Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 119–124 | Cite as

Upon Further Reflection: View from the Other Side of “Windows on the 21st Century”

  • Sigrid S. GlennEmail author
Article

Abstract

Three points discussed in Glenn (1993) are reviewed in the context of current events: the discipline of behavior analysis as a cultural system, the importance of that discipline in the training and regulation of behavior analytic practitioners, and Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) as a cultural subsystem that links to all the other parts and therefore links the other parts to one another. Noting similarities between behavior analysis and biology, I consider the growth of biological sciences as a model for behavior analysis. Of particular importance for biology has been the role of basic biological sciences in the practice of medicine and the resulting feedback loops that have developed among its basic sciences, applied sciences, and medical practice. I suggest that behavior analysis explicitly follow this model and that ABAI has a critical role to play in leading the field to developing the feedback loops that have integrated the biological sciences and medicine.

Keywords

Science Practice Biology Medicine Association for Behavior Analysis Feedback loops 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I thank Matt Normand for the invitation to ponder again these topics and for his patience while I sorted out what I had to say. I also thank Philip N. Hineline for encouraging me actually to submit it; his astute comments and editorial suggestions are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101–124.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donahoe, J. W. (2003). Selectionism. In K.A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds), Behavior Theory and Philosophy. New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Eldridge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Glenn, S. S. (1993). Windows on the 21st century. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 133–151.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenn, S. S., & Madden, G. J. (1995). Units of interaction, evolution and replication: organic and behavioral parallels. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 237–251.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Hull, D. L., Langman, R., & Glenn, S. S. (2001). General analysis of selection: biology, immunology, and behavior. The Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 511–528.Google Scholar
  9. Madden, G. M. (Ed.). (2013). APA handbook of behavior analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  10. Mayr, E., & Provine, W. (1980). The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McSweeney, F. K. & Murphy, E.S. (Eds) (2014). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of operant and classical conditioning. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Merio, L. M. F., Pepper, J. W., Reid, B. J., & Maley, C. C. (2006). Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Cancer, 6, 924–35. doi: 10.1038/nrc2013.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, D. S. (2001). The dependent gene: the fallacy of “nature vs. nurture.”. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  14. Neuringer, A. (1993). Reinforced variation and selection. Animal Leraning and Behavior, 21, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neuringer, A. (2011). Reach out. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 27–29. PMC3089408.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: a developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott, T. (1991). A personal view of the future of psychology departments. American Psychologist, 46, 975–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shryock, R, H. (1936/1974). The development of modern medicine. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sidman, M. (1994). Stimulus equivalence: a research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavior AnalysisUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations