Race Plays a Role in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Women with Osteoporosis
Using a concurrent mixed methods design, we investigated how knowledge, attitudes, values, and beliefs among women with osteoporosis can explain racial disparities in bone health. We recruited African American and White women ≥ 65 years of age with osteoporosis to participate in focus groups. We quantitatively compared scores of the “Osteoporosis & You” knowledge scale and each domain (internal, powerful others, and chance) of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale by race using t tests. We qualitatively explored potential racial differences in attitudes, values, and beliefs in the domains: (1) osteoporosis and bone health concerns, (2) knowledge about osteoporosis, (3) utilization of medical services for osteoporosis, (4) facilitators of osteoporosis prevention activities, and (5) barriers to osteoporosis prevention activities. A total of 48 women (White: 36; African American: 12) enrolled in the study. White women had a mean (SD) of 7.8 (0.92), whereas African American women score a 6.6 (2.6) (p = 0.044) out of 10 on the Osteoporosis & You Scale. The powerful others domain was significantly higher among African American for both general and bone health [General Health — African American: 26.7 (5.9) vs. White: 22.3 (3.8); p = 0.01]. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed differences by race in knowledge, types of physical activity, coping with comorbidities, physician trust, religion, and patient activation. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, our study identified racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in women with osteoporosis that could result in racial disparities in bone health, indicating the need to improve education and awareness about osteoporosis in African American women.
KeywordsOsteoporosis Mixed-methods Disparities Epidemiology
We would like to thank the participants of this study. This study was supported by K12 HS023009 and a pilot project from the Deep South Resource Center for Minority Aging Research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
NCW: Research: Amgen; Expert Witness: Pfizer; Honorarium: Columbia University Medical Center
MEM: Research: Amgen
EBL: Research: Amgen; Advisory Boards: Amgen; Consultant: Novartis
KGS: research grant, consulting (Amgen, Mereo, Radius, Roche)
- 5.Population 65 years and over in the United States 2016 American community survey 1-year estimates. 2016 [cited 2018 September 7]; Available from: https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_15_1YR_S0103&prodType=table.
- 13.Lo JC, Srinivasan S, Chandra M, Patton M, Budayr A, Liu LH, et al. Trends in mortality following hip fracture in older women. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(3):e206–14.Google Scholar
- 16.Brenneman SK, B. E., Chen Y, Abbott TA, Validation of a patient questionnaire, “Osteoporosis and You”, designed to assess osteoporosis-related attitudes, knowledge and behavior. J Bone Miner Res, 2002. 17 (Suppl 1).Google Scholar
- 18.Loeb S, Penrod J, Hupcey J. Focus groups and older adults: tactics for success. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006;32(3):32–8.Google Scholar
- 21.Collins KS, Cathy S, Joseph S, et al. Health concerns across a woman's lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women's Health. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999.Google Scholar
- 25.Williams IC, et al. The role of perceived discrimination and other psychosocial factors in explaining diabetes distress among older African American and White adults. J Appl Gerontol, 2018; p. 733464817750273.Google Scholar