Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 64–79 | Cite as

Teaching Problem Explanations Using Instructive Feedback

  • Christopher A. TullisEmail author
  • Sarah E. Frampton
  • Caitlin H. Delfs
  • M. Alice Shillingsburg
Article

Abstract

Instructive feedback (IF) is a procedure in which extra information is presented to a participant during the consequence portion of instruction for other skills. Previous research has demonstrated that participants with intellectual disabilities may acquire a portion of non-targeted skills (secondary targets) without explicit instruction when extra information is presented. Previous research has demonstrated that IF has resulted in more efficient instruction for participants with disabilities as a whole. However, few studies have focused on participants with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Additionally, the measures of secondary target acquisition in past research have focused solely on discrete responses (e.g., one-word utterances). The current investigation extended the IF literature related to participants with ASD by including longer verbal responses as secondary targets and assessing maintenance for both primary and secondary targets. Across three participants, IF resulted in the acquisition of at least a portion of secondary targets without explicit teaching. For two participants, additional instruction was required before IF resulted in acquisition of secondary targets. Across all three participants, gains observed for both primary and secondary targets in intervention were maintained.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder Discrete-trial-teaching Explanations Instructive feedback 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no declared financial conflicts of interest.

Ethics Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained for all individuals in the study.

References

  1. Carroll, R. A., & Kodak, T. (2015). Using instructive feedback to increase response variability during intraverbal training for children with autism spectrum disorder. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 183–199. doi: 10.1007/s40616-015-0039x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Kelso, S. E. (2003). Teaching children with autism conversational speech using a cue card/written script program. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 108–127.Google Scholar
  3. Cipani, E. (2012). Stimulus overselectivity: empirical basis and diagnostic methods. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13, 3–11. doi: 10.1037/h0100712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delmolino, L., Hansford, A. P., Bamond, M. J., Fiske, K. E., & LaRue, R. H. (2013). The use of instructive feedback for teaching language skills to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd/2013.02.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dotto-Fojut, K. M., Reeve, K. F., Townsend, D. B., & Progar, P. R. (2011). Teaching adolescents with autism to describe a problem and request assistance during simulated vocational trials. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 826–833. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd/2010.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esch, J. W., Esch, B. E., McCart, J. D., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2010). An assessment of self-echoic behavior in young children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 3–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Falkenstine, K. J., Collins, B. C., Schuster, J. W., & Kleinert, H. (2009). Presenting chained and discrete tasks as non-targeted information when teaching discrete academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127–142.Google Scholar
  8. Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  9. Gutierrez, R. D. (2006). The role of rehearsal in joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 183–190.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagman, J. D., & Rose, A. M. (1983). Retention of military tasks. Human Factors, 25, 199–213. doi: 10.1177/001872088302500207.Google Scholar
  11. Loughrey, T. O., Betz, A. M., Majdalany, L. M., & Nicholson, K. (2014). Using instructive feedback to teach category names to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 425–430. doi: 10.1002/jaba.123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nottingham, C. L., Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2015). Incorporating additional targets into learning trials for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 227–232. doi: 10.1002/jaba.179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Parsons, J. A. (1976). Conditioning precurrent (problem solving) behavior of children. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 190–206.Google Scholar
  15. Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2011). Comparison of progressive prompt delay with and without instructive feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 327–340. doi: 10.190/jaba.2011.44-327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Listening is behaving verbally. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 145–161.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sigafoos, J., Roberts, D., Kerr, M., Couzens, D., & Baglioni, A. J. (1994). Opportunities for communication in classrooms serving children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 259–279. doi: 10.1007/BF02172226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1984). An operant analysis of problem solving. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 583–613. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00027412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stone, W. L., & Caro-Martinez, L. M. (1990). Naturalistic observations of spontaneous communication in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 437–453. doi: 10.1007/BF02216051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP: verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: a language and social skills assessment program for children with autism or other developmental disabilities: guide. Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 805–816. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75. doi: 10.1007/BF02110214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whalen, C., Schuster, J. W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (1996). The use of unrelated instructive feedback when teaching in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 188–202.Google Scholar
  25. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., & Holcombe, A. (1993). Reflections on “effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors”. Exceptionality, 4, 117–123. doi: 10.1207/s15327035ex0402_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolery, T. D., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1016679928480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher A. Tullis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah E. Frampton
    • 2
  • Caitlin H. Delfs
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Alice Shillingsburg
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education, and Communication DisordersGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.The Marcus Autism CenterAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Emory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations