Coal Is Not Black, Snow Is Not White, Food Is Not a Reinforcer: The Roles of Affordances and Dispositions in the Analysis of Behavior
- 2.1k Downloads
Reinforcers comprise sequences of actions in context. Just as the white of snow and black of coal depend on the interaction of an organism’s visual system and the reflectances in its surrounds, reinforcers depend on an organism’s motivational state and the affordances—possibilities for perception and action—in its surrounds. Reinforcers are not intrinsic to things but are a relation between what the thing affords, its context, the organism, and his or her history as capitulated in their current state. Reinforcers and other affordances are potentialities rather than intrinsic features. Realizing those potentialities requires motivational operations and stimulus contexts that change the state of the organism—they change its disposition to make the desired response. An expansion of the three-term contingency is suggested in order to help keep us mindful of the importance of behavioral systems, states, emotions, and dispositions in our research programs.
KeywordsAffordance Affordee Dispositions Four-term contingency Emotion Law of effect Linear algebra Motivation Notation States
We appreciate the formative commentary from four anonymous reviewers and AE and from Amy Odum, Tim Shahan, Tom Taylor, Travis Thompson, and Max Hocutt. This is not to imply that they endorse the views expressed in this paper; just that it would have been worse without their help.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Balsam, P. D., Deich, J. D., Ohyama, T., & Stokes, P. D. (1998). Origins of new behavior. In W. T. O’Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 403–420). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: how body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Baum, W. M. (2005). Understanding behaviorism: behavior, culture, and evolution (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Burgos, J. E. (2016). Antidualism and antimentalism in radical behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy, 43, 1–37.Google Scholar
- Catania, A. C. (2013). A natural science of behavior. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 133–139. 10.1037/a0033026
- Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. (1971). The "superstition" experiment: A re-examination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B. (2016). Pre-Suasion: A Revolutionary Way to Influence and Persuade: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Revised edition).Google Scholar
- Dezfouli, A., Lingawi, N. W., & Balleine, B. W. (2014). Habits as action sequences: hierarchical action control and changes in outcome value. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1655). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0482.
- Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Fanselow, M. S., & Lester, L. S. (1988). A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher (Eds.), Evolution and learning (pp. 185–212). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Foxall, G. R. (2004). Context and cognition: interpreting complex behavior. Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Freedman, D. H. (2012). The Perfected Self. The Atlantic, 42–52. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/06/the-perfected-self/308970/
- Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published in 1979)Google Scholar
- Goldstein, N. J., Martin, S. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Yes! 50 scientifically proven ways to be persuasive. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1985). Mentalism and the “as-yet-unexplained”: a reply to Killeen. Behaviorism, 13(2), 151–154.Google Scholar
- Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.
- Hineline, P. N., & Groeling, S. M. (2011). Behavior analytic language and interventions for autism. In E. A. Mayville & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Behavioral foundations of effective autism treatment (pp. 35–55). New York: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, K. W., Isenhower, R. W., & Hayes, L. J. (2016). A multiscaled approach to privacy. Conductual, 4(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
- Killeen, P. R. (1984). Emergent behaviorism. Behaviorism, 12, 25–39.Google Scholar
- Killeen, P. R. (2004). Minding behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 125–147.Google Scholar
- Killeen, P. R. (2014). Pavlov + Skinner = Premack. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27(4), 544–568.Google Scholar
- Killeen, P. R. (2015). The logistics of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104, 74–92. 10.1002/jeab.156
- Koganezawa, M., Kimura, K.-i., & Yamamoto, D. (2016). The neural circuitry that functions as a switch for courtship versus aggression in drosophila males. Current Biology, 26(11), 1395–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.017
- Land, E. H. (1964). The retinex. American Scientist, 52, 247–264.Google Scholar
- Land, E. H. (1983). Recent advances in retinex theory and some implications for cortical computations: color vision and the natural image. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 80(16), 5163–5169. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.16.5163.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Musairah, S. K. M. K. (2016). Mediation and moderation analysis from the perspective of behavioral science. Jurnal Intelek, 10(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Nomoto, K., & Lima, S. Q. (2015). Enhanced male-evoked responses in the ventromedial hypothalamus of sexually receptive female mice. Current Biology, 25(5), 589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.048
- Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. http://jnd.org/dn.mss/affordance_conventions_and_design_part_2.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ortu, D., & Vaidya, M. (2016). The challenges of integrating behavioral and neural data: bridging and breaking boundaries across levels of analysis. Behavior Analyst, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s40614-016-0074-5.
- Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2001). Cycles of contingency. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Place, U. (1987). Skinner re-skinned. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: consensus and controversy (pp. 239–248). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Premack, D. (1971). Catching up with common sense, or two sides of a generalization: reinforcement and punishment. In R. Blaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement (pp. 121–150). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Rachlin, H. R. (1998). Teleological behaviorism. In W. O’Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Handbook of behaviorism (pp. 195–215). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., Riley, M. R., Fajen, B. R., & Turvey, M. T. (2008). Ecological psychology: six principles for an embodied-embedded approach to behavior. In P. Calvo & A. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach (pp. 161–190). San Diego: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00009-8.Google Scholar
- Schnaitter, R. (1987). Knowledge as action: the epistemology of radical behaviorism. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: consensus and controversy (pp. 57–68). New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Segal, E. F. (1972). Induction and the provenance of operants. In R. M. Gilbert & J. R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: behavioral analyses (pp. 1–34). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1974). About Behaviorism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Staddon, J. E. R. (1998). Theoretical behaviorism. In W. O’Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Handbook of behaviorism (pp. 217–241). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Swails, J. A., Zettle, R. D., Burdsal, C. A., & Snyder, J. J. (2016). The experiential approach scale: development and preliminary psychometric properties. The Psychological Record, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s40732-016-0188-x.
- Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The psychology of learning. New York: Mason-Henry Press.Google Scholar
- Thorndike, E. L. (1935). The psychology of wants, interests and attitudes. Oxford: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
- Timberlake, W. (2001). Motivational modes in behavior systems. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 155–209). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Timberlake, W. (2004). Is the operant contingency enough for a science of purposive behavior? Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 197–229.Google Scholar
- Trask, S., Thrailkill, E. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2016). Occasion setting, inhibition, and the contextual control of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental (operant) learning. Behavioural Processes (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.003
- Zuriff, G. (1979). Ten inner causes. Behaviorism, 7(1), 1–8.Google Scholar