Pedagogy of Academic Narrative: Insights from They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing by Graff and Birkenstein (2014)
- 136 Downloads
Hineline’s (elsewhere in this issue) analysis of narrative is noteworthy in three respects. First, it provides insights into the essential behavioral elements that may give rise to the larger behavioral experience of reading a narrative. Second, it suggests that mastering effective narrative may be critical to dissemination of our science and practice. Third, it models openness to what others beyond behavior science may contribute to our understanding. The last two points are the focus of my comments.
As a veteran teacher of undergraduates, I have come to view the teaching of writing as the thorniest problem to be solved in my job. Writing—in academia, in business, in life—is a complex but critical skill with which many students, teachers, and professionals struggle (e.g., see Brockman, Taylor, Crawford, & Kreth, 2010; Epting, 2011; Galton, 1908; National Association of College & Employers, 2015; National Center for Education Statistics, 2012; Pinker, 2014; Quible & Griffin, 2007;...
KeywordsNarrative Rhetoric Composition Studies Writing
I am grateful to the late Dr. Lizabeth A. Rand for her willing discussion of all things writing and our collaborations, and to Dr. Tom Critchfield for always supporting rather than squelching my beyond-the-boundaries interests as a behaviorist.
This work was partially supported by a Center for Writing Excellence Summer Scholarship Grant from Elon University.
- 2017’s most popular: The most popular articles, blogs, podcasts, and videos on our website over the year, 2017. (2018, January 3). American Scientist. Retrieved from https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/from-the-staff/2017s-most-popular.
- Anderson, P., Anson, C. M., Gonyea, R. M., & Paine, C. (2015). The contributions of writing to learning and development: results from a large-scale multi-institutional study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50, 199–235.Google Scholar
- Brockman, E., Taylor, M., Crawford, M. K., & Kreth, M. (2010). Helping students cross the threshold: implications from a university writing assessment. English Journal, 99(3), 42–49.Google Scholar
- Epting, L. K. (2011, August 11). Precision first. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2011/08/11/precision-first
- Galton, F. (1908). Suggestions for improving the literary style of scientific memoirs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature in the United Kingdom (Second Series), 27, 113–130.Google Scholar
- Gopen, G., & Swan, J. (2018). The science of scientific writing: if the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs. American Scientist. Retrieved from https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/the-long-view/the-science-of-scientific-writing (Original work published 1990).
- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They say/I say: the moves that matter in academic writing. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
- Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1999). Behavior modification: what it is and how to do it (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Minter, D., & Goodburn, A. M. (2004). A critical reading and revision strategy: glossing arguments as cultural work. Faculty Publications – Department of English, DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln. Paper 9.Google Scholar
- National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE). (2015). Job outlook 2016: the attributes employers want to see on new college graduates’ resumes. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from http://www.naceweb.org/s11182015/employers-look-for-in-new-hires.aspx.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: writing 2011. Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: the thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Reese, H. W. (1991). Mentalistic approaches to verbal behavior. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 151–177). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading-writing relationship: interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Camil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246–280). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar