Perspectives on Behavior Science

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 569–574 | Cite as

The Promotion of Behavioral Science Through Narrative: Sharing and Making It Your Own

  • Isaac CamachoEmail author
  • David Ruiz

The role of narrative in everyday living is unquestionable. People identify, describe and sometimes share through verbal descriptions the relations between real or fictional organisms and environments in complex yet integrated behavioral patterns of written and spoken communication. Yet we were hard pressed to find actual examples of a theoretical system that took into consideration this form of verbal behavior within behavioral science literature. Besides Kantor’s (1977) work on mediative and narrational language (p. 68) the topic appears not to be addressed in systematic ways that substantially enhance of our understanding of storytelling and narrative within the behavior analysis.

In this context, Professor Hineline’s (2018) paper places storytelling or narrative within the realm of functional analysis and empirical study. Starting from an uncontroversial recognition about the way in which narrative, as a type of verbal behavior, defines listeners/readers engagement and persuasion...


  1. Bicard, D. F., & Neef, N. A. (2002). Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaptation to changing contingencies in children with ADHD. Journal of Applied Behavior Analyisis, 35, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camacho, I. (2012). Resistencia y balance. IPyE: Revista de Psicología y Educación, 6, 15–23.Google Scholar
  3. Hineline, P.N. (2018). Why it’s important and how it works. Perspectives on Behavior Science. Google Scholar
  4. Kantor, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  5. Pérez, F. V. (2016). The evolution of the empirical work on verbal behavior. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 42, 36–56.Google Scholar
  6. Ribes, E., Fernández, C., Rueda, M., Talento, M., & López, F. (1980). Enseñanza, ejercicio e investigación de la psicología. Un modelo integral. México: Trillas.Google Scholar
  7. Ribes, E., & Rodríguez, E. (2001). Correspondence between instructions, performance and self-descriptions in a conditional discrimination task: The effects of feedback and type of matching response. The Psychological Record, 51, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Serrano, M. (2014). Psicología Iztacala: un proyecto conductista. In R. Pérez-Almonacid & A. D. Gómez Fuentes (Coords.) Emilio Ribes Iñesta. Una historia de proyectos institucionales de identidad disciplinar e innovación educativa. México: Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
  9. Sidman, M. (1989). Avoidance at Columbia. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  11. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala (2015). Plan de Estudios Psicología. [Program of Studies]. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, FESITlalnepantlaMexico
  2. 2.Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Estado de MéxicoMonterreyMexico

Personalised recommendations