Translating Behavior Analysis: a Spectrum Rather than a Road Map
- 223 Downloads
Much has been written about the potential benefits of translational research in behavior analysis, but a lack of consensus about what constitutes “translational” creates a barrier to effective knowledge–practice innovation within the discipline and across other sciences. We propose a tiered system, adapted from a biomedical translational pathway, for classifying behavior analysis research on a basic–applied spectrum. Tier 0 is blue sky basic science in which the subjects, behaviors, stimuli, and settings are selected for convenience. Tier 1 is use-inspired basic science with a socially important end game and research subject. Tier 2 is solution-oriented research that attempts to solve a specific problem in a socially important subject, but 1 or more aspects of the research are selected for purposes of experimental control rather than social importance. Tier 3 is applied behavior analysis research that studies a problem of social significance for the subject and involves behaviors, stimuli, and settings that are socially important. Tier 4 is impact assessment in which behavioral technology is applied with a direct benefit to society. We provide examples of behavior–analytic research in each tier and evaluate the potential benefits of organizing behavior analysis in this way.
KeywordsTranslational research pathway Basic–applied continuum Biomedical model Internal validity Social significance Experimental analysis of behavior Applied behavior analysis Scientific consequences Taxonomy
The authors wish to thank Michael Perone, Regina Carroll, and Editor Tom Critchfield for their invaluable input. Portions of this article were presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis Australia Inaugural Conference in 2016.
The authors contributed equally to this work and are listed alphabetically.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The authors have no relevant funding to declare.
- Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.Google Scholar
- Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991). The experimental analysis of human behavior: Indispensable, ancillary, or irrelevant? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 145–155.Google Scholar
- Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.Google Scholar
- Bergmann, S. C., Kodak, T. M., & LeBlanc, B. A. (2017). Effects of programmed errors of omission and commission during auditory-visual conditional discrimination training with typically developing children. The Psychological Record, 67, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0211-2.Google Scholar
- Boynton, B. R., & Elster, E. (2012). Translational research: A historical overview and contemporary reflections on the transformative nature of research. Journal of Research Administration, 43, 15–28.Google Scholar
- Bush, V. (1945). Science: the endless frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.Google Scholar
- Cheeran, B., Cohen, L., Dobkin, B., Ford, G., Greenwood, R., Howard, D., . . .Wolf, S. (2009). The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: Driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308326636.
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2004). Conduits of translation in behavior-science bridge research. In J. E. Burgos & E. Ribes (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological applications in behavior science: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 45–84). Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara Press.Google Scholar
- Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2009). What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models? The Behavior Analyst, 32, 339–362.Google Scholar
- Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., Kime, D., & Daar, J. H. (2017). Establishing derived categorical responding in children with disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.355.Google Scholar
- Fernandez-Moure, J. S. (2016). Lost in translation: The gap in scientific advancements and clinical application. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00043.
- Goldblatt, E. M., & Lee, W. (2010). From bench to bedside: The growing use of translational research in cancer medicine. American Journal of Translational Research, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Hake, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.Google Scholar
- Henley, A. J., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Reed, D. D., & Kaplan, B. A. (2016). A crowdsourced nickel-and-dime approach to analog OBM research: A behavioral economic framework for understanding workforce attrition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.220.Google Scholar
- Higgins, S. T., Reed, D. D., Redner, R., Skelly, J. M., Zvorsky, I. A., & Kurti, A. N. (2017). Simulating demand for cigarettes among pregnant women: A low-risk method for studying vulnerable populations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.232.Google Scholar
- Kellam, S. G., Wang, W., Mackenzie, A. C., Brown, C. H., Ompad, D. C., Or, F., … Windham, A. (2014). The impact of the good behavior game, a universal classroom-based preventive intervention in first and second grades, on high-risk sexual behaviors and drug abuse and dependence disorders into young adulthood. Prevention Science, 15, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0296-z.
- Lattal, K. A., & Laipple, J. S. (2003). Pragmatism and behavior analysis. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 41–61). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- Ledbetter-Cho, K., Lang, R., Davenport, K., Moore, M., Lee, A., O’Reilly, M., Watkins, L., & Falcomata, T. (2016). Behavioral skills training to improve the abduction-prevention skills of children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0128-x.Google Scholar
- Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.Google Scholar
- Magoon, M. A., Critchfield, T. S., Merrill, D., Newland, M. C., & Schneider, W. J. (2017). Are positive and negative reinforcement “different”? Insights from a free-operant differential outcomes effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.243.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, A., Lalonde, K., Edwards, T., Cox, C., Weetjens, B., & Poling, A. (2014). Landmine-detection rats: An evaluation of reinforcement procedures under simulated operational conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.83.Google Scholar
- McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Egger, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). A pilot study of the relations within which hearing voices participates: Towards a functional distinction between voice hearers and controls. The Psychological Record, 66, 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0196-x.Google Scholar
- McIlvane, W. J. (2009). Translational behavior analysis: From laboratory science in stimulus control to intervention with persons with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 273–280.Google Scholar
- Mullane, M. P., Martens, B. K., Baxter, E. L., & Steeg, D. V. (2017). Children’s preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement: A translational study of risky choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.234.Google Scholar
- Peters-Scheffer, N., Didden, R., Korzilius, H., & Matson, J. (2012). Cost comparison of early intensive behavioral intervention and treatment as usual for children with autism spectrum disorder in the Netherlands. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1763–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.006.Google Scholar
- Poling, A., Valverde, E., Beyene, N., Mulder, C., Cox, C., Mgode, G., & Edwards, T. L. (2017). Active tuberculosis detection by pouched rats in 2014: More than 2,000 new patients found in two countries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.356.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Stitzer, M., Matheson, T., Cunningham, C., Sorensen, J. L., Feaster, D. J., Gooden, L., … Metsch, L. R. (2017). Enhancing patient navigation to improve intervention session attendance and viral load suppression of persons with HIV and substance use: A secondary post hoc analysis of the Project HOPE study. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 12, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-017-0081-1.
- Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr, Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., … Larson, E. L. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1278–1287. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.
- Wheeler, T. A. (2015, March 19). Taxonomy matters. Here’s why [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://lymanmuseum.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/taxonomy-matters-heres-why/.
- Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, J., & Woosley, R. (2008). The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Annual Review of Medicine, 59, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.59.090506.155819.Google Scholar
- Zimmermann, Z. J., Watkins, E. E., & Poling, A. (2015). JEAB research over time: Species used, experimental designs, statistical analyses, and sex of subjects. The Behavior Analyst, 38, 203–218.Google Scholar