(I Think) You Are Pretty: a Behavior Analytic Conceptualization of Flirtation
- 253 Downloads
Much research in flirtation has been approached from a socio-cognitive perspective and has overemphasized subjective self-reports rather than overt behavior. Existing work pertinent to flirtation is reviewed here in addition to proposing a behavior-analytic perspective on the topic with a conception that includes both rule-governed and contingency-shaped behavior. Of particular interest within a verbal behavior conception of flirtation is the importance of autoclitics—features of a verbal response that affect the listener’s reaction to the rest of the verbal response. Applications of a behavior analytic conception of flirtation and future directions relevant to research on interpersonal relationships are discussed.
KeywordsAutoclitics Interpersonal relationships Rule-governed behavior Contingency-shaped behavior Flirtation
The author would like to thank Donald Hantula, Philip Hineline, Traci Cihon, Elizabeth Lorah, and Kevin Marchini for invaluable feedback on drafts of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Abrahams, M. F. (1994). Perceiving flirtatious communication: An exploration of the perceptual dimensions underlying judgments of flirtatiousness. The Journal of Sex Research, 31(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499409551763.
- Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.Google Scholar
- Baruch, D. E., Kanter, J. W., Busch, A. M., Plummer, M. D., Tsai, M., Rusch, L. C., Landes, S. J., & Holman, G. I. (2009). Lines of evidence in support of FAP. In A guide to functional analytic psychotherapy: Awareness, courage, love and behaviorism (pp. 21–36). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Callaghan, G. M., Follette, W. C., Ruckstuhl Jr., L. E., & Linnerooth, P. J. N. (2008). The Functional Analytic Psychotherapy Rating Scale (FAPRS): A behavioral psychotherapy coding system. The Behavior Analyst Today, 9(1), 98–116.Google Scholar
- Catania, C. A. (2007). Learning. (interim 4th Ed.). New York: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.113.
- de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1974). Competence and performance in child language: Are children really competent to judge? Journal of Child Language, 1, 11–22.Google Scholar
- Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01897.x.
- Grammar, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A., & Fink, B. (2000). Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00053-2.
- Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In Behavior Analysis of Language and Cognition, S.C. Hayes, L.J. Hayes, M. Sato, and K. Ono, eds., context press, Reno, NV (pp. 9–30).Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: Examining miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b.
- Hineline, P. N. (1986). Re-tuning the operant-respondent distinction. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., & Stinson, L. L. (1990). Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 16–44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol XVIII). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Keyton, J., & Menzie, K. (2007). Sexually harassing messages: Decoding workplace conversation. Communication Studies, 58(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970601168756.
- Koeppel, L. B., Montagne-Miller, Y., O’Hair, D., & Cody, M. J. (1993). Friendly? Flirting? Wrong? In P. J. Kalbfliesch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 13–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
- Kohlenberg, R. J., Tsai, M., & Kanter, J. W. (2009). What is functional analytic psychotherapy? In: A guide to functional analytic psychotherapy: awareness, courage, love and behaviorism (pp. 1–19). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, K. E. (1994). Do as I say, not as I do. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carmen, L., Ruiz, F. J., Vizcaίno Torres, R. M., Sánchez Martίn, V., Gutiérrez Martίnez, O., & López López, J. C. (2011). A relational frame analysis of defusion interactions in acceptance and commitment therapy. A preliminary and quasi-experimental study with at-risk adolescents. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
- Moore, M. M. (1985). Non-verbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(85)90016-0.
- Muehlenhard, C. L., Koralewski, M. A., Andrews, S. L., & Burdick, C. A. (1986). Verbal and nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating: Two studies. Behavior Therapy, 17, 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80071-5.
- Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
- Practical Happiness (2009). Revolution in Dating & Relationship Advice: Actual example of meeting a woman online and first phone conversation. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from http://www.practicalhappiness.com/meeting-woman-online-and-first-phone-conversation.
- Prepin, K., Ochs, M., Pelachaud, C. (2013). Beyond backchannels: co-construction of dyadic stance by reciprocal reinforcement of smiles between virtual agents. In: Proceedings of the 35 th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Google Scholar
- Sabini, J. & Silver, M. (1982). Flirtation and ambiguity. Moralities of everyday life. (pp.107–123). Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Kohlenberg, B., Follette, W. C., & Callaghan, G. M. (2009). A guide to functional analytic psychotherapy: Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vilardaga, R., Estévez, A., Levin, M. E., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). Deictic relational responding, empathy, and experiential avoidance as predictors of social anhedonia: Further contributions from relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 62, 409–432.Google Scholar
- Villatte, M., Monestès, J., McHugh, L., Freixa i Baqué, E., & Loas, G. (2010). Adopting the perspective of another in belief attribution: Contribution of relational frame theory to the understanding of impairments in schizophrenia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.11.004.
- Williams, G., & Greer, R. D. (1993). A comparison of verbal-behavior and linguistic communication curricula for training developmentally delayed adolescents to acquire and maintain vocal speech. Behavior, 1, 31–46.Google Scholar
- Wade, J. A. (2013). Analyzing “word games:” Complex functions of language during traditional face-to-face speed-dating and online speed-dating events. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive behavioral research and therapy (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar