Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Hispanic Immigrant Women in Coastal South Carolina
This study aims to examine prevalence and correlates of cervical cancer screening utilization and adherence among a growing population of Hispanic immigrant women in coastal South Carolina.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 196 women to assess recency of screening and hypothesized study predictors (health status, beliefs, self-efficacy, having a regular provider, barriers to screening, and trust in providers). Multiple ordinal logistic regressions identified final covariates which would predict recency of screening.
Approximately 84% of women were up-to-date with their Pap tests and 47% had received a Pap test in the previous year. In the adjusted analyses, having a regular provider and having a chronic medical condition were significantly associated with recency of Pap test.
Differences in cervical cancer screening for participants were partially explained by psychosocial factors, health status, and individual and structural barriers to healthcare.
KeywordsCervical cancer screening Pap test Hispanics/Latinos Immigrants
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Supported in part by the State of South Carolina (GCR 16030400), the Biostatistics Shared Resource, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina (P30 CA 138313) and by the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Biomedical Informatics Center (BMIC) (UL1 TR 001450) which supports REDCap.
Conflicts of Interest
John Luque declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yelena Tarasenko declares that she has no conflict of interest. Hong Li declares that she has no conflict of interest. Caroline Davila declares that she has no conflict of interest. Rachel Knight declares that she has no conflict of interest. Rosa Alcantar declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Fact Finder. 2016. http://factfinder.census.gov/. Accessed February 16, 2016.
- 3.National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2015: With special feature on racial and ethnic health disparities. Hyattsville, MD 2016.Google Scholar
- 6.Luque JS, Tarasenko YN, Reyes-Garcia C, Alfonso ML, Suazo N, Rebing L, et al. Salud es Vida: a cervical cancer screening intervention for rural Latina immigrant women. J Cancer Educ. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0978-x.
- 8.Wells KJ, Luque JS, Miladinovic B, Vargas N, Asvat Y, Roetzheim RG, et al. Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(8):1580–98. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Doroshenk M, Fedewa S, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):30–54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Reagan-Steiner S, Yankey D, Jeyarajah J, Elam-Evans LD, Singleton JA, Curtis CR, et al. National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(29):784–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.National Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). 2016. http://hints.cancer.gov/. Accessed April 7, 2016.
- 20.Fernandez ME, Diamond PM, Rakowski W, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G, Williams J, et al. Development and validation of a cervical cancer screening self-efficacy scale for low-income Mexican American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(3):866–75. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Luque JS, Tarasenko YN, Maupin JN, Alfonso ML, Watson LC, Reyes-Garcia C, et al. Cultural beliefs and understandings of cervical cancer among Mexican immigrant women in Southeast Georgia. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(3):713–21. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0117-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Nuno T, Gerald JK, Harris R, Martinez ME, Estrada A, Garcia F. Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(8):1333–41. doi: 10.1007/s10552–012–0012-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Miranda-Diaz C, Betancourt E, Ruiz-Candelaria Y, Hunter-Mellado RF. Barriers for compliance to breast, colorectal, and cervical screening cancer tests among Hispanic patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;13(1). doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010021.
- 29.Pew Research Center. Hispanic immigrants more likely to lack health insurance than U.S.-born. 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/26/higher-share-of-hispanic-immigrants-than-u-s-born-lack-health-insurance/. Accessed May 17, 2017.
- 35.Platonova ER, Warren-Findlow J, Saunders WJ, Hutchison JA, Coffman MJ. Hispanics’ satisfaction with free clinic providers: an analysis of patient-centered medical home characteristics. J Community Health. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0218-2.
- 36.Reagan-Steiner S, Yankey D, Jeyarajah J, Elam-Evans LD, Curtis CR, MacNeil J, et al. National, Regional, State, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(33):850–8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6533a4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.National Heart B, and Lung Institute. Classification of overweight and obesity by BMI, waist circumference, and associated disease risks. 2016. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmi_dis.htm. Accessed July 6, 2016.