Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 52–61 | Cite as

Best Practices in Utilizing the Changing Criterion Design

  • Liesa A. Klein
  • Daniel HoulihanEmail author
  • James L. Vincent
  • Carlos J. Panahon
Discussion and Review Paper
  • 924 Downloads

Abstract

The changing criterion design (CCD) has been a recognized format of single-case research for four decades. Published examples of the CCD have been limited and the structure of the design used in the literature has varied to a degree that might engender confusion. This review examines the structure of CCD studies published to date to identify prior implementation practices and identify best practices for future use.

Keywords

Single-case Changing criterion design Best practices 

References

  1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. E., Copeland, R. E., & Hall, R. V. (1974). School phobia: effects of behavior modification treatment applied by an elementary school principal. Child Study Journal, 4, 125–133.Google Scholar
  4. Burley, S., Gutkin, T. B., & Wendy, N. (1994). Assessing the efficacy of an academic hearing peer tutor for a profoundly deaf student. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 415–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Delprato, D. J. (2002). Countercontrol in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 191–200.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. De Luca, R. V., & Holborn, S. W. (1990). Effects of fixed-interval and fixed-ratio schedules of token reinforcement on exercise with obese and non-obese boys. Psychological Record, 40, 67–82.Google Scholar
  8. De Luca, R. V., & Holborn, S. W. (1992). Effects of a variable-ratio reinforcement schedule with changing criteria on exercise in obese and nonobese boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 671–679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Polite, K. (1990). School-based, behavioral self-management: a review and analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., Cook, D. M., & Quinn, G. (1988). An evaluation of the effectiveness of teacher- vs. student-management classroom interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flood, W. A., & Wilder, D. A. (2004). The use of differential reinforcement and fading to increase time away from a caregiver in a child with separation anxiety disorder. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 1–8.Google Scholar
  12. Grey, I., Healy, O., Leader, G., & Hayes, D. (2009). Using a Time Timer to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 359–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, R. V. (1971). Managing behavior: behavior modification, the measurement of behavior. Lawrence: H&H Enterprises.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, R. V., & Fox, R. G. (1977). Changing-criterion designs: an alternate applied behavior analysis procedure. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: theory, method, and application. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, F. N., & Jenson, W. R. (1985). Comparisons of multiple-baseline across persons designs and AB designs with replication: issues and confusions. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 121–127.Google Scholar
  16. Hartmann, D. P., & Hall, R. V. (1976). The changing criterion design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 527–532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: a variation on the multiple baseline design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDougall, D. (2005). The range-bound changing criterion design. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDougall, D. (2006). The distributed criterion design. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roane, H. S., Rihgdahl, J. E., Kelley, M. E., & Glover, A. C. (2011). Single-case experimental designs. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 132–147). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schleien, S. J., Wehman, P., & Kiernan, J. (1981). Teaching leisure skill to severely handicapped adults: an age-appropriate darts game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 513–519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. Wallace, C. J., & Davis, J. R. (1974). Effects of information and reinforcement on the conversational behavior of chronic psychiatric patient dyads. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 656–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Weis, L., & Hall, R. V. (1971). Modification of cigarette smoking through avoidance of punishment. In R. V. Hall (Ed.), Managing behavior: behavior modification applications in school and home (pp. 54–55). Lawrence: H & H Enterprises.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liesa A. Klein
    • 1
  • Daniel Houlihan
    • 1
    Email author
  • James L. Vincent
    • 1
  • Carlos J. Panahon
    • 1
  1. 1.Minnesota State University, MankatoMonkatoUSA

Personalised recommendations