Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 109–121 | Cite as

Contributions of Behavioral Systems Science to Leadership for a New Progressive Movement

  • Mark A. MattainiEmail author
  • Roberto Aspholm
Original Article

Abstract

We argue in this paper that we are in the midst of a period in which fundamental global change will be required if societies and many species, perhaps even our own, are to survive. The realities are inescapable, and the potential implications are likely to affect nearly every dimension of human life in the USA and globally. Current trends are discouraging and will be extraordinarily difficult to shift, given global structural realities. It is hard to imagine a time when effective leadership is more necessary or will be more challenging. Our thesis here is that behavioral systems science can contribute in meaningful ways to shaping and sustaining such leadership, leadership required to advance a new progressive movement.

Keywords

Behavioral systems science New progressive movement Cultural analysis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arena, J. (2012). Driven from New Orleans: how nonprofits betray public housing and promote privatization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspholm, R. R. (in preparation). “This ain’t the’90s”: Chicago’s black street gangs in the twenty-first century (Dissertation in preparation). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Bangalore, S., & Messerli, F. H. (2013). Gun ownership and firearm-related deaths. The American Journal of Medicine, 126(10), 873–876.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices. Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biglan, A. (2015). The nurture effect: how the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  7. Biglan, A., & Hinds, E. (2009). Evolving prosocial and sustainable neighborhoods and communities. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 169–196. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663939/pdf/nihms84433.pdf
  8. Boyes-Watson, C. (2008). Peacemaking circles and urban youth: bringing justice home. St. Paul: Living Justice Press.Google Scholar
  9. Briceño-León, R., & Zubillaga, V. (2002). Violence and globalization in Latin America. Current Sociology, 50(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cashman, S. D. (1993). America in the gilded Age: from the death of Lincoln to the rise of Theodore Roosevelt. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Data & statistics (WISQARS): Cost of injury reports. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/cost/cost-learn-more.html
  12. Chambers, J. W., II. (2000). The tyranny of change: American in the progressive Era 1890–1920. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chance, P. (2007). The ultimate challenge: proving B F. Skinner wrong. The Behavior Analyst, 30(2), 153–160.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Conteh-Morgan, E. (2006). Globalization, state failure, and collective violence: the case of Sierra Leone. International Journal of Peace Studies, 11(2), 87–103.Google Scholar
  16. Cullen, J. B., & Levitt, S. D. (1999). Crime, urban flight, and the consequences for cities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. DeBacker, J., Heim, B., Panousi, V., Ramnath, S., & Vidangos, I. (2013). Rising inequality: transitory or persistent? New evidence from a panel of U.S. tax returns. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 2013, 67–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farmer, P. (2003). Pathologies of power: health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fawcett, S. B., Bernstein, G. S., Czyzewski, M. J., Greene, B. F., Hannah, G. T., Iwata, B. A. … Winnett, R. A. (1988). Behavior analysis and public policy. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 11–25.Google Scholar
  21. Glenn S. S. (2010). Metacontingencies, selection, and OBM: Comments on “emergence and metacontingency”. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant, L. K. (2011). Can we consume our way out of climate change? A call for analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 245–266.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, L. K. (2014). Insatiability: part of the problem or part of the solution? Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenbaum, R. T., & Tita, G. E. (2004). The impact of violence surges on neighborhood business activity. Urban Studies, 41(13), 2495–2514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guerin, B., & Miyazaki, Y. (2006). Analyzing rumors, gossip, and urban legends through their conversational properties. The Psychological Record, 56, 23–34.Google Scholar
  26. Hagedorn, J. M. (2008). A world of gangs: armed young men and gangsta culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Havel, V. (1987). The power of the powerless. In J. Vladislav (Ed.), Václav Havel: living in truth (pp. 36–122). London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. D. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hedges, C., & Sacco, J. (2012). Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumhof, M., & Rancière, R. (2010). Inequality, leverage, and crisis (IMF Working Paper 10/268). Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  34. Leigland, S. (2011). Beyond freedom and dignity at 40: comments on behavioral science, the future, and Chance (2007). The Behavior Analyst, 34, 283–295. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3211387/pdf/bhan-34-02-283.pdf
  35. Lindner, C. (2009). Globalization, violence, and the visual culture of cities. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Luke, M., & Mattaini, M. A. (2014). “Saving the world” with a matrix. Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 1–4.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, A. K., & Rasmussen, D. W. (2001). Measuring the impact of crime on house prices. Applied Economics, 33(15), 1981–1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change: engineering organizations with behavioral systems analysis. Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mattaini, M. A. (2001). Peace power for adolescents: strategies for a culture of nonviolence. Washington: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolent power: the science of satyagraha. Edmonton: AU Press.Google Scholar
  41. McGerr, M. (2003). A fierce discontent: the rise and fall of the progressive movement in America, 1870–1920. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Moore, S. K., & Mattaini, M. A. (2001). Consequence analysis: an on-line replication. Behavior and Social Issues, 11, 71–79. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v11i1.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morris, A. D. (1986). Origins of the civil rights movement. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  44. Nevin, J. A. (2005). The inertia of affluence. Behavior and Social Issues, 14, 7–20. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v14i1.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Crisis squeezes income and puts pressure on inequality and poverty: Results from the OECD Income Distribution Database. Paris, FR: Author.Google Scholar
  46. Pacala, S. (2007). Equitable solutions to greenhouse warming: on the distribution of wealth, emissions and responsibility within and between nations. Paper presented at the IIASA 35th Anniversary Conference, Vienna, AT.Google Scholar
  47. Painter, N. I. (2008). Standing at Armageddon: a grassroots history of the progressive Era. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  48. Perlo-Freeman, S., & Solmirano, C. (2014). Trends in world military expenditure, 2013. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Piven, F. F. (2008). Challenging authority: how ordinary people change America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. Rumph, R., Ninness, C., McCuller, G., & Ninness, S. K. (2005). Twenty years later, commentary on Skinner’s “Why we are not acting to save the world.”. Behavior and Social Issues, 14, 1–6. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v14i1.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schell, J. (2003). The unconquerable world: power, nonviolence, and the will of the people. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  52. Schmitt, J., Warner, K., & Gupta, S. (2010). The high budgetary cost of incarceration. Washington: Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  53. Singer, M. I., Anglin, T. M., Song, L. Y., & Lunghofer, L. L. (1995). Adolescents’ exposure to violence and associated symptoms of psychological trauma. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(6), 477–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Skinner, B. F. (1982). The contrived reinforcer. The Behavior Analyst, 5(1), 3–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Why we are not acting to save the world. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Upon further reflection (pp. 1–14). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  56. Skocpol, T. (1995). Protecting soldiers and mothers: the origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Spence, M., & Hlatshwayo, S. (2011). The evolving structure of the American economy and the employment challenge (Council on Foreign Relations Working Paper). Washington: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  58. Tichi, C. (2009). Civic passions: seven who launched progressive America (and what they teach us). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  59. Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. UN-HABITAT. (2006). State of the world’s cities report 2006/7. Nairobi, KE: Author.Google Scholar
  61. UNICEF Office of Research. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: a comparative overview. Florence, IT: Author.Google Scholar
  62. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2009). Report of the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Global study on homicide. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
  64. Walmsley, R. (2013). World prison population list (10th ed.). London: International Centre for Prison Studies.Google Scholar
  65. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology. (2000). Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(4), 413–426.Google Scholar
  66. World Bank. (2011). World development report: Conflict, security, and development. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations