Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors’ Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making
We examined prostate cancer patients’ perceived engagement in treatment decision-making and associated factors by race/ethnicity in a multiethnic sample.
We identified patients through the California Cancer Registry. Patients completed a cross-sectional telephone interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by race/ethnicity, estimated the associations of patient demographic and health status characteristics on (1) doctor asked patient to help decide treatment plan and (2) patient and doctor worked out a treatment plan together.
We included 855 prostate cancer patients: African American (19%), Asian American (15%), Latino (24%), and White (42%). Asian American patients were less likely than White patients to report that their doctors asked them to help decide a treatment plan (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.18–0.53) and that they worked out a treatment plan with their doctors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.33–0.90). Language of interview was a significant contributing factor in stratified analysis for both outcomes.
Asian American prostate cancer patients reported less engagement in treatment decision-making, with Chinese language being a significant contributing factor. Future research should identify patient-centered strategies that effectively engage underserved patients and support healthcare providers in shared decision-making with multiethnic and multilingual patients.
KeywordsProstate cancer Treatment decision-making Disparities Men Engagement
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All study activities were approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 5.Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer A, Kuo T, Carpenter WR, Agans RP, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017;317:1141–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Epstein RM, Street RL. Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting health and reducing suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
- 17.Bieber C, Nicolai J, Gschwendtner K, Muller N, Reuter K, Buchholz A, et al. How does a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for oncologists affect participation style and preference matching in patients with breast and colon cancer? J Cancer Educ. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1146-7.
- 35.Lovell BL, Lee RT, Brotheridge CM. Physician communication: barriers to achieving shared understanding and shared decision making with patients. J Particip Med. 2010;2:e12.Google Scholar
- 41.Pew Research Center. The rise of Asian Americans. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2013.Google Scholar
- 48.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures for African Americans 2016-2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2016.Google Scholar
- 49.Amalraj S, Starkweather C, Nguyen C, Naeim A. Health literacy, communication, and treatment decision-making in older cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009;23:369–75.Google Scholar
- 52.Chan ECY, McFall SL, Byrd TL, Mullen PD, Volk RJ, Ureda J, et al. A community-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among Hispanic American men changed knowledge and role preferences: a cluster RCT. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:e44–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Murray-García JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CP. Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients’ values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000;38:300–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar