Advertisement

Breast Cancer Screening Among Women with Medicaid, 2006–2008: a Multilevel Analysis

  • Lee Rivers Mobley
  • Sujha Subramanian
  • Florence K. Tangka
  • Sonja Hoover
  • Jiantong Wang
  • Ingrid J. Hall
  • Simple D. Singh
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Nationally, about one third of women with breast cancer (BC) are diagnosed at late stage, which might be reduced with greater utilization of BC screening. The purpose of this paper is to examine the predictors of BC mammography use among women with Medicaid, and differences among Medicaid beneficiaries in their propensity to use mammography.

Methods

The sample included 2,450,527 women drawn from both fee-for-service and managed care Medicaid claims from 25 states, during 2006–2008. The authors used multilevel modeling of predictors at person, county, and state levels of influence and examined traditional factors affecting access and the expanded scope of practice allowed for the nurse practitioner (NP) in some states to provide primary care independent of physician oversight.

Results

Black [OR = 0.87; 95 % CI (0.87–0.88)] and American Indian women [OR = 0.74; 95 % CI (0.71–0.76)] had lower odds ratio of mammography use than white women, while Hispanic [OR = 1.06; 95 % CI (1.05–1.07)] had higher odds ratio of mammography use than white women. Living in counties with higher Hispanic residential segregation [OR = 1.16; 95 % CI (1.10–1.23)] was associated with a higher odds ratio of mammography use compared to areas with low Hispanic residential segregation, whereas living among more segregated black [OR = 0.78; 95 % CI (0.75–0.81)] or Asian [OR = 0.19; 95 % CI (0.17–0.21)] communities had lower odds ratio compared to areas with low segregation. Holding constant statistically the perceived shortage of MDs, which was associated with significantly lower mammography use, the NP regulatory variable [OR = 1.03; 95 % CI (1.01–1.07)] enhanced the odds ratio of mammography use among women in the six states with expanded scope of practice, compared with women residing in 19 more restrictive states.

Conclusions

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the use of mammography among Medicaid-insured women. More expansive NP practice privileges in states are associated with higher utilization, and may help reduce rural disparities.

Keywords

Breast cancer screening Medicaid Multilevel analysis Racial or ethnic disparities Racial or ethnic residential segregation Nurse practitioner regulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Funding support for Lee Mobley, Sujha Subramanian, Sonja Hoover, and Jiantong Wang was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Contract No. 200-2008-27958, Task order 35, to RTI International).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. The research does not involve human participants or animals and did not require informed consent. This manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. This manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full). This study has not been split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time. No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support our conclusions. No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own. Proper acknowledgements to other works have been given. Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities—tacitly or explicitly—at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out. Authors whose names appear on this manuscript have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

References

  1. 1.
    Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Shickle LM, Farrell N. Differences in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: experiences of insured and uninsured women in a safety-net setting. Inquiry. 2008;45(3):323–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuo TM, Mobley LR, Anselin L. Geographic disparities in late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in California. Health Place. 2011;17(1):327–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Radley DC, Schoen C. Geographic variation in access to care—the relationship with quality. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):3–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peipins LA, Graham S, Young R, Lewis B, Flanagan B. Racial disparities in travel time to radiotherapy facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Soc Sci Med. 2013;89:32–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niccolai LM, Julian PJ, Bilinski A, Mehta NR, Meek JI, Zelterman D, et al. Geographic poverty and racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer precursor rates in Connecticut, 2008–2009. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):156–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner SE, Hurley DM, Hebert JR, McNamara C, Bayakly AR, Vena JE. Cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in Georgia: describing racial cancer disparities and potential geographic determinants. Cancer. 2012;118(16):4032–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lian M, Schootman M, Doubeni CA, Park Y, Major JM, Stone RA, et al. Geographic variation in colorectal cancer survival and the role of small-area socioeconomic deprivation: a multilevel survival analysis of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(7):828–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman HP, Chu KC. Determinants of cancer disparities: barriers to cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2005;14(4):655–69 .vCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coughlin SS, Richardson LC, Orelien J, Thompson T, Richards TB, Sabatino SA, et al. Contextual analysis of breast cancer stage at diagnosis among women in the United States, 2004. Open Health Serv Policy J. 2009;2:45–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhanegaonkar A, Madhavan SS, Khanna R, Remick SC. Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid fee-for-service program: 1999–2008. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(8):821–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N, Tangka F, Shaw KM. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Med Care. 2008;46(7):692–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunt BR, Whitman S, Hurlbert MS. Increasing black:white disparities in breast cancer mortality in the 50 largest cities in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;38(2):118–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). Scope of Practice Legislative Database, 2011–2013. 2013. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/scope-of-practice-legislation-tracking-database.aspx. Accessed Feb 2015.
  14. 14.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Research Data Assistance Center. Medicaid data 2006–2008. 2013. Minneapolis, MN: Research Data Assistance Center. Available from: http://www.resdac.org/cms-data/search?f[0]=im_field_program_type%3A2
  15. 15.
    Byrd V, Dodd AH. Assessing the usability of encounter data for enrollees in comprehensive managed care across MAX 2007–2009, Medicaid Policy Brief, Brief 15. 2012 Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    U.S. Preventive Task Force. Screening for breast cancer. 2002. cited 2014 August 25. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca2002.htm
  17. 17.
    Research Triangle Institute (RTI). Spatial impact factor database. 2014. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International. Available from: https://rtispatialdata.rti.org
  18. 18.
    Massey DS, Denton NA. The dimensions of residential segregation. Sociol Forum. 1988;67:281–315.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(2):166–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    Stange K. How does provider supply and regulation influence health care markets? Evidence from nurse practitioners and physician assistants. J Health Econ. 2014;33:1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    Cassidy A. Health policy brief: nurse practitioners and primary care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    Yee T, Boukus E, Cross D, Samuel D. Primary care workforce shortages: nurse practitioner scope-of-practices laws and payment policies. National Institute for Health Care Reform, Research Brief No. 13. 2013. 2013 [cited 2014 June]. Available from: http://www.nihcr.org/PCP-Workforce-NPs
  23. 24.
    Kuo YF, Loresto Jr FL, Rounds LR, Goodwin JS. States with the least restrictive regulations experienced the largest increase in patients seen by nurse practitioners. Health Aff. 2013;32(7):1236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    Hansen-Turton T. Nurse practitioners as leaders in primary care: current challenges and future opportunities. National Conference of State Legislatures: Louisville, KY; 2010 .Available from: http://www.ncsl.org/documents/health/hansenturtonpp.pdf Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    Ewing J, Hinkley K. Meeting the primary care needs of rural America: examining the role of non-physician providers. The Rural Health Connection. 2013.Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). State profiles: reforming the health care system, 12th edition. 2003. [cited 2015 February 17]. Available from: http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/health/d17984_reform_2003.pdf
  27. 28.
    Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    Williams DR, Collins C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(5):404–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 30.
    Dai D. Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit. Health Place. 2010;16(5):1038–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 31.
    Schulz AJ, Williams DR, Israel BA, Lempert LB. Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milt Q. 2002;80(4):677–707 .ivGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography. 2004;41(3):385–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 33.
    Kramer MR, Hogue CR. Is segregation bad for your health? Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:178–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 34.
    Haas JS, Earle CC, Orav JE, Brawarsky P, Neville BA, Williams DR. Racial segregation and disparities in cancer stage for seniors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):699–705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 35.
    Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Andrews L. How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context?: a case study of mammography use in California. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(3):315–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 36.
    Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Driscoll D, Clayton L, Anselin L. Heterogeneity in mammography use across the nation: separating evidence of disparities from the disproportionate effects of geography. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 37.
    Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Clayton LJ, Evans WD. Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low? Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(6):1017–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 38.
    Bell JF, Zimmerman FJ, Almgren GR, Mayer JD, Huebner CE. Birth outcomes among urban African-American women: a multilevel analysis of the role of racial residential segregation. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(12):3030–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 39.
    LaVeist TA. The political empowerment and health-status of African-Americans—mapping a new territory. AJS. 1992;97(4):1080–95.Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    Mobley L, Kuo T. United States health policies and late-stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnosis: why such disparities by age? Heal Econ Rev. 2015;5:20. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0058-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Rivers Mobley
    • 1
  • Sujha Subramanian
    • 2
  • Florence K. Tangka
    • 3
  • Sonja Hoover
    • 2
  • Jiantong Wang
    • 2
  • Ingrid J. Hall
    • 3
  • Simple D. Singh
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Public Health and Andrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.RTI InternationalWalthamUSA
  3. 3.Division of Cancer Prevention and ControlCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations