Advertisement

Effects of Negative Punishment on Culturants in a Situation of Concurrence between Operant Contingencies and Metacontingencies

  • Thais Maria Monteiro GuimarãesEmail author
  • Carlos Rafael Fernandes Picanço
  • Emmanuel Zagury TourinhoEmail author
Cultural and Behavioral Systems Science

Abstract

Effects of negative punishment are analyzed either with an emphasis on undesirable behavioral byproducts or by reference to its possible role in an increase in group cohesion when punishment is contingent on behaviors undermining collective interests. The present study addresses negative punishment and its effects on social environments when operant contingencies and metacontingencies are concurrent and when the punitive event is contingent on culturant. Three microcultures with three participants each were exposed to a task in which each participant chose a row in a figure with four numbered rows shown on a computer screen. The experimental design was ABCABC. Operant contingencies were programmed such that in all conditions choosing an odd row produced three blue tokens and choosing an even row produced one red token. Programmed metacontingencies predicted consequences on Impulsive Culturant (Imp Cult, three odd rows or two odd rows and one even row) and Self-controlled Culturant (Self-contr Cult, three even rows or two even rows and one odd row). In Condition A, any culturant resulted in one school item being added to an item counter. In Condition B, Imp Cult resulted in the loss of one item, and Self-contr Cult produced the addition of one item. Finally, in Condition C, no culturant produced losses or additions of items. The results indicated that negative punishment reduced the percentage of Imp Cult, particularly in MC1 and MC3, maintaining high percentages of Self-contr Cult. The results suggest that at the cultural level, the effects of negative punishment are similar to those observed at the operant level.

Keywords

Negative punishment Ethical self-control Concurrence Metacontingencies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the first author’s doctoral research under the guidance of Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho and was funded by the Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas (FAPESPA, Brasil), the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasil), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasil). We thank Ana Paula Coutinho, Damom Ribeiro, David Rabelo, João Aristides Almeida, Laís Corrêa, and Yan Valderlon for their assistance during data collection in the Laboratory of Social Behavior and Cultural Selection at the Universidade Federal do Pará (LACS/UFPA). We also thank Propesp/UFPA and Imagine Tecnologia Comportamental for their support.

References

  1. Alves, L. F. C., Carvalho Neto, M. B., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2018). Efeitos de consequências culturais análogas a reforçamento negativo sobre a recorrência de culturantes em microculturas de laboratório [The effects of cultural consequences analogous to negative reinforcement on the recurrence of culturants in laboratory microcultures]. Acta Comportamentalia, 26, 217–231.Google Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and applications (pp. 380–447). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  3. Baia, F. H., Azevedo, F. F., Segantini, S. M., & Macedo, R. P. (2015). Efeitos de diferentes magnitudes de consequências individuais e culturais sobre culturantes [Effects of different magnitudes of individual consequences and cultural consequences on culturants selection]. Acta Comportamentalia, 23(3), 257–272.Google Scholar
  4. Baia, F. H., Lemes, I. G., Biano, A. B. C., Pereira, R. S. C., & Sousa, L. D. (2017). Efeitos da programação e suspensão de metacontingências sobre operantes e culturantes [Effects of establishment and withdrawal metacontingencies upon operants and culturants]. Acta Comportamentalia, 25(4), 495–510.Google Scholar
  5. Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2017). Effects of cultural consequences on the interlocking behavioral contingencies of ethical self-control. The Psychological Record, 63(3), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0231-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3531–3535.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0630443100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brethower, D. M., & Reynolds, C. S. (1962). A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 191–199.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Catania, A. C. (1999). Aprendizagem: Comportamento, linguagem e cognição [Learning]. (4th. ed.). Porto Alegre, Brazil: ArtMed. (Original work published 1998.)Google Scholar
  9. Critchfield, T. S. (2014). Skeptic’s corner: Punishment-destructive force or valuable social “adhesive?”. Behavior Analysis Practice, 7, 36–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0005-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Critchfield, T. S., Paletz, E. M., Macaleese, K. R., & Newland, M. C. (2003). Punishment in human choice: Direct or competitive suppression? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 1–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Deluty, M. Z. (1976). Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 75–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.  https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis & Social Action, 6, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glenn, S. S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origins of cultures. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., . . . Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634
  18. Gomes, H. C. R., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2016). Metacontingências de autocontrole ético: Efeitos do aumento da magnitude de reforço [Metacontingencies of ethical self-control: Effects of increasing of the reinforcement magnitude]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(4), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e32422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guimarães, T. M. M., Leite, F. L., de Carvalho Neto, M. B., Tourinho, E. Z., & Tonneau, F. (2019). The effects of punishment in laboratory microcultures. Behavior & Social Issues, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00004-z
  20. Hosoya, N. M. d. S., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2016). Efeitos de interações verbais na seleção e manutenção de contingências comportamentais entrelaçadas [The effects of verbal interactions on the selection and maintenance of interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 24, 331–345.Google Scholar
  21. Hunziker, M. H. L. (2017). Dogmas sobre o controle aversivo [Dogmas on aversive control]. Acta Comportamentalia, 25(1), 85–100.Google Scholar
  22. Marlowe, F. W., Berbesque, J. C., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., . . . Tracer, D. (2008). More “altruistic” punishment in larger societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 275, 587–590.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1517
  23. Morford, Z. H., & Cihon, T. M. (2013). Developing an experimental analysis of metacontingencies: Considerations regarding cooperation in a four-person Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Behavior & Social Issues, 22, 5–20.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ortu, D., Becker, A. M., Woelz, T. A. R., & Glenn, S. S. (2012). An iterated four-player Prisoner's Dilemma Game with an external selecting agent: A metacontingency experiment. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44, 111–120.Google Scholar
  25. Picanço, C. R. F., & Guimarães, T. M. M. (2017). Free-Mtrix (Version 0.2.0.12).  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.854833.
  26. Rasmussen, E. B., & Newland, M. C. (2008). Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 157–167.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008.89-157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Saconatto, A. T., & Andery, M. A. (2013). Seleção por metacontingências: Um análogo de reforçamento negativo [Selection by metacontingencies: An analog of negative reinforcement]. Interação em Psicologia, 17(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v17i1.26779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampaio, A. A. S., Araújo, L. A. S., Gonçalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Alves-Filho, A. P., Brito, I. S., . . . Calado, J. I. F. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior & Social Issues, 22, 87–101.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180
  29. Soares, P. F. R., Martins, J. C. T., Guimarães, T. M. M., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2019). Effects of continuous and intermittent cultural consequences on culturants, in metacontingency concurrent with operant contingency. Behavior & Social Issues, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00009-8.
  30. Soares, P. F. R., Martins, J. C. T., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2015). Seleção de contingências comportamentais entrelaçadas por consequências culturais intermitentes [Selection of interlocking behavioral contingencies by intermitent cultural consequences]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 11(2), 117–124.  https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v11i2.3780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soares, P. F. R., Rocha, A. P. M. C., Guimarães, T. M. M., Leite, F. L., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2018). Effects of verbal and non-verbal cultural consequences on culturants. Behavior & Social Issues, 27, 31–46.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tagliabue, M., & Sandaker, I. (2019). Societal well-being: Embedding nudges in sustainable cultural practices. Behavior & Social Issues, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-0002-x.
  33. Tourinho, E. Z. (2013). Cultural consequences and interlocking behavioral contingencies: Selection at the cultural level. Behavior & Philosophy, 41, 60–69.Google Scholar
  34. Tourinho, E. Z., & Vichi, C. (2012). Behavioral-analytic research of cultural selection and the complexity of cultural phenomena. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44, 169–179.Google Scholar
  35. Vichi, C., Andery, M. A. P. A. & Glenn. S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: The effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior & Social Issues, 18, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292.

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Pará (Federal University of Pará; UFPA)BelémBrazil
  2. 2.Imagine Tecnologia ComportamentalFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations