Scholar
  13. Løvaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313. doi: 10.1023/A:1010795219886.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Normand, M. P. (2008). Science, skepticism, and applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 42–49.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Haire, M. E., McKenzie, S. J., Beck, A. M., & Slaughter, V. (2013). Social behaviors increase in children with autism in the presence of animals compared to toys. PLoS ONE, 8, e57010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057010.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Leary, P. N., Miller, M. M., Olive, M. L., & Kelly, A. N. (2015). Blurred lines: Ethical implications of social media for behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi: 10.1007/s40617-014-0033-0.Google Scholar
  18. Quigley, S. P., Peterson, L., Frieder, J. E., & Peterson, S. (2011). Effects of a weighted best on problem behaviors during functional analyses in children with pervasive developmental disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schlosser, R. W., Balandin, S., Hemsley, B., Iacono, T., Probst, P., & von Tetzchner, S. (2014). Facilitated communication and authorship: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 359–368. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.971490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Slocum, T. A., & Butterfield, E. C. (1994). Bridging the schism between behavioral and cognitive analyses. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 59–73.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson, T. (2014). Autism and behavior analysis. In F. K. McSweeney & E. S. Murphy (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of operant and classical conditioning. Oxford: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118468135.ch19.Google Scholar
  22. Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 16–23.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Studies, College of EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations