Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 138–140 | Cite as

Ask the Experts: How Can New Students Defend Behavior Analysis from Misunderstandings?

  • Amel Becirevic
Discussion and Review Paper


The success of behavior analysis as a field depends on the successes of its students, researchers, practitioners, and advocates. A new generation of graduate students will ultimately speak on the behalf of the field. In order to further promote the field, students must not only learn about what behavior analysis is, but also about what behavior analysis is not. We must prepare ourselves to adequately defend behavior analysis from those who disseminate misperceptions and misunderstandings. As such, an electronic survey designed to glean some information on how behavior analysts would respond to various inaccuracies or misunderstandings of behavior analysis was distributed through behavior-analytic listservs and social media websites. Findings show that the majority of respondents indicate that any graduate student ought to correct the misunderstandings about the field. What do seasoned behavior analysts have to say about the majority opinion about the responsibilities of graduate students and what recommendations do they have for new graduate students who come across misunderstandings about behavior analysis?


Misunderstanding Behavior analysis Misconception Dissemination 


  1. Baum, W. M. (2000). Alive and kicking: a review of Handbook of Behaviorism, edited by William O’Donoghue and Richard Kitchener. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 263–270. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-263.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Fredericks, D. W. (2006). The evolution of scientific psychology. In B. D. Midgley & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on J. R. Kantor and interbehavioral psychology (pp. 39–62). Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
  3. Huxley, A. (1958). Brave new world revisited. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Kestner, J., & Flora, S. R. (1995). Representation of behavioral methodology in experimental psychology textbooks. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 385–390.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lattal, K. A., & Rutherford, A. (2013). John B. Watson’s behaviorist manifesto at 100. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 39, 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. Poling, A. (2010). Looking to the future: will behavior analysis survive and prosper? The Behavior Analyst, 33, 7–17.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schlinger, H. D. (2010). Perspectives on the future of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 1–5. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.32.12.1006.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Skinner, B. F. (1977). Herrnstein and the evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32, 1006–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504. doi: 10.1126/science.7244649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of steady misinterpretation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. doi: 10.1037/h0074428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavioral ScienceUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations