Undervalued and Overrepresented: Voices of Migrant Domestic Workers in India
- 1 Downloads
In India and globally, domestic work continues to be one of the professions that is rooted in the history of colonialism, slavery, and servitude due to lack of workplace regulation and one-on-one power negotiation between the employer and the worker. Thousands of households in urban India are dependent upon domestic workers for tasks such as cooking, cleaning, washing, ironing, and caregiving. This profession predominantly consists of women from low socioeconomic families, and scheduled caste and tribe. Additionally, due to urbanization and a decline in the agricultural industry, majority of the domestic workers have migrated from various parts of the country due to poverty. The migrant women domestic workers (MWDWs) are often faced with exploitative conditions at the workplace and their social environment. Previous studies and policy initiatives have focused on workplace exploitation. However, there are challenges that go beyond the confines of the employer’s house that adversely impact the well-being of the MWDW. Using a social work lens that emphasizes the impact of the sociocultural, and economic environment on an individual’s wellbeing, the current study aims to go beyond the direct employer–employee relationship. This study analyses data from 91 MWDWs from 6 states in India—(i) Bihar, (ii) Jharkhand, (iii) Karnataka, (iv) Madhya Pradesh, (v) Odisha, and (vi) Uttar Pradesh. The results of the study contribute towards (i) providing an insight on the everyday hardships of the MWDW (ii) emphasizing the need to diversify the discourse of domestic workers’ rights and well-being to include the role of the family, community, state, and national level infrastructure, and (iii) recommending alternative approaches for securing decent work and overall well-being that can supplement government legislation.
KeywordsDomestic workers Human rights Poverty Worker rights Migrant workers
Compliance with Ethical Standards
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Additionally, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barua, P., Waldrop, A., & Haukanes, H. (2017). From benevolent maternalism to the market logic: exploring discursive boundary making in domestic work relations in India. Clinical Asian Studies, 49(4), 481–500.Google Scholar
- Bedri, N., Ibrahim Abdelmoneim, S., Tambal, N., & Adam, S. (2015). Factors influencing access of women migrant domestic workers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services at Khartoum State: the case of Ethiopian migrant domestic workers. Ahfad Journal, 32(2), 25–35.Google Scholar
- Bose, P. & Srivastava, P. (2017). Water supply for urban poor in India. Water AID. Retrieved: http://wateraidindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Water-Supply-for-Urban-Poor-in-India-WEB.pdf.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.Google Scholar
- Chakravarti, U. (2018). Gendering caste: through a feminist lens. Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Chari, A. (2009). Gendered citizenship & women’s movement. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(17), 47–57.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscriminatory doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8).Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.Google Scholar
- Crépeau, F. (2014). Report of special repportuer on the human rights of migrants. United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
- Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: gender, race, and reproductive labor in the historical perspective. Gender & Society, 21(3), 313–336.Google Scholar
- Elmagboul, N., Dauod, S., & Tawaldi, S. (2017). Exploitation and violence against Ethiopian female irregular migrant domestic workers in Khartoum State. Ahfad Journal, 34(2), 19–29.Google Scholar
- Fortunati, L. (1995). The arcane of reproduction: housework, prostitution, labor and capital. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
- Gao, X., Chan, C. W., Mak, S. L., Ng, Z., et al. (2014). Oral health of foreign domestic workers: Exploring the social determinants. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16(5), 926–933 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.seattleu.edu/10.1007/s10903-013-9789-5.Google Scholar
- Geertz, A., Iyer, L., Kasen, P., Mazzola, F., & Peterson, K. (2016). An opportunity to address menstrual health and gender equity. Boston: FSG Boston.Google Scholar
- Government of India (2019). Census data 2010. Housing. Retrieved: http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/housing.aspx.
- Gutierrez-Rodriguez, E. (2010). Migration, domestic work, and affect: a decolonial approach on value and the feminization of labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: from margin to center. South End Press.Google Scholar
- International Labor Organization. (2011). C189: convention concerning decent work for domestic workers. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C189.
- International Labor Organization. (2013). Domestic workers across the world: global and regional statistics and the extent of legal protection. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/%2D%2D-publ/documents/publication/wcms_173363.pdf.
- International Labor Organization. (2015). Migrant domestic workers across the world: global and regional estimates. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-ed_protect/%2D%2D-protrav/%2D%2D-migrant/documents/briefingnote/wcms_490162.pdf.
- Kennedy, E. (2010). The invisible corner: expanding workplace rights for female day laborers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 31(1), 126–159 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.seattleu.edu/stable/26377728.Google Scholar
- Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: towards a feminist synthesis. Feminist Review, 57(1), 28–48.Google Scholar
- Mahajan, N. (2013). The invisible caregivers: domestic workers in Mumbai and their struggle for unionizations. Women’s Policy Journal of Harvard.Google Scholar
- Marshall, T. H. (1950). Ctizenship and social class and other essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Labour and Employment (2011). Final report of the task force on domestic workers: realising decent work. Retrieved from https://labour.gov.in/annual-reports.
- Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary, 12(3), 333–358.Google Scholar
- National Commission for Women (2010). Domestic Workers Welfare and Social Security Act. Retrieved from http://ncw.nic.in/pdffiles/domestic_worker_welfare_and_social_security_act_2010.pdf.
- National Sample Survey Office (2018). Annual report 2016–2017. Retrieved: http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/mospi_Annual_Report_2016-17.pdf.
- Neetha, N. (2008). Regulating domestic work. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(37), 26–28 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40277945.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Aae2f751ab50620d6a16e939afcc53443.Google Scholar
- Nimunshakavi, N. (2012). Organizing domestic workers and workplace rights: a case study from Hyderabad. Journal of Workplace Rights, 16(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
- Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Psychological Review, 58(3), 303–328.Google Scholar
- Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Prajapati, B. J., Banker, K., Chauhan, J., & Nayak, S. (2017). Sociodemographic and housing condition urban slum and rural households, Gujarat India. National Journal of Community Medicine, 8(2), 90–93.Google Scholar
- Qayum, S., & Ray, R. (2003). Grappling with modernity: India’s respectable classes and the culture of domestic servitude. Ethnography, 4(4), 520–555.Google Scholar
- Sadl, Z. (2014). Perceptions of stigma: the case of paid domestic workers in Slovenia. Teorija In Praksa, 51(5), 904–927 Retrieved from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-PABW5DLQ/0f9668e4-322d-43f1-ba64-792a8557a5b3/PDF.Google Scholar
- Singh, V. (2017). Understanding psychological and social problems of domestic women worker and its impact on their well-being. Indian Journal of Health and Well-Being, 8(8), 786–788 Retrieved from http://iahrw.com/index.php/home/journal_detail/19#list.Google Scholar
- Sommer, M., Chandraratna, S., Cavill, S., Mahon, T., & Phillips-Howard, P. (2016). Managing menstruationin the workplace: an overlooked issue in low-income and middle-income countries. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(86), 86.Google Scholar
- The Domestic Workers (Regulation of Work and Social Security) Bill, No. 92 (2017). Retireved from http://184.108.40.206/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/Asintroduced/695LS%20AS.pdf.
- Thurston, W. E., & Vissandjée, B. (2005). An ecological model for understanding culture as a determinant of women’s health. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 229–242.Google Scholar
- UN Women (n.d.). Domestic workers count too: implementing protections for domestic workers. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2013/3/unwomen_iutc_factsheets%20pdf.pdf?la=en&vs=5930.
- United Nations (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
- Van der Ham, A., Ujano-Batangan, M., Ignacio, R., & Wolffers, I. (2014). Toward healthy migration: an exploratory study on the resilience of migrant from the Philippines. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(4), 545–568.Google Scholar