Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Did John B. Watson Really “Found” Behaviorism?

  • John C. MaloneEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Developments culminating in the nineteenth century, along with the predictable collapse of introspective psychology, meant that the rise of behavioral psychology was inevitable. In 1913, John B. Watson was an established scientist with impeccable credentials who acted as a strong and combative promoter of a natural science approach to psychology when just such an advocate was needed. He never claimed to have founded “behavior psychology” and, despite the acclaim and criticism attending his portrayal as the original behaviorist, he was more an exemplar of a movement than a founder. Many influential writers had already characterized psychology, including so-called mental activity, as behavior, offered many applications, and rejected metaphysical dualism. Among others, William Carpenter, Alexander Bain, and (early) Sigmund Freud held views compatible with twentieth-century behaviorism. Thus, though Watson was the first to argue specifically for psychology as a natural science, behaviorism in both theory and practice had clear roots long before 1913. If behaviorism really needs a “founder,” Edward Thorndike might seem more deserving, because of his great influence and promotion of an objective psychology, but he was not a true behaviorist for several important reasons. Watson deserves the fame he has received, since he first made a strong case for a natural science (behaviorist) approach and, importantly, he made people pay attention to it.

Keywords

John B. Watson Behaviorism History William B. Carpenter Alexander Bain Sigmund S. Freud Edward L. Thorndike 

References

  1. Bain, A. (1879). The senses and the intellect (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton. 1st & 2nd eds. 1855, 1868.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, F. A. (1961). Karl Spencer Lashley: biographical memoir. New York: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann, G. (1956). The contribution of John B. Watson. Psychological Review, 63, 265–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjork, D. W. (1993). B. F. Skinner: a life. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Boakes, R. A. (1984). From Darwin to behaviourism: psychology and the minds of animals. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buckley, K. W. (1989). Mechanical man: John Broadus Watson and the beginnings of behaviorism. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Burnham, J. C. (1968). On the origins of behaviorism. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 4, 143–151.Google Scholar
  8. Burnham, J. C. (1994). John B. Watson: interviewee, professional figure, symbol. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism (pp. 65–73). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter, W. B. (1875). Principles of mental physiology. New York: Appleton, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  10. Catania, A. C. (1999). Thorndike’s legacy: learning, selection, and the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 425–428.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coon, D. J. (1994). “Not a creature of reason”: the alleged impact of Watsonian behaviorism on advertising in the 1920s. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism (pp. 37–63). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  12. DiClemente, D., & Hantula, D. A. (2000). John Broadus Watson: I/O psychologist. The Industrial Psychologist, 37(4), 47–55.Google Scholar
  13. DiClemente, D., & Hantula, D. A. (2003). Applied behavioral economics and consumer choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunlap, K. (1912). The case against introspection. Psychological Review, 19, 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. In W. Russell (Ed.), (1970) Milestones in motivation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1915).Google Scholar
  16. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In Standard Edition (Vol. 23). Google Scholar
  17. Galton, F. (1876). The history of twins, as criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 5, 391–406.Google Scholar
  18. Galton, F. (1901). The history of twins. Teachers College Record, 2(3), 260-274.Google Scholar
  19. Gay, P. (1989). The Freud reader. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Hannush, M. J. (1987). Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences. xxx, 137–152.Google Scholar
  21. Herrnstein, R. J. (1958). Some factors influencing behavior in a two-response situation. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 21, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter, W. S. (1922). An open letter to the anti-behaviorists. Journal of Philosophy, 19, 307–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacoby, R. (2009). Freud’s visit to Clark U. The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review. 9/29.Google Scholar
  24. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jastrow, J. (1929). Review of Watson, J. B., The Ways of Behaviorism, Harper Bros., 1928; Psychological Care of Infant and Child, Norton, 1928; J. B. Watson and W. McDougall, The Battle of Behaviorism, Norton, 1929. Science, LXIX, 455–457.Google Scholar
  26. Joncich, G. (1968). The sane positivist. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, M. C. (1924). A laboratory study of fear: the case of Peter. Pedagogical Seminary, 31, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kantor, J. R. (1963). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vol. 1). Bloomington: Principia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lashley, K. S., & Watson, J. B. (1920). A psychological study of motion pictures in relation to venereal disease campaigns. Social Hygiene, 7, 181–219.Google Scholar
  30. Lattal, K. A. (1998). A century of effect: legacies of E. L. Thorndike’s Animal Intelligence monograph. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loomis, L. R. (1943). Aristotle: on man in the universe. Roslyn, NY: Walter J. Black, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Malone, J. C. (1990). Theories of learning: a historical view. (paperback ed. 2002). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  33. Malone, J. C. (2009). Psychology: Pythagoras to present. (paperback ed. 2011). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Moore, J. C. (2008). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism. Cornwell-on-Hudson: Sloan.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, E. K. (2014). The legacy of John B. Watson’s behaviorist manifesto for applied behavior analysis. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, in press.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, E. K., Altus, D. E., & Smith, N. G. (2013). A study in the founding of applied behavior analysis through its publications. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 73–107.Google Scholar
  37. Rachlin, H. (1994). Behavior and mind: the roots of modern psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rand, A. (1982). Philosophy: who needs it? Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co.Google Scholar
  39. Russell, B. (1921). The analysis of mind. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. Samelson, F. (1994). John B. Watson in 1913: rhetoric and practice. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism (pp. 3–18). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. F. (1959). John Broadus Watson, behaviorist. Science, 129, 198–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skinner, B. F. (1966). The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Science, 153, 1205–1213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: an experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplements, 2(Serial No. 8).Google Scholar
  45. Thorndike, E. L. (1901a). Notes on child study. New York: Macmillan. Vol. 8, Nos. 3–4.Google Scholar
  46. Thorndike, E. L. (1901b). The human nature club. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  47. Thorndike, E. L. (1919). Intelligence and its uses. Harpers, CXV, December 1919–May 1920, 235.Google Scholar
  48. Thorndike, E. L. (1940). Human nature and the social order. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Thorndike, E. L. (1949). Selected writings from a connectionist’s psychology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  50. Todd, J. T. (1994). What psychology has to say about John B. Watson: classical behaviorism in psychology textbooks, 1920–1989. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism (pp. 76–107). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  51. Tomlinson, S. (1997). Edward Lee Thorndike and John Dewey on the science of education. Oxford Review of Education, 23, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watson, J. B. (1916). The psychology of wish fulfillment. Scientific Monthly, 3, 479–487.Google Scholar
  55. Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watson, J. B. (1922). “The analysis of mind,” Dial, vol. 72, pp. 97–102. (Review of Russell, Bertrand (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  57. Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.Google Scholar
  58. Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Watson, J. B. (1936). John B. Watson. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography. Worcester: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Woodworth, R. S. (1931). Contemporary schools of psychology. New York: Ronald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations