Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 172–195 | Cite as

The Effects of the Interspersal of Related Responses on the Emergence of Intraverbals for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • M. Alice Shillingsburg
  • Sarah E. FramptonEmail author
Article

Abstract

The present study evaluated the emergence of intraverbals for 2 children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Prior to baseline, both children demonstrated tact, tact function, listener, and listener by function responses with 12 pictorial stimuli, yet they failed to demonstrate intraverbals related to the function of the items (e.g., “What do you do with [item]?” and “What do you use to [function]?”). Following baseline, previously mastered related tact, tact function, listener, and listener by function tasks were presented prior to probe trials for the target item-function and function-item intraverbals. Results showed that interspersal of the related tasks for a subset of the intraverbals led to the emergence of untrained item-function and function-item intraverbals for both participants. In Experiment 2, the long-term effects of this remedial training on the emergence of untrained intraverbals was evaluated as new tact and listener responses were trained. Results of Experiment 2 showed that tact function and listener by function training was sufficient to establish the emergence of item-function and function-item intraverbals in the absence of related-task interspersal. These results are discussed in relation to current explanations for emergent responding.

Keywords

autism emergence intraverbal tact listener responding verbal behavior 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no declared financial conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained for all individuals in the study.

References

  1. Arntzen, E., & Hansen, S. (2011). Training structures and the formation of equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 483–503.Google Scholar
  2. Axe, J. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: A review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24(1), 159–174.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cihon, T. M. (2007). A review of training intraverbal repertoires: Can precision teaching help? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 123–133.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus-control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 657–666  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-657 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Delfs, C. H., Conine, D. E., Frampton, S. E., Shillingsburg, M. A., & Robinson, H. C. (2014). Evaluation of the efficiency of listener and tact instruction for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 793–809  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.166 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiorile, C. A., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The induction of naming in children with no prior tact responses as a function of multiple exemplar histories of instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 71–87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Frampton, S. E., Robinson, H. C., Conine, D. E., & Delfs, C. H. (2017). An abbreviated evaluation of listener and tact instruction for children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(2), 131–144  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0175-y PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270–285.Google Scholar
  9. Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 157–178.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Grannan, L., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). Emergent intraverbal responses via tact and match-to-sample instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(3), 601–605  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-601 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., Chavez-Brown, M., & Rivera-Valdez, C. (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 123–134.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Greer, R. G., Yuan, L., & Gautreaux, G. (2005). Novel dictation and intraverbal responses as a function of multiple exemplar history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 99–116.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Haggar, J., Ingvarsson, E. T., & Braun, E. C. (2018). Further evaluation of blocked trials to teach intraverbal responses under complex stimulus control: Effects of criterion-level probes. Learning and Motivation, 62, 29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2017.02.006 Google Scholar
  14. Hargrave, A. C., & Senechal, M. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(1), 75–90  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00038-1 Google Scholar
  15. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingvarsson, E. T., Kramer, R. L., Carp, C. L., Pétursdóttir, A. I., & Macias, H. (2016). Evaluation of a blocked-trials procedure to establish complex stimulus control over intraverbal responses in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 205–224  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0071-5 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Karsten, A. M., & Carr, J. E. (2009). The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 327–334  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-327 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Keintz, K. S., Miguel, C. F., Kao, B., & Finn, H. E. (2011). Using conditional discrimination training to produce emergent relations between coins and their values in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 909–913  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-909 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Kisamore, A. N., Karsten, A. M., & Mann, C. C. (2016). Teaching multiply controlled intraverbals to children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(4), 826–847  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.344 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kobari-Wright, V. V., & Miguel, C. F. (2014). The effects of listener training on the emergence of categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 431–436  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.115 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, G. P., Miguel, C. F., Darcey, E. K., & Jennings, A. M. (2015). A further evaluation of the effects of listener training on derived categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 19, 72–81.Google Scholar
  23. Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of non-compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(2), 123–141  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1988.21-123 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. May, R. J., Hawkins, E., & Dymond, S. (2013). Brief report: Effects of tact training on emergent intraverbal vocal responses in adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(4), 996–1004  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1632-7 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 125–138  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Miguel, C. F., & Kobari-Wright, V. V. (2013). The effects of tact training on the emergence of categorization and listener behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 669–673 https://doi.org/10.1002.jaba.62 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2008). The role of naming in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89(3), 383–405  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008-89-383 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrow, L. M., & Brittain, R. (2003). The nature of storybook reading in the elementary school: Current practices. In A. van Kleech, S. A. Stahl, & E. B. Bauer (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 140-158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 153–158  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-153 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39(1), 49–59  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Nuzzolo-Gomez, R., & Greer, R. D. (2004). Emergence of untaught mands or tacts of novel adjective-object pairs as a function of instructional history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 20, 63–76.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer, D. C. (2016). On intraverbal control and the definition of the intraverbal. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 96–106  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0061-7 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowan, V. C., & Pear, J. J. (1985). A comparison of the effects of interspersal and concurrent training sequences on acquisition, retention, and generalization of picture names. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 127–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shillingsburg, M. A., Frampton, S. E., Cleveland, S. A., & Cariveau, T. (2018). A clinical application of procedures to promote the emergence of untrained intraverbal relations with children with autism. Learning and Motivation, 62, 51–66  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2017.02.003 Google Scholar
  36. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, D. P., Eikeseth, S., Fletcher, S. E., Montebelli, L., Smith, H. R., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). Emergent intraverbal forms may occur as a result of listener training for children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(1), 27–37  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0057-3 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Stauch, T., LaLonde, K., Plavnick, J. B., Bak, M. Y. S., & Gatewood, K. (2017). Intraverbal training for individuals with autism: The status of multiple control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33, 98–116.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart, I. (2018). Derived relational responding and relational frame theory: A fruitful behavior analytic paradigm for the investigation of human language. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000129 Google Scholar
  40. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-409 Google Scholar
  41. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 23–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Vallinger-Brown, M., & Rosales, R. (2014). An investigation of stimulus pairing and listener training to establish emergent intraverbals in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30(2), 148–159  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0014-y PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12(3), 257–259  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(81)90055-0 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  45. Wynn, J. W., & Smith, T. (2003). Generalization between receptive and expressive language in young children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 245–266  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.142 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marcus Autism CenterAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Emory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations