Latina and Black/African American Women’s Perspectives on Cancer Screening and Cancer Screening Reminders

  • Susan Brandzel
  • Eva Chang
  • Leah Tuzzio
  • Camille Campbell
  • Nora Coronado
  • Erin J. Aiello Bowles
  • Susan Carol Bradford
  • Diana S. M. Buist
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Racial and ethnic disparities continue to exist in cancer screening rates, especially among US Latina and Black/African American populations. We conducted six focus groups among 41 women from these communities in order to better understand their preferences about cancer screening reminders and the motivators and deterrents they face in obtaining recommended breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening.

Methods

Using self-reported patient race/ethnicity from electronic medical records of a large, integrated health care system in Seattle, we recruited women ages 30–60 to participate in one of five 2-hour focus groups. Using verbatim transcripts from these discussions, we conducted a qualitative analysis to identify common themes.

Results

The focus group participants were primarily strong endorsers and utilizers of recommended breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening services. Insurance and belief in preventive care were the most common motivators that they cited in obtaining cancer screening. However, they still reported multiple barriers to getting recommended cancer screening for themselves and community members, including lack of time, conflicting information about screening intervals, distrust in the health care system, and a lack of understanding of the benefits of preventive care.

Conclusions

Efforts to improve understanding about the benefits of cancer screening, clarify cancer screening guideline recommendations, increase cultural competency among health care professionals, and expand the times and locations where cancer screening is available are all options that may improve cancer screening rates among Latinas and Black/African American women.

Keywords

Cancer screening Reminders Latina Black/African American Disparities 

References

  1. 1.
    Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. SEER Stat Face Sheets: Female Breast Cancer. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD. 2015. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2016.
  2. 2.
    Smith RA. The value of modern mammography screening in the control of breast cancer: understanding the underpinnings of the current debates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2014;23(7):1139–46. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El Zoghbi M, Cummings LC. New era of colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8(5):252–8. doi:10.4253/wjge.v8.i5.252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Virnig BA, Baxter NN, Habermann EB, Feldman RD, Bradley CJ. A matter of race: early-versus late-stage cancer diagnosis. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(1):160–8. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holowatyj AN, Ruterbusch JJ, Rozek LS, Cote ML, Stoffel EM. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival among patients with young-onset colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(18):2148–56. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0994 JCO.2015.65.0994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figues 2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society 2016. Report No.: 500812.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Alcaraz KI, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; doi:10.3322/caac.21340.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eng TY, Chen T, Vincent J, Patel AJ, Clyburn V, Ha CS. Persistent disparities in Hispanics with cervical cancer in a major city. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016; doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0214-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancer-prevention-early-detection. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.
  10. 10.
    Smith SG, McGregor LM, Raine R, Wardle J, von Wagner C, Robb KA. Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers. Psychooncology. 2016; doi:10.1002/pon.4195.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basch CH, Basch CE, Zybert P, Wolf RL. Fear as a barrier to asymptomatic colonoscopy screening in an urban minority population with health insurance. J Community Health. 2016;41(4):818–24. doi:10.1007/s10900-016-0159-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Millon-Underwood S, Kelber ST. Exploratory study of breast cancer screening practices of urban women: a closer look at who is and is not getting screened. ABNF J. 2015;26(2):30–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moshkovich O, Lebrun-Harris L, Makaroff L, Chidambaran P, Chung M, Sripipatana A, et al. Challenges and opportunities to improve cervical cancer screening rates in US health centers through patient-centered medical home transformation. Adv Prev Med. 2015;2015:182073. doi:10.1155/2015/182073.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waghray A, Jain A, Waghray N. Colorectal cancer screening in African Americans: practice patterns in the United States. are we doing enough? Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016;4(2):136–40. doi:10.1093/gastro/gow005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Molina Y, Plascak JJ, Patrick DL, Bishop S, Coronado GD, Beresford SA. Neighborhood predictors of mammography barriers among US-based Latinas. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016; doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0222-3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miranda-Diaz C, Betancourt E, Ruiz-Candelaria Y, Hunter-Mellado RF. Barriers for compliance to breast, colorectal, and cervical screening cancer tests among Hispanic patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):ijerph13010021. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010021.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA. 2016. https://nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.
  18. 18.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2012–2014. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society 2012. Report No.: 862312.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker DW, Brown T, Goldman SN, Liss DT, Kollar S, Balsley K, et al. Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(11):1685–90. doi:10.1007/s10552-015-0650-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weaver KE, Ellis SD, Denizard-Thompson N, Kronner D, Miller DP. Crafting appealing text messages to encourage colorectal cancer screening test completion: a qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e100. doi:10.2196/mhealth.4651.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis JL, Ramos R, Rivera-Colon V, Escobar M, Palencia J, Grant CG, et al. The Yo me cuido(R) program: addressing breast cancer screening and prevention among Hispanic women. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(3):439–46. doi:10.1007/s13187-014-0710-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toth CSM. The only safe SMS texting is no SMS texting. J Med Pract Manage. 2015;31(3):187–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cole AMTS, Fernandez ME, Calo WA, Hotz J, Wolver S. Reported use of electronic health records to implement evidence based approaches to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. J Health Poor Underserved. 2015;26(4):1235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    MacLaughlin KL, Swanson KM, Naessens JM, Angstman KB, Chaudhry R. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(2):136–43. doi:10.1111/jep.12098.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rowe S, Goldsmith G, Price R, Brooks A, Harvey A. Health care providers’ perspectives of an intervention designed to improve colorectal cancer screening rates in family medicine residency clinics: a qualitative study. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27(4):695–702. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0393-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza JI. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1:CD002943. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002943.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagner TH. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:64–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3:CD002834. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002834.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stone E, Morton S, Hulscher M, Maglione M, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacobson VJ, Szilagyi P. Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003941. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub2.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R, Fletcher RH, Ayanian JZ. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):364–71. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.564.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCarthey D, Mueller K, Tillman I. Group Health Cooperative: reinventing primary care by connecting patients with a medical home. Washington, DC: The Commonwealth Fund2009 July 2009 Contract No.: 1283.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, Ross TR, Tufano JT, Soman MP, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(9):e71–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    American Academy of Family Physicians. Joint Principles of a Patient-Centered Medical Home Released by Organizations Representing More Than 300,000 Physicians American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS. 2007. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/media/releases/2007/20070305pressrelease0.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.
  35. 35.
    Bowles EJ, Gao H, Brandzel S, Bradford SC, Buist DS. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening. Prev Med. 2016;86:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith A. U.S Smartpone Use in 2015. In: Pew Research Center - Internet, Science & Tech. Pew Research Center, New York, NY. 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.
  37. 37.
    Drake BF, Tannan S, Anwuri VV, Jackson S, Sanford M, Tappenden J, et al. A community-based partnership to successfully implement and maintain a breast health navigation program. J Community Health. 2015;40(6):1216–23. doi:10.1007/s10900-015-0051-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scheel JR, Molina Y, Briant KJ, Ibarra G, Lehman CD, Thompson B. Latinas’ Mammography Intention Following a Home-based Promotores-led intervention. J Community Health. 2015;40(6):1185–92. doi:10.1007/s10900-015-0046-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Brandzel
    • 1
  • Eva Chang
    • 2
  • Leah Tuzzio
    • 1
  • Camille Campbell
    • 3
  • Nora Coronado
    • 4
  • Erin J. Aiello Bowles
    • 1
  • Susan Carol Bradford
    • 5
  • Diana S. M. Buist
    • 1
  1. 1.Group Health Research InstituteSeattleUSA
  2. 2.RTI InternationalWalthamUSA
  3. 3.Swedish Cancer InstituteSeattleUSA
  4. 4.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Group Health Cooperative, Department of Clinical Improvement and PreventionSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations